User talk:Tufayl Ahmad

October 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Leh. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 21:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Tufayl Ahmad, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Leh district, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

October 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kargil district, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dogra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Leh has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

POV Edits with misleading edit summary that says "Fixed grammar"
Please stop your POV Edits with misleading edit summary that says "Grammar fixes". you edits have already been reverted. This topic area is covered by WP:ARBIPA and continuing such behavior will lead to block or topic bans from editing such articles. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  09:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Ikhwan (Kashmir)
 * 1998 Chapnari massacre


 * Tafayl: I'll second DBigXray's message. In fact, almost all your edits qualify as "POV Edits with misleading edit summary" (additional examples:, , ). This needs to stop or else you will be blocked. Please read wikipedia's policies on sourcing and neutral POV, and use honest and appropriate edit-summaries. Abecedare (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN MEDUSA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mohammad Tawhidi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   17:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for blatant BLP violations (example) and continuing to make POV edits with deceptive edit summaries despite multiple recent warnings on exactly that topic. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Abecedare (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)