User talk:Tschmitz13

August 2019
It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Also, even on the rare occasions when an organisation's web content about itself is licensed for such free reuse, it is scarcely ever suitable for republishing on Wikipedia, as it is not likely to be written from a neutral point of view, but is likely to promote or extol the supposed virtues of that organisation, as was indeed the case with the page you created. Both because of the copyright problem and because of its promotional character, the page has been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)