User talk:Tsenft7/sandbox

Starting point for improving this article, this topic is somewhat rare and there is not a lot of literature on this topic.Tsenft7 (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Feedback
Nice start on your draft. Some feedback
 * Make sure that your draft isn't less detailed than the existing article, unless you're unable to verify the current content. Remember that you're expanding what's there; don't replace good content just for the sake of replacing content.
 * You need a lead section. The lead section should summarize all the main points of the article, and shouldn't include anything that isn't in the body of the article.
 * Articles about medical content need to meet the sourcing requirements for medical content. Make sure that you're using review articles, not primary source studies. Part of the problem is that you aren't using properly-formatted references, which makes it difficult to check them. If you aren't sure how to add references using the cite tool, please revisit the section of the training module beginning on this page.
 * Lists aren't very useful ways of conveying information. Sentences and paragraphs are much more effective. If you do use a list, you need to make sure that each item in the list has a source. If someone added items to this list later, it wouldn't be clear what the source for each cause might be. Also make sure that all the terms are linked - it isn't very useful to include a term (that's likely to be unfamiliar to the average reader) without some way for them to learn more. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Secondary Article Review
Hello, Overall I thought this article was very informative and well written, I'd just suggest linking some terms (like Brown Sequard Syndrome and some of the brain regions) to their own wiki pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wheatona22 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)