User talk:Trwl61

Speedy deletion nomination of Modern Baker


A tag has been placed on Modern Baker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 16:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Also, you can't write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your promo started with dedicated to improving people’s lives by pioneering the migration of healthier food from margins to mainstream. and went downhill from there.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

More
I posted this on my talk page, but I'll repeat it below so everything is in one place. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * note that your refs shouldn't be bare urls, some of your refs aren't acceptable (including Wikipedia) and some don't say what you claim. Just one example you said after a three-way auction, but your source isn't independent or third-party, and doesn't say that anyway. Books can just be given under a publications heading, with a publisher and isbn, but don't need a ref.
 * Because of your COI and the problems with the article, if you try again, do so at Draft:Modern Baker, which will also give you some protection from deletion.
 * See Help:Cheatsheet to see how to do wikilinks, eg Oxford, proper headings and italics.
 * Don't make spammy and unprovable claims like Modern Baker is in the forefront of scientific research into the relationship of food to human health, especially as regards Gut Health and GI. It is committed to pioneering the 'prevention economy especially as the company isn't even mentioned by your supposed source. The idea is that a reference supports what you have written, it's not there for decoration.
 * Be wary of an Accolades or Awards section. It looks spammy, especially in an article that is totally uncritical. If you mention the awards, do so in the text.
 * Tell us about the company, other than what it sells, since it appears to have no employees, turnover or profits.
 * This company may be notable, but you need to separate real facts from claims (unless presented as such} and opinions and speculation.
 * She may believe that her nutrition helped her fight cancer, but you must be very careful not to present that as a fact, particularly as it has no medical (or indeed, any) source

Your draft article, Draft:Modern Baker


Hello, Trwl61. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Modern Baker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)