User talk:Ttnst

Welcome!

Hello, Ttnst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kasumi kaho, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JDDJS (talk) 20:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Kasumi kaho


A tag has been placed on Kasumi kaho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 20:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you really believe that a significant number of western wikipedia users are fluent in Japanese? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Kaho Kasumi / Eigapedia
Hi, Ttnst. I noticed you started an article on Kaho Kasumi, and have run into some deletion / formatting problems. I spent a few years working on Japanese and Korean cinema here at Wikipedia, but finally came to the conclusion that fighting for the survival of articles was not worth the time it takes away from contributing content. I moved over to Eigapedia, a project devoted to Japanese cinema. The only "proof" needed for an article there is that it be connected to Japanese cinema. We include Pink films there, of course. AVs have not been worked on, but I wouldn't be opposed to their inclusion also. I already started an article on Kaho Kasumi there (http://eiga.wikia.com/wiki/Kasumi_Kaho), as well as her award-winning Pink Film Shiofuki hanayome no sei hakusho, and a couple others. A few days ago I started Yeonghwapedia to work on Korean films more than Japanese for the next year, but feel free to join me over at Eigapedia if you want to work on Japanese cinema without having to worry about defending your work against unnecessary deletion. Best regards, Dekkappai (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC) ("Tokkan Kozo" at Eiga/Yeonghwa-pedia)


 * With deepest respect to all involved, my comment related not to the quality of the article, but to the fact that it was in Japanese. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)