User talk:Tsumiki/Archive 2

WP:TPO
Don't you ever remove my or another editors' comments. This will be your only warning. D.Creish (talk) 05:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I must say you really know how to game. Tsumikiria (T/C) 05:48, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * , assuming you're referring to their removal of a warning template you placed here, they have every right to remove it. Vermont (talk) 22:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Democratic Socialists of America - Israel policy.
I believe it would be helpful to expand the article with DSA's stances on Israel (including some caucus differences) because this is notable and I don't think this will be the last time an editor will come in attempting to add such a sub-section. Left an expanded conversation about policy ideas from the Daily Beast article on the other users talk page, which probably should be moved to the article talk page as part of a larger discussion. (I do not believe in signing into my WP account anymore) 47.40.52.156 (talk) 06:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your additions and input. Please copy the entirety of your text on User talk:E.M.Gregory onto the article talk page so you can join the discussion and hear other editors' input. I would still recommend you to register or sign in your existing account. IPs are volatile. I'll get back to the matter later today when I have time. Thanks. Tsumikiria (T/C) 06:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Gab.
Basic stuff: if material appears in quotation marks followed by a citation, those words must appear in the citation. In the material that you replaced, that is not the case. Your edit, in effect, is making up something that isn't there. You'll need to find a source that contains those words if you want the quotes as such to be thwere. PaulCHebert (talk) 03:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm out on mobile, but feel free to google for sources that support them. They exist in ready numbers.Tsumikiria (T/C) 03:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

AOC
The source you quoted seems to have settled the argument, but one has to actually read the comments to see that. I don't have confidence. Could you modify your !vote to clarify the new information. Trackinfo (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅, and happy editing in 2019! Cheers. Tsumikiria (T/C) 11:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Just in case ...
Just in case the meaning of "shall" confuses you: Shall means "will". Should means "ought to". So their meanings are completely different and do not intersect. I don't know if you needed that info, but I thought I'd post it (here rather than on article-talk). Be well and Happy New Year! :) Softlavender (talk) 02:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thought I could use it to imply strong suggestion. I was wrong then. Thanks and happy January 2nd to you! Tsumikiria (T/C) 03:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Hi, Tsumikiria, you might want to keep an eye on this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez&type=revision&diff=877042025&oldid=877036420 --Nbauman (talk) 05:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry that I was too late to help. The previous consensus was settled by an admin who trimmed the section of all irrelevant/derailing characterizations of the protest and of the relevant groups, and assessments of the statement by media sources. I thought experienced editors like you would have opened a new section on the talk page already, as this isn't something worth warring about. I'd suggest appealing your topic ban, if possible, then follow the standard procedures of challenging and establishing consensus. Tsumikiria (T/C) 04:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your support. I'm always trying to cover myself, but I didn't realize that opening a section on the talk page would have made a difference. In the past, I've started a discussion on the talk page, cited Wikipedia policies and guidelines to support my edits, but a plurality of 2 editors who owned the page just went ahead and deleted everything. I don't really enjoy getting involved in Wikilawyering battles, I just want to write about medicine and molecular biology. But sometimes duty calls. Oh well, keep fighting. Or perhaps I should say, SFSN! --Nbauman (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Explaining on talk page for a reverted, or a possibly challengeable edit would definitely make a difference, especially on the highly contentious topic of American Politics. Only using edit summaries are insufficient. It might be exhausting to explain, but it is better than getting your proposed, legitimate content discredited in the eyes of other editors due to edit warring. For the best interest of your desired content, it is perhaps the best to act within the red lines of Wikipedia and engage with other editors, prepare to make necessary concessions, and never give others excuses to leverage, then you'll find a lot of space to stretch. SFSN. Tsumikiria (T/C) 07:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Nick Fuentes article
Hi Tsumikiria, after I voted on the AfD for Henrik Palmgren, I ran across the Nick Fuentes page, which I feel might be a similar case. It's a person that is mentioned in a bunch of articles, and is featured in one or two, but does it meet our notability guidelines? Could you have a look and give me your opinion on that? Also pinging because I felt he made some good points in the Palmgren Afd. Thanks. Ewen Douglas (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Time for some housecleaning then. I'll get back to the article some hours later when I have time so you can definitely make an AfD ahead of me. Happy New year, Ewen! Tsumikiria (T/C) 17:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I finally did get around to it myself. I hope you don't mind, I used pretty much the same wording you used in the Palmgren nomination, as I felt that summarized the case for deletion quite crisply and I could not have done it better myself. Happy new year! Ewen Douglas (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Wow. I'd at least paraphrase it. Anyway, I !voted for delete. Good day to you. Tsumikiria (T/C) 04:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I apologize if that is considered plagiarism, or at the very least, bad form. I'll effort to paraphrase in the future. Still think your words were well put! (including in your delete vote) Ewen Douglas (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Nah I'm fine with it, considering all our texts are under CC-BY-SA. Still kinda surprised that my writings were considered good(?) I'm still not as well versed in the Wiki Guideline Language. :) Tsumikiria (T/C) 17:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

ANI Notice - At least i have the good faith to put it on your talk page.
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.107.81.26 (talk) 11:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * B👏O👏O👏M👏E👏R👏A👏N👏G, my old friend. Tsumikiria (T/C) 17:54, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Gab
I've asked for protection. I suggest waiting for that. Doug Weller talk 11:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Can we finally get an indefinite semi protection? The page is a constant target for canvassing by the page's subject, with the latest one just hours ago. This may better manage the level of disruption we face. Tsumikiria (T/C) 16:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm involved, I can't do that. You might get ECP if you ask. Doug Weller  talk 17:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Ridiceo
I would just let it go. Yamla and I have both seen your edit, and it's generally a bad idea to revert edits on someone else's talk page. They can claim an exemption to WP:3RR, but it's harder for you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah I figured. Although it is still quite frustrating to have your comments trollishly blanket removed. Tsumikiria (T/C) 00:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Gab's tweets
What do you think about Gab's recent tweets calling out Wikipedia and you? 344917661X (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I find it a bit confusing why you're bringing this up. I reverted you making a comment earlier about it; there's no point in talking about idiots being idiots on twitter.--Jorm (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Tsumikiria made fun of Gab's tweets on his userpage, so I don't see why he shouldn't make fun of them here. 344917661X (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You're being a bit weird dude. PeterTheFourth (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, maybe I am being a bit weird, forget I said anything. 344917661X (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Reply to User talk:PBZE
I think that calling Antifa "far-left" is a fair description, given their use of violent and harassing tactics pointed out in the article, and the sources already in the article calling it far-left. This is nothing new on Wikipedia; I mimicked other articles that also describe its subject as extremist, such as the article on InfoWars.

Also, in your edit description you mentioned a consensus, but I couldn't find it. PBZE (talk) 05:51, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * A minority of sources cannot accurately represent the rest. The sources' familiarity should also be noted, as the AOL source you used misleadingly wrote the subject, a movement, as a congruous organization with members. The overwhelming consensus was to avoid the term "far-left". Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 18:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your signature
Greetings. FYI, per this, the color of your username has a contrast ratio of 3.527:1, significantly below the recommended minimum of 4.5:1. See WP:SIGAPP, in particular its footnote.

This is an accessibility issue, something Wikipedia takes somewhat seriously. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  22:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I likely scrolled through that provision without seeing the footnote so thank you for you advice. Fortunate for me that per MOS:ONWHITE there's still one or two hues of pink and purple permissible. Changed to #DC143C. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 18:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Since that is a named CSS color, you have the option of coding the name (Crimson) instead of the hex value. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  21:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Repeatedly challenging others' edits without a policy basis can be construed as WP:STONEWALLING, which is a form of disruptive editing. Try reverting less and compromising/talking more. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You were bold, I reverted you, now You should present your rationale onto Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, instead of raising DE and demanding compromise. As this section you're disputing has been settled multiple times in the past, standard procedures has to be followed. I wasn't being personal. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 21:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think you're being personal, though you appear to be doing everything you can do keep criticism or other changes you don't like out of the article: See . And by the way, what was the actual basis for your revert? Because you weren't 100% satisfied with my edit summary which read Restoring Arab-Israeli conflict to original position-this has received enough coverage to receive its own subheader, not be tucked away under "other issues"? This is an issue that's received significant coverage in WP:RS and the sources that were provided included Haaretz, the NYT, and others. On the talk pages, you've accused others of bias (including me) without evidence, while simultaneously making highly opinionated statements about Israel like we know Israeli media criticize anyone criticizing israel. I'm happy to discuss any of my proposals on the talk page (I've been doing so) but I'd appreciate a little more compromise before automatically reverting on your end. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 22:11, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Anarchism
Hi Tsumikiria,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 04:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Anticitizen
See  Doug Weller  talk 15:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Copying content between articles
For copyright reasons, it's best to put the "copied" template on the talk page when copying text from one articlE to another. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * P.S. I've done it for your Proud Boys to Patriot Prayer edit. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks. I was just going to do it myself. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 19:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
You were mistaken in telling a user that he was not permitted to remove a block notice from his user talk page. He would not be allowed to remove a declined unblock request referring to a current block, but that was not what he was doing. See WP:BLANKING. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * My mistake then. Although I must say permitting a user to remove an active block notice is a counterintuitive. Blanking of any incoming user warnings is a surefire sign of WP:NOTHERE. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

== Just information ==

Actually, users are allowed to remove block notices from their user talk. Best just to stay away from altering talk page posts unless it's real blatant copyvios or BLP problems.  Tide  rolls  20:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Can you support the addition of this notice? Legacypac (talk) 20:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * See here Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Saw the message, thanks for telling me.
Hey Tsumikiria, I saw your message and reversion of my previous edit. I made some grammar changes and revisions to my edit on the "Criticisms of Capitalism" page (but didn't change the Antifa page). Thanks for the heads up and I'll be sure to be careful in choosing better sources and make sure to write more professionally.

Take care, fellow dem socialist.

-Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickelsplash (talk • contribs) 01:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

ANI
Requesting WP:REVDEL at WP:ANI is not a good idea. If just revision deletion, see WP:Revision deletion. If you want full suppression, see Requests for oversight, or E-mail the User:Oversight. I didn't look at the diffs, myself, but.... 06:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Al Noor Mosque, Christchurch
The interesting information we discussed is already public knowledge in two ANZUS-pact nations and among violent fascists worldwide; and it's likely well known to any Stormer followers at Breitbart or Fox News. WP can't stop those two widely read publications from headlining it in the most damning ways imaginable -- not unless we publish it first (in a straightforward and respectful way). Then it instantly becomes "stale news". Could you propose some suitable language? In solidarity, Dervorguilla (talk) 07:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Talk:JohnTopShelf
By the way - you can refer to me using singular male pronouns rather than they. There is only one of me. Thanks! And sorry about the bubble tea and goats. I wasn't sure how to get on your talk page otherwise (but now I know). JohnTopShelf (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Unjustified Removal
Hello. You removed my edit without sourcing for your justification. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Identity_Movement&type=revision&diff=888524026&oldid=888523107 Who is RS? Please provide sourcing for your edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamSamuel11 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * RS is WP:Reliable Source. Please cite reliable sources for your change, thanks. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Discussion
Hello, I wrote here to reply about edits. Thank you.Wetrace (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Identity Evropa. Guy Macon (talk) 00:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Xi Jinping
Hi - I've deleted this as a BLP violation. Please remember that, per WP:FOOLS, being a joke does not exempt anything from basic content policies. Thanks, ansh 666 00:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Uhh. Ansh, I understand the basis of your rationale, but is it truly necessary to summarily delete an April Fools AfD that is a mere mockery of a dictator-for-life? At least you can tell me to move and archive it under my userspace, not? Really feels like no fun allowed. Again, happy April first. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 00:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Umm, yes? WP:BLP is one of the most core policies of this place. It applies in all namespaces and other core policies have exceptions to enforce it. We do not tread lightly around this stuff. ansh 666 04:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Signature
Hey, this is not a major concern but you might want to change the colour of your userlink as it appears as a redlink. While not disallowed, it is a bit misleading (and people might wikilawyer to tell you that it's not allowed), but anyway it's up to you, thought I'd let you know. -- QEDK ( 後  ☕  桜 ) 19:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I originally used pink but someone then told me that per MOS:ONWHITE it had insufficient contrast so I used crimson instead. Now I've added a pink hue instead. Hopefully this will clarify it. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Jacob Wohl
Please revert your possible BLP violation, for which there is no consensus. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No, you reached 3RR with edit with an inaccurate edit summary. The consensus is against you. Use the talk page and I will not reply further here. Tsumikiria⧸  🌹🌉 20:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Wrong. The discussion is divided, and you removed an in-text attribution (again, please review WP:LABEL and WP:INTEXT). You would do well to self-revert here. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Consensus is not prevented by making rapid succession of reversions. And I said use the talk page and I will not reply further here. Next time you do this, I will remove the sections altogether. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Consensus on short description of Gab
In your revert you said there was concensus. I cannot find it. It seems like the short description was added without any concensus. Alex.osheter (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It was on Archive 6. Check it out. Please make good use of the archives. Thanks. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 07:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Ili_Kazakh_Autonomous_Prefecture
Hello! Could you help me to find chinese original name for Governar № 5,6,7 in link above?--Kaiyr (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

American Identity Movement
We can always hope that Marvel will sue them for using their acronym. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * We can only hope. They actually stole their name from the American Indian Movement. At least another bunch of losers is getting sued this week. Tsumikiria⧸  🌹🌉 20:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * My first thought was AOL's AIM Crystal128-aim.svg owns the trademark here -MJL]] lol &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 03:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Awaiting your response
Just an FYI, I replied to your comment on Gab. If you've got the time, please stay on so we can discuss this and reach a conclusion in a speedy matter. Alex.osheter (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Usernames
If a user changes their username, it should be assumed that they do not want that old username resurrected. Please make sure to address users by their current name except in circumstances such as an SPI where old usernames would be required for taking administrative action against them. Primefac (talk) 22:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Christchurch shooter
In his manifesto he stated that he was Maoist. So clearly his intent was a nationalist identity but not through alt right but through communism https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-christchurch-manifesto-china-20190316-story.html https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/03/15/killers-manifesto-reveals-white-supremacist-who-admires-communist-china/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-zealand-mosque-shooters-manifesto-apparently-posted-online-admires-communist-china_2839838.html. Super ma&#39;am (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Ignoring my sources
I gave you 3 (three) sources. And yet you do not give a timely answer back. All I ask is some consideration and communicate a little. I'm awfully new at this and yet I can still figure out how to communicate. So please answer. Super ma&#39;am (talk) 13:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That's great. Now please paste the links onto Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings, where discussions are being held, so you can listen to what other editors have to say about this. Thanks. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 17:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quick comment
DS alerts are only added every 12 months, and in certain cases not even then, eg the editor has been involved in an AE case in the area recently. Doug Weller talk 18:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the lesson in WP:MISSION. I thought it was just another extraneous fact.Tym Whittier (talk) 04:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

this kitten wants you...
to bash more fashy

Falseblastaudiblegrind (talk) 13:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 

There's a thread at WP:AN/I that involves you.
Not going to let somebody come in and say that another wikipedia editor is supporting violence uncontested. Simonm223 (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

I would be cautious
about making edits at antifa as you recently did while labeling yourself a supporter as you currently do on your user page. This message should probably self-destruct in 13 seconds. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 04:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I've been working that article for a couple months and is actually the first occurrence. At least its funny to watch.  Tsu  *miki*⧸ 🌉 04:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, well that was going to happen. Did you happen to catch my picture in the article? Oh, it was you who took it out. Carptrash (talk) 05:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Uh, yeah. It was a nice picture, but I thought an image with anarchist and other flags used by leftists would help better illustrate the ideology part. At least the flags looks rad. Tsu  *miki*⧸ 🌉 05:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I suspect that an article this size cold use more than one picture and still be okay. Carptrash (talk) 16:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)