User talk:Tubedogg

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this:. Four tildes ( ~ ) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 00:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Linking dates
It is not normal Wikipedia style to link a year (or almost anything else) over and over when it appears multiple times in an article. The only real exception is month/day combination: that's because February 4, for example, will show up as February 4 or 4 February, depending on a user's settings, and we want to make that happen on every occurrence. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:09, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)

I'll Be
Hi there!

On Edwin McCain and Misguided Roses, you wrote that "I'll Be" was the top single or song, respectively, of 1998. Where? Please specify any country/genre/broadcaster/chart where this occured. On this apparent copy of the 1998 Billboard top 100 it shows at number 71 for the year, having peaked at number 5.

I'll remove the assertions for now, to prevent any false conclusions. But certainly I wouldn't be surprised if it topped a radio format airplay chart, a regional chart, etc. So please do add anything you can. :) Cheers! Samaritan 01:00, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Article Creation : HiveMail
Hi Please excuse me if this is in the wrong place (I'm new and it says at the top of the talk page that I should write questions on the talk page... but I'm not sure how to create a new section so I've loaded the last section and created a new heading(?) using double '=' characters.

My question is, you say on your user page that you own HiveMail. I hardly know anything about HiveMail and although HiveMail's site contains a lot of info I usually check Wikipedia first... I did and I couldn't find anything about HiveMail.

Seeing as you're the owner of the site (and better acquainted with it than I am) perhaps you should create a simple article for it ? I'm not sure if that's a conflict of interest/an issue.

Thanks

Aquarat (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

updating album ratings
Thanks for going through the album ratings and updating them. Not all of the ratings do use stars though. I don't know if you're checking that. If they only use a numeric rating, we should not convert it to stars. However, if it's already displaying as stars, and you're running a script or other automated process, I don't think you need to check. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't been checking the validity or source of the ratings (except in a handful of cases where the template was used but no parameters were present). I have only been rounding to the nearest whole or half number to conform to the template requirement, and adding the score parameter in that case to reflect the original score. I have seen some cases where there was use of the rating template intermixed with ratings that were not in the template -- presumably meaning the source did not use a star rating, like you say -- and I left those non-template ratings alone. tubedogg   (talk)  01:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * You're welcome, and thanks for the barnstar :D tubedogg   (talk)  22:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Deception (2018 TV series)
I added the ratings for the series first and the other user over-edited them with the less accurate and unreliable source. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Since there is a disagreement, I suggest you direct discussion of your proposed edits to the article's talk page as the other editor requested, so as to come to a consensus. Edit warring is not in anybody's best interest and can lead to editing blocks. tubedogg   (talk)  22:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm over it. showbuzz is the better source due to their consistent use of three decimal places and their listing of up to 150 top cable shows.  Whereas zap2it only round broadcast finals to two and only list the top 25 cable shows and do not average the broadcast shares correctly.  So since multiple editors seem to want to keep and force the zap2it's style of broadcast final rounding on every article I'm giving up on this whole site's TV articles. And those editors can go to hell.  119.224.3.221 (talk) 04:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * This IP user has a history regarding the presentaiton and rounding of viewership figures, resulting in lengthy discussions including User_talk:Whats_new%3F/Archive_3. I noticed you reported it to the admin noticeboard and I'll be interested to see the result there, as I have come close to doing so myslef in the past -- Whats new?(talk) 06:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Get a life and stop stalking users. And you fail to realize the tvtonight numbers are rounded but are presented without metric prefixes. And I stopped using a registered account here because of stalkers like you. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I have no horse in this race. I came across the page via Recent Changes. I could care less what format/precision of numbers is used. (So if you want to continue that discussion, please do it someplace other than my talk page.) What I will say is that edit warring and violations of WP:3RR, which an administrator did find reason to think you, 119.224.3.221, were engaged in, causes users to be blocked whether it's an IP or registered account. I suggest that you consider WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD going forward. If you find yourself constantly at odds with another editor(s) and can't come to a consensus, it may be best to find other articles to work on. tubedogg   (talk)  22:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Consensus never works as all an editor needs is one other editor to agree with their way of doing things regardless of if it makes sense or not. I like other editors have ended up moving on to other articles, but you eventually encounter the same problem especially in regard to related TV articles.  I have never met such a controlling group of editors who enforce and restrict edits to their way of doing things as dictated by MOS:TV which is used as more a rule book and NOT a style guide.  119.224.3.221 (talk) 01:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Harrow (TV series)
The editor AlexTheWhovian has taken over yet another article with unnecessary and repetitive table fields and can not be reasoned so discussion of any sort would be futile. Editor should be reported for his dictatorial style of editing. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 11:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * More at my talk page. You've been told before not to edit war, on this very talk page. --  Alex TW 11:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Rollback and reviewer granted
Hello Tubedogg. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A granted] the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.


 * Rollback user right
 * Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).


 * Pending changes reviewer user right
 * The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing.
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! S warm  ♠  20:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

No more nonsense
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:32.218.42.122 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 32.218.42.122 (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * You made a mistake in of Jeffrey Dahmer and I chose to assume good faith, and therefore left you a notification, not a warning or block. Your use of this template on my talk page makes me believe that you were not, in fact, editing in good faith, and simply vandalized the article by removing valid content, and I will view your future contributions accordingly.  tubedogg   (talk)  21:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * You just failed Logic 101. 32.218.42.122 (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Says the guy who stated that "[t]he Discovery Channel has broadcast an episode focusing upon Dahmer's crimes" is "commentary that belongs on the talk page." I'm not being vindictive. I'm simply stating that you followed your error (or vandalism) on Jeffrey Dahmer by accusing me of abusing warning templates by warning you or blocking you, neither of which were done. That doesn't seem like the action of a person who is editing constructively or in good faith themselves. tubedogg   (talk)  21:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Sir William Gladstone
I removed the content from Sir William Gladstone's article because when someone dies, they are removed from the Order of Precedence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:4D00:8780:B847:3B02:AA9A:F478 (talk) 01:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. Please be sure to include that type of information in your edit summary to avoid confusion. I see that you've reverted my edit with a comment explaining, so we're good to go. tubedogg   (talk)  02:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Tubedogg! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)