User talk:Tulkolahten/Archive9

Kazdy blok nekdy prospeje. Me jednou blokl i sam "velky" Jimbo Wales. :) - Darwinek 22:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Nazval jsem ho behem jedne diskuse, ze "cim je starsi, tim vic se chova jako fuhrer" :). Dodnes si za tim stojim, bo prisel do jedne diskuse a uzavrel ji s tim, ze "tohle se nediskutuje". Bylo to vlastne hlasovani. --Darwinek 22:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Jo living people, nejvetsi blbost jaka se na WP kdy stala. Zacalo tehdy CFD hlasovani o smazani tehle blbosti, za par minut tam byli skoro vsichni pro delete, naskocil fuhrer, rozehnal hlasovani a uzavrel to. A to je presne to, co si vudcove WP predstavuji pod pojmem "community consensus". - Darwinek 22:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

No nasral jsem se. Vsechny ty jejich bulshit kecy jak se chovat a sami se tim neridi. Jimbo neni pro me nikdo jiny nez Stalin v demokratickem prevleku. - Darwinek 23:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

LOL - Darwinek 10:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Myslim si, ze tohle nema cenu resit na WP nejak. Nikdy by to neskoncilo. Dej si pauzu od WP, to pomaha, ver mi. Sam jsem byl nucen kdysi si ji parkrat dat, je to nejlepsi lek.--Darwinek 10:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Zalezi to na tobe, rozhodni se sam co je pro tebe nejlepsi. (s tim odchodem) --Darwinek 10:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Přimlouvam se velice za to, aby se  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ přestal duševně vysilovat účastí na nekonečných edit wars a naopak se více soustředil na osvědčenou trpělivou tvůrčí činnost ve prospěch projektu WikiProject Czech Republic, kde se stal nepostradatelným autorem a moc by nám chyběl kdyby odešel. Například jsem včera založil nový článek o Františku Moravcovi a moc bych potřeboval, aby si to  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ kvalifikovaně prohlédl a sdělil mi případné připomínky. Myslím proto, že jeho činnost jako odborného "supervisora" a korektora je nezbytná. Děkuji.--Bluewind 12:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply
From WP:USER: On a user's own talk page, policy does not prohibit the removal of comments at that user's discretion, although archival is preferred to removal. So he can remove whatever he wants, though arhviving would be better. (I'm not sure if this next part is official policy or not, so take with a grain of salt if you wish) I know that I've seen a few admins admonish users who continually replace warnings on user talk pages after the "owner" has removed them. The only situations where I usually see users continue the placement, without it being considered harassment or disruption, are when the user is a vandal-only account, indef banned, or not established. There was a big policy debate about this. Also, there is a bit of a sidepoint, since the messages in this case were placed as personal attacks.(See the history between User:R9tgokunks and User:LUCPOL)--Wildnox(talk) 13:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll also see if I can dig up any arbcom cases involving this kind of stuff.(ArbCom decisions are almost like case law here)--Wildnox(talk) 14:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Quote
"... with the first policital (not power) center in France, so according your logic HRE = France." No, not according to my logic, because you didn't read everything i said out of arrogance anyways, and because you do not want to understand that the Holy Roman Empire WAS Germany. (oh and by the way the major official languages of the Holy Roman Empire were German/Dutch, and Latin and the Legislature of the HRE was always composed of a Hoftag or a Reichstag(oh... wait-THOSE ARE GERMAN WORDS! How strange!). "In his famous 1667 description De statu imperii Germanici, published under the alias Severinus de Monzambano, Samuel Pufendorf wrote: "Nihil ergo aliud restat, quam ut dicamus Germaniam esse irregulare aliquod corpus et monstro simile ..." ("We are therefore left with calling Germany a body that conforms to no rule and resembles a monster")." (If you don't understand English, he's calling HRE GERMANY. Hmm. WONDER WHY.) -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 19:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Steller
''I wish to make a complain on administrator level against this user, she's calling me a racist just because I nominated her article for deletion. And she vandalises other pages like Litoměřice where she wrote it is the german city, I reverted it back.''  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 20:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you aware of the circumstances leading to Dr. Steller's block? Agathoclea 11:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Dear Tulkolahten,

I just reverted your edit to AN/I, which kinda messed up the page (appeared to be replaced with completely different discussions). I am not sure what happened right there, you might wanna take a look. Regards, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 13:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I see you already solved the issue. You appeared to have replaced the page with old discussions somehow. Good that it is sorted out now, cheers. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 13:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Troubles
Thanks for the note.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Darwinek
Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Darwinek. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Darwinek/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Darwinek/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 19:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Čus. Myslel jsem, že na to přijdeš sám. :) Protože jsou součástí Sudetenlandu, připojeného tehdy k Německu, a součástí Sudentenlandu byly proto, protože většina obyvatel byli Němci. - Darwinek 14:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Zase s tím začínáš? Nesmysly jsem nenapsal, jsi anti-německý od počátku co jsem tě zde potkal a už se ani nezměníš. Svým patrně rozhořčením nad přidáním banneru dáváš de facto najevo "my češi můžeme nad tímto článkem spolupracovat na půdě projektu, ale Němci ne". - Darwinek 14:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Promin, jestli se ti zdala moje reakce neadekvatni. Me se zdalo, ze jsi rozhorceny, bo jsi mi hned psal :). Arbitraz je zatim horce-vesela. Ukazuje celou skalu veci: moje predchozi chyby, neutralni uzivatele, ktere neznam a jsou neutralni a nakonec nejlepsi- typci, kteri jdou tvrde proti me aby se me zbavili nadobro z Wiki (vetsina techto uzivatelu jsou, rekneme vychodoslovane, ze kterymi mame same spory :)). Vypada to, ze budu nejak potrestan, jsem pesimista, tipuju to na desysoping, ale jestli to dopadne dobre, tak dostanu jenom podminku. Skoda, ze ArbCom nefunguje jako ceske soudy :D. P.S. Cekam kdy se pripoji se svou troskou Evzen :)). Paradoxne by mi to mozna pomohlo, protoze toho tady zna vic lidi nez me a vsichni ho maji "moc radi". -- Darwinek 14:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * To nic, to je dobry :). Ale dalo se cekat, ze se v pravem okamziku vynori supi :(. Piotruś me tam uz branil az az a ten se v tom veze se mnou. Ty nase "spory" je de facto nevyslovene deleni na dva tabory. Kdykoli je nejaka anketa k polske, litevske ci ruske historii tak je vzdy krasne videt jak stejni uzivatele hlasuji porad po stejnych stranach :), de facto podle narodnosti uzivatelu nebo sympatii. Takze nekteri (staci si precist arbkom, hned poznas kteri) promptne vyuzivaji situaci aby se zbavili "jednoho hlasu nepritele" :). Jo jo, je to tvrdy darwinisticky boj, he he. Pretrva pouze nejsilnejsi. :) - Darwinek 15:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Vsak jeste uvidime no. Ani uz to ted neresim, co bude to bude, pokorne prijmu svuj osud. - Darwinek 18:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * K Jimbovi to nechcu hnat. Vsak to mozna dopadne dobre, uvidime jeste. ;) - Darwinek 21:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Karlsbad
Before reverting or deleting tags, please discuss. You have now, without naming any reasons, not only removed a tag but also removed my last contribution on the talk page. Unoffensive text or character 11:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I just noticed you and Balcer discussed it on Darwinek's user page. Why don't you do it on the Karlovy Vary talk page? I would have read the discussion and not insisted on the tag. I think the line of argument is faulty: The tag says that the project is about topics related to Germany, not about German towns or regions. But, anyway, I will not insist as Darwinek has withdrawn the tag. No offense meant. Unoffensive text or character 11:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:Czech Republic offer
Thank you for the offer on the invitation on WikiProject Czech Republic, but I will politefully decline. I apprecaite your offer though on this. Chris 12:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal Attacks
Please stop your personal attacks against me. I really do NOT want to push forth for mediation or any other means of protection, but if you force me to do so, I will. Antman -- chat 13:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Paul111/Dutch ethnic group
Hi Tulkolahten, I don't know if you found for yourself already, but Paul111 is trying to get the article Dutch (ethnic group) deleted. Please make yourself heard and stop him.Thanks.

Articles for deletion/Dutch (ethnic group)

Rex 13:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

hey
Hey Its gamblin i dont think iv talked to u before but could u right somthing back to me pleese Gamblin 14:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)GamblinGamblin 14:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)undefined

Dutch (ethnic group)
See my comment at User_talk:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise.--Paul111 19:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Logic
Actually, I was mocking what's-his-name's attempt at using logic by using his own logic against him. -I- never claimed that Bohemia was part of Germany, I only claimed that if what he had said was true, then it would have been, hence his claim was invalid. Antman -- chat 07:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Schindler's article
I appreciate your purification effort, but there was no need to change the sentence "Zwittau is now known as Svitavy in the modern Czech Republic" - there is nothing political incorect, and it was the consensus of me and JGHowes (see the history). Honzula 13:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Karlovy Vary
Look, I am on your side of the argument! Frankly I think your over-aggressive editing style, here and in the previous naming debate, does little or nothing to help the argument you are supporting. Johnbod 21:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright status of Image:JanZajíc.jpg
Please note that the file is probably not in the public domain (in accordance with the Czech copyright law). However, if it is the only (or one of the few) available photo of Jan Zajíc, we can probably claim fair use for it. To comply with Wikipedia fair use policies and guidelines, you should replace the image copyright tag with, and provide all available information about it: where did you get it, where it was published, who is the author (if possible; "author is unknown" and "I don't know the author" are not synonyms) etc., and add a rationale for why you believe that its inclusion in the article constitutes fair use.

Thanks for your cooperation; if you need help, please contact me on my talk page. Regards, Mike Rosoft 11:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have added a fair use claim to the image, and even discovered the source. I may ask the Czech Radio about its copyright status, but I hope the information is sufficient to prevent its deletion (for now). - Mike Rosoft 14:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

České středohoří
Hi, when you are back from you wikibreak, could you please visit the discussion on the English translation of the name of Czech Central Mountains. The problem is how to translate "středohoří" (De: Mittelgebirge). I am not an English native speaker but the newest translation medium mountains sounds strange to me. The more, I cannot trace any translation of this mountain region. My suggestion would Czech highlands but I am not the one to decide. Thanks! --Cepek 09:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Re
Cislo pet zije. :)) Jeste dycham, verdikt soudu jsem vzal v pohode celkem, respektuji ho. Za nejaky cas je pozadam o propusteni za dobre chovani. - Darwinek 21:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Asi ano. Z toho verdiktu to vyplyva. - Darwinek 21:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ne ne. Verdikt je takovy, ze muzu za cas pozadat ArbCom o navraceni. Oni to zmenili z toho duvodu, bo dobre vedi, ze RFA bych uz nikdy neprosel. - Darwinek 21:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Nemam, ale jen si predstav, staci kdyz nekdo nahodi celou Evidence z ArbCom pripadu. Ty by jsi hlasoval support pro takoveho kandidata? :) Ja asi ne. - Darwinek 21:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

film/movie
Ahh... wonderfully vague English language! A good place to start to see how it's generally used is WikiProject Films/Style guidelines. Generally, in titles 'film' is used, same with categories, templates, etc. Within an article though, either "film" or "movie" is acceptable. Some 'purists' will make the change to 'film' when wikifying, especially when linking to genres, like drama films and the like. You're correct, movie is always a noun, film can be used both as a noun or a verb. They're generally used interchangablly in English, however here, the general preference is for 'film' (though no one will bite you if you use movie)! Hope that helps a bit - be sure to check out the link to the style guidelines. SkierRMH 07:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Pilsner
If you have a problem with a translation of a name, fix that. I thought the problem was using references in German to source the article. There is a heck of a lot changed in that edit aside from a German name or two. Lexicon (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You say you want English, but you want the city to be called Plzen instead of the much more common in English, Pilsen. Why? Lexicon (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Fine, keep working on it, and I'll try to keep an eye on it so that Matthead doesn't try to insert POV language. Lexicon (talk) 20:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Does the a. s. in Plzeňský Prazdroj, a. s. mean something like Ltd., Inc., etc? Lexicon (talk) 20:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * That would be a publicly-held corporation (if the shares are traded openly), or privately-held corporation (if those shares are closely held). As such, the letters should not be part of the article title (we do not include the Ltd., Co., Corp., Inc., etc. of companies in English on Wikipedia).  I will fix the article title accordingly. Lexicon (talk) 20:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Music of the Czech Republic
Music of the Czech Republic is slated for inclusion on the WP 0.7 CD, but the article is in really bad shape. It wasn't even in WP:CZECH; I just now added it... I think you need to get two or three of your best editors working on that article. ;-) --Ling.Nut 11:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
With regards to your comments on Kraj:&#32;Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Gwernol 23:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

brno 'vandalism'
and you're an authority on english speakers in Brno because....? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.126.231 (talk) 12:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC).

Sudetenland and SdP
Ahoj, vidím, že se taky věnuješ problematice Sudet a Henleinovy Sudetoněmecké strany (SdP) - často se může stát, že nás Němci svými argumenty budou tlačit do kouta, a pro ten případ jsem na netu našel anglický přepis protokolů z Norimberského procesu s německými válečnými zločinci, kde je dobře popsáno, jak se Sudetoněmecká strana (SdP) podílela ve spolupráci s Třetí Říší na rozvracení Československa, jak se členové této strany dopouštěli zločinů. Možná by se hodilo vhodné části záznamu z procesu citovat na Wikipedii v článku "Sudetenland" a "Sudeten German Party" - a tady je ten odkaz na ty protokoly z procesu: http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/imt/tgmwc/tgmwc-02/tgmwc-02-11-05.shtml - zločiny SdP začínají na té stránce dole - pokračuje to několik stránek dopředu - předcházející část se věnuje plánu Fall Grün (plán útoku Německa na Československo). Dej mi když tak vědět, co si o tom myslíš. Díky.

Johannes Hevelius
You know. Space Cadet 00:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC) You da man. Space Cadet 21:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

What's going on
If one has 40k edits, you can bet some of them made some people very unahappy :( Feel free to read through the comments and statements, and add your own opinion; comments by uninvolved parties are very much needed. PS. I warned that user about incivility, hopefully he will moderate his behaviour.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I feel more secure than Darwinek: he broke 3RR several times, and that's a clear violation. I did nothing wrong - all they can do is portray my normal edits out of context as some general bad faith violations - I doubt they will be even able to frame a single edit of mine as a clear violation of any policy. That said, with those 40k edits it's possible they can dig a few like that (particulary from my early years with the project when I was learning the ropes) - everyone makes a mistake every now and often, and the more active you are, the bigger chance one may slip occasionally :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As a non-involved party, you can do it at general talk, or you can present specific evidence defending, supporting or accusing any party in evidence section.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Re
Ahoooj. Ziju :), akorat mam hafo veci do skoly. Myslim, ze to je proti pravidlum: Sockpuppets. - Darwinek 11:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * My to neprokazeme nijak, je treba kontaktovat nekoho s pravomoci "checkuser", aby to zjistil. WP:RFCU. - Darwinek 16:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for the Barnstar, it is an honor. I am going to do everything I can to get that Dominik Hasek article to featured status so be on the lookout for that. Sportskido8 07:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou
Thankyou very much, it is an honour :) Prague is a wonderful city that I've visited twice now so I have a special interest in Czech things, including your Eurovision songs! It's a big pity that Kabát came last :( I hope that CT will still want to participate next year...

sorry, i dont speak english.

RE:
sorry, i dont speak english

Image:Policemen and flowers.jpg
Hello Tulkolahten, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Policemen and flowers.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Tulkolahten/MySandBox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Prague Spring for FA?
Dobry den, Tulkolahten:

I don't think many people saw my message on the Czech WikiProject talk page, so now I'm writing to people individually. ;-) I have an idea to share with you: last year, a group of editors (in which I participated) turned Hungarian Revolution of 1956 from an utter worthless mess into an excellent Featured Article, and got it on the Main Page on the 50th anniversary of the uprising. With the 40th anniversary of 1968 coming up next spring, I would love to repeat that success with Prague Spring. I know it's a long time until the actual anniversary, but the sooner we start, the better. (It got pretty hectic with 56, we started in August and the anniversary was in October, which led to a mad dash to the finish--we barely made it.) Would you be interested in working on this? K. Lásztocska 19:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:KrálovskáHra.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrálovskáHra.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Copernicus
Tnx for letting me know. Perhaps more efficient would be to notify WP:PWNB and its German counterpart? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 17:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Since you posted the first alerts, I feel you should do the others (particularly as this would shield you from any allegation about canvassing, which recently became a popular insult :.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 10:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Double town names in Gregor Mendel
Hello Tulkolahten. I notice you have made some edits on Gregor Mendel with regard to the double town names issue, Brno versus Brünn, and so forth:, ,.

I'm taking the unusual step of writing to you directly, instead of posting on Talk:Gregor Mendel because that page can become very contentious.

Personally, I don't care very much whether we wind up with single-language names or dual names in the Mendel article for the various towns like Brno. Do you know of references to Wikipedia policy or previous Talk debates that would help to decide the issue? My impression is that we are to use the most common name used in *English* writings that refer to the specified town, during the time that the article refers to. At least, that is how the Gdansk/Danzig compromise seems to have worked out. So that means we don't care if a new nation arose in the area, with a different language, and renamed the town. We only care how English-speakers usually referred to the town. Our article on Moscow is not called Moskva, for example. The only full-length treatment of this point I could find is at Proper_names, though I don't think that resolves the Brno question in Mendel's article.

I am willing to consider Mendel to be 50% Germanophone and 50% Slavophone for purposes of applying the Danzig compromise with regard to town names. (Though for designation of his own nationality, he is Austrian, since that is the political unit that he was a citizen of, paid taxes to, etc).

Have you studied this in terms of policy, and do you have an opinion on how to resolve it? Thanks, EdJohnston 18:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Grand Duchy of Cracow move
Thanks for the RM, but I'd suggest withdrawing it: it only add a legitimacy to the undiscussed, POINT-ish, obviously controversial and no-consensus move of Matthead. I moved the article back to the orginal name which seems to have consensus - of course I'd not oppose a RM from GDoC to Großherzogtum Krakau or Grand Duchy of Kraków (actually, just reversing the RM to GDoC -> Großherzogtum Krakau may be a good idea to show how this move would lack support).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Okres Jeseník
Ahoj. Chci te poprosit, aby sis dal do watchlistu. User Bolekpolivka, ktereho znas z maleho sporu u clanku Hranicky, tam pridaval i neexistujici obce a vesnice, ktere jsou v soucasne dobe administrativne casti jinych obci. Dostal bloka na 24 hodin, ale muze se zase vratit. Sablona v soucasne podobe ukazuje pouze platne obce podle ceskeho zakona. Diky. - Darwinek 08:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Dik. Mas pravdu, hlavne za: "Typical Czech… probably a turncoat communist!!", co mi napsal na mem talk page :)). - Darwinek 08:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * To taky, ale v takovem pripade se musi dokazat, ze to je skutecne on, i kdyz podle zdraveho rozumu to je jasne. - Darwinek 09:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Vsak at ty clanky udela, zadny problem. Tohle je spis technicky problem. Pocet obci je jasne dany zakonem. - Darwinek 09:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

No myslim, ze je to tataz osoba. Styl psani je uplne stejny. Neverim, ze je to nejaky historik, ktery se 40 let zabyva touto oblasti. Spis mi prijde jako nejaky sebestredny adolescent, ktery o sobe furt tvrdi jak je amazing uzivatel a ja ze jsem vandal apod. Mohl bys prosim pozadat o zjisteni IP adresy obou tech uctu na WP:RFCU? Diky. Myslim, ze pouze za sockpuppeting a to, ze ho vyuziva v tzv. "content disputes" muze byt zablokovany. Pozadal bych o to ja, ale myslim, ze jsem vic namoceny do tohodle "sporu". Ty jsi vic nestranny. Diky moc. - Darwinek 12:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Uz jsem pozadal o zakroceni na RFCU. Pevne verim, ze dojdeme pravdy. Zatim nechme tu sablonu na pokoji, i tak ho driv nebo pozdeji zablokuji. Na tvem miste bych pozadal toho uzivatele, aby se ti nezapojoval nezvane na tvuj talk protoze to smrdi WP:STALKem, ma totiz v oblibe tak cinit. - Darwinek 15:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Aspon se ukazalo, ze je to sprosty lhar. Naprasil jsem ho adminum, ocekavam positivni odpoved a delsi blok. Je neuveritelne jak je tento uzivatel arogantni a prolhany. Ted uz mu nelze verit ani slovo. - Darwinek 20:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Just to clarify this for you... My Czech colleague told me that you are wondering about my nationality and suggesting that weissundblau and I are one person. Sorry to disappoint. Although we both work for the US DOS in Prague I am in my sixties and born in Germany, while weissundblau is 29 and native of Washington, DC. I changed the name of the Jesenik template, so there shouldn’t be further issues!Bolekpolivka 12:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Weissundblau dostal bloka na trvalo. Bolekpolivka jenom 48 hodin za opetovne poruseni 3RR. Vsadil bych se, ze za dva dny tu bude zas skodit jako doposud. Kdybys videl jeho edity driv nez ja, tak zakroc. Pak dostane dalsiho bloka. - Darwinek 21:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)