User talk:Tting/Art History - Renaissance

Cleanup
This article needs a hell of a lot of cleanup. Dan Beale-Cocks 19:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

…Recomendation by D>G.DeL-Dorchseter Mass, I believe that the terming Renaissance and the name of it should be studied much earlier then the 1400's. I must say or sugjest that many words are Organised from other words i the word Renaissance could be derived from three or four circumstances possibly even the helping of a couple of different languages for the letters such as 'n' ai, and re together and the capability of a word haveing the same resemblance as it self meaning the portions of the word in different styles still will represent the same thing noting the word Recalibration re and re and calib and aiss and sance or ance and bration wich meaning a section of and all three or any part of word still carries the same formilularity.

This is for sure just a sugjestion and is why it is here on a Talk section my organisational skills and tallent for spelling is the reason why this is just a sugjestion, though my research has been of conduct of the matter and leads me to have concern that the authority of Knowledge may pre-exist most of what histry reveals.

Example od a sugjestion and the tallent of Authority during a Period before our time, Example a King has several Knights in the task of a Renaissance first the discription of what a Renaissance is; is it a sentance or More consisting of Paregraph of a certain sequence throughout the Land, and should be advised as an Authority type degree, as saying the Renaissance as well as saying the word Balance.

One goes to town and says Balance what is this thy is speaking with or about. It is foor sure a Concern.

A Knight finally enters the Castle after a Ling trip and speaks in order before the King. I have it as a Renaissance. or, I have the Renaissance you have Informed me to inquire in, or something in that effect.

Could this be possible, maybe i shall degree it better some other time though i thought this would be of concern in writing, and could this be a Renaissance.

My study still is the carrector of the word may be before the times sugjested, for it is still in sugjestion.

It is a Matter of Study and writings. 2:14 P.M. E.S.T.David George DeLancey (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion
I for one think this article should be deleted. All the information it contains is better covered elsewhere, such as Italian Renaissance painting, Renaissance architecture etc. Does anyone agree with me? mais (talk) 13:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

…I Think it is a resembled Article and is well of one to be read well over something of mine wich realy isn't an Article for a complete standard though may help resemble a study, alot of us are currious i know for i get around two radio talk late at night driveing and for twenty years something is bound to come up and the history in our Nation does very for instence i was raised in a town were the learning school was of uniqueness even though my tallent as a writer needs more the education i got just in grammer school was very interesting, what i'm trying to say is anyway with or without one tends to fend for them selfs and ofcourse theres the finall commpletion yes when a question is asked that means something such as the study alone in the word Question. Putting oneself in early times as early as the 4th centry or 800's even the question would be a lesson perhaps. till next 6:02 p.m. e.s.t.David George DeLancey (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Merged
What content could be salvaged from this article has been incorporate in the main Renaissance article, sections: Art, Northern Renaissance. Obviously the person who wrote it is very knowledgeable but with poor command of English and wiki editing skills. I will propose this article for deletion.Xenovatis (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)