User talk:Tstanton009

October 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Daniel Mark Fogel‎. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Consider it a friendly notice that you're at the limit, rather than an accusation of a violation Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Your editing is now under discussion here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Daniel Mark Fogel
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Daniel Mark Fogel. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 06:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)