User talk:TsvetanUsunov

Welcome!

 * }

OpenEEG
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, OpenEEG, may be copied from http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/doc/index.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of OpenEEG


A tag has been placed on OpenEEG, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 1966batfan (talk) 15:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570404530 your edit] to List of open-source hardware projects may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * of engineers, who wanted to play with neurofeedback. The project is hosted on Sourceforge.net. . OpenEEG kits, blank

Proposed deletion of OLinuXino


The article OLinuXino has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No independent sources, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, TsvetanUsunov. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article OLinuXino, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 01:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Moved to userspace
I moved the article to User:TsvetanUsunov/OpenEEG, but I'll be honest in that this article needs to be re-written entirely from scratch. The article is not only lacking reliable sources to show notability but it reads like one long promotion for the project.

Now by reliable sources, I mean that the project has received coverage in sources that are not only independent of the subject, but are considered reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines. Linking to places that host the project does not count as a reliable source and shouldn't be linked to in general as they're considered to be "merchant" sources even if they aren't charging anything. A reliable source would be something along the lines of coverage in say, a medical journal that is writing a review on the project.

As far as promotional prose goes, the article as a whole is considered to be promotional. Phrases such as "Why OpenEEG was created?" are considered to be inappropriate for section headers or for the article as a whole. Sentence portions such as "low cost EEG device which to be replacement of the expensive commercial Electroencephalography devices and can be used at home" just don't read neutrally. I understand that the project's intent is to create a lower cost product, but writing it in that format makes it seem as if you're downplaying the more expensive stuff while showing value for the project. I know this must sound frustrating, so I thought I'd give an example of how you can phrase this a little more neutrally: "OpenEEG is an open source hardware and software project that focuses on developing a lower cost version of EEG devices frequently used in professional health care." This brings across the gist that this is aimed towards average consumers while still being fairly neutral-ish in tone. This still isn't perfect, but it won't be as noticeable if the rest of the article is rewritten to be neutral. The one thing to remember is that you need to figure out what does and doesn't belong in the article. For example, commenting upon the warranty of the product isn't necessary unless the project has had an extreme amount of lawsuits or commentary upon that subject.

I'd probably recommend that you look into getting someone from WikiProject Medicine to help you write the article. On a side note, I do have to emphasize that if you are a representative for the company or someone that was asked to create this page on their behalf, that you look over our conflict of interest guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)