User talk:Tsaintli

The first paragraph is defective. One should also consider plants, the earth itself,

Although I think it's unnecessary to include oceans, clean air, clean - as opposed to clan water, these essential and timeless valuable living assets are in play as well under (the rubric of) beauty.

In short, it's important to be comprehensive about what it means to experience this emotion in all its forms - not those that reflect or are limited to one other intersection or mingling.

Good luck with the article. Apparently not meany people have been whacking on it, or maybe not the one's I might have in mind.

Expansive in its fundamental definition is missing here. Maybe that's as it should be, but I wonder whether what makes people who don't always have the blessing of loving people around them also find and feel and participate in love in some discernible way.

How should it be measured? That I would defer to statisticians for a functional framework.

(The quality of love is it's essence in each case and in each type. Wholeness and exclusivity, or maybe sometimes separately, are dynamic or motion views here.  that's missing here too but I could be wrong Defining love rather than its pieces or components will yield probably more subjective than objective conclusions or assumptions

o)