User talk:Tuj53916/sandbox

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? The article-draft adds a different perpespective to the article. My partner added information about another religion and how both religions view pigs as a dirty animals.

2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? To understand the article all the information that is present is needed.

3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain. Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. The article reflects a neutral view of things because its not telling you not to eat pork, but why someone religions do not eat pork.

4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? The article doesn't concave reader but gives supporting details in why eating pork is looked down upon.

5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why? No, since we both have the same article we both added something more about the Quran and how pork is viewed in the Quran.

6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! NO

7. A'Jenai ThompsonA&#39;Jenai Thompson (talk) 17:33, 25 October 2019 (UTC)