User talk:Tuj63550/sandbox

Rose Tuk12017 (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

It adds info from another point of view on whey supplements

2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?

No

3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain.

It now had positive and negative, could maybe use additional negative info to maintain balance

Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic.

4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors?

Will need to be careful to be neutral when writing and not drawing any conclusions, needs to just convey info from sources

5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why?

Not fully written

6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

No

7. Write your name followed up by "Tuk12017 (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)"