User talk:Tullio65

Welcome!

 * }

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Corinne Le Poulain has been reverted. Your edit here to Corinne Le Poulain was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/CorinneLePoulainFanClub) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Stop making changes to articles without an explanation and without a source as you did to Willi Boskovsky and Vienna New Year's Concert. At least in the case of Boskovsky, your change to his tenure as concertmaster contradicts the source that is already in the article. Also, if you are going to edit at Wikipedia, use edit summaries to explain your edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Vienna New Year's Concert shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''I've opened a topic at the article Talk page. Please come and explain what you're doing there, and why you think these edits are justified.'' Bbb23 (talk) 00:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)