User talk:Tsop

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DVD+ R/W 04:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Comments on talk page
Hi, I moved your comments on Talk:Avian_flu to the bottom of the page. New comments that are not a reply to existing topics are normally placed at the bottom. That is where most people will look and your comment may get 'lost' or regarded as an old issue when it is placed at the top. A quick way to do that is to click on the '+' button just beside the 'edit this page' button, add your subject/header and comment and it will appear at the bottom automatically when saved. --Dodo bird 10:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Wiki has ruined my life
My girlfriend just found out that I am an undercover wikipedian. Now she want's to leave me and since she is the boss's daughter, I will probably also lose my job. What should I do?

Tsop (talk) 12:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh dear. I hope that this guide will be useful;


 * If it doesn't work out, maybe you could write an article about it?  Chzz  ►  16:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tao Wells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Kraus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message I have sorted the disambiguation link Tsop (talk) 03:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Dubai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JLT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Souq.com, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mouhcine Fikri for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mouhcine Fikri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mouhcine Fikri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * History books and the like. By definition, no secondary sources can exist for recent events, because any coverage, being part of the context of the event, is a primary source.  This is long enough ago that something could have been published by now, I suppose, e.g. if the incident got covered in an academic journal; it's not as if normal peer review takes eight months.  Nyttend (talk) 11:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. Does this article fit the bill? It's on an academic publishing site: http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/26645/moroccos-hirak-movement_the-people-versus-the-makh Tsop (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The thing is that it's still part of the ongoing event, as can be seen from the final few sentences; it's not reporting on the situation after it concluded. Yes, it's a reliable source, but a reliable primary source, not a reliable secondary source.  Nyttend (talk) 21:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Contribute to Draft:Scott Disick
Hello, I have received permission to draft an article, Draft:Scott Disick, and had the draft page unprotected by an admin. I saw that you had commented on the talk page of the article Kourtney Kardashian regarding Scott Disick, and thought you may be interested in contributing to the draft. Also, if you are interested, we are trying to have a discussion on Talk:Scott Disick. Mukedits (talk) 19:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)