User talk:Tse d

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nathu La and Cho La clashes, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  MB laze Lightning T 08:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Nathu La and Cho La clashes. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Razer ( talk ) 17:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I might add that the comment you made there is quite inappropriate even if it were to be made on the talk page. Wikipedia is meant to be edited according to the policies (explained in the welcome message I gave you a few days ago). Theoretically, the nationality of the editors should not matter as long as they follow policies. If you find any editor editing against policies you are welcome to bring to the attention of any experienced editor or administrator. So, I would advise you to study the policies closely and follow them. In particular, the "Five pillars' articles are an absolute must. Happy editing! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Nathu La and Cho La clashes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Nathu La and Cho La clashes. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Razer ( talk ) 16:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Proper location for discussion of edits to article
Every article has a talk page. That's the place to discuss the editing of the article. You shouldn't drop such comments into the article itself. For example the talk page of the article in question is here: Talk:Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_clashes -- S Philbrick (Talk)  18:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nathu La and Cho La clashes. Adamgerber80 (talk) 06:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)