User talk:Ts4221

Wepwawetemsaf
This content is being discussed on talk:Wepwawetemsaf Please get wp:consensus before removing.Thank you Adakiko (talk) 04:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Wepwawetemsaf. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 04:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Johnuniq (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2022 (UTC) See history at Wepwawetemsaf for 31 August 2022 and 1 September 2022. That follows User talk:Marmo59 and User talk:2A00:23C8:AB80:8001:85CA:64C7:5D2:E5F1. Johnuniq (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Right so how is it fair I am blocked but other user is not? Do those opinions actually matter or are they needed?

Media is watching this they are interested in your totalitarian ways they say it is not good and as bad as censorship. You do not allow other users to flourish Ts4221 (talk) 05:27, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

And I want you to answer me how is it fair to block one but not the other. Ts4221 (talk) 05:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

God hates you and he is gonna make you feel burn every damn minute over it! FUCK YOU Ts4221 (talk) 05:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)  Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 06:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Checkuser note ✅ socking via .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

}
User threatens to continue socking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)