User talk:Tterterian

WinSPC
A template has been added to the article WinSPC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. DanielPenfield 14:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello Daniel: I reviewed the NPOV policy and information on bias. I have also edited the article as to not present any information that could be bias. Can you please review and let me know what could be considered bias--and grounds for removal? Yes, my role is Marketing Director. However, if that is the sole reason that this is considered for removal, someone else can place a similar article if they did not work for our company or weren't being compensated in any way?

If indeed, this is determined to be against Wikipedia policy, then I would have to dispute your page with the following opinion -- "General perception" and "the Well Known (Book)" does not identify a group. Who is it well known by? What would make something "Well known?" Also, you are promoting a book. These two things are clearly outlined as against policy....I made certain to clearly describe a common software application and how its used and by whom. Pleae let me knwo where it could be bias and I will gladly revise. --Quoted from the page on statistics published by you....--- Main article: Misuse of statistics

"There is a general perception that statistical knowledge is all-too-frequently intentionally misused, by finding ways to interpret the data that are favorable to the presenter. A famous quote, variously attributed, but thought to be from Benjamin Disraeli[2] is, "There are three types of lies - lies, damn lies, and statistics." The well-known book How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff discusses many cases of deceptive uses of statistics, focusing on misleading graphs. By choosing (or rejecting, or modifying) a certain sample, results can be manipulated; throwing out outliers is one means of doing so. This may be the result of outright fraud or of subtle and ..." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tterterian (talk • contribs).