User talk:Tullyisabelrobinson

December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Arbor Day, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Contribution reverted at swap spread‎
I have reverted your good faith contribution at swap spread‎ because it contained too many errors. This may be discouraging, but I encourage you to view it as a learning opportunity. There is a lot to learn here at Wikipedia about how articles are formatted. The best thing to do is to take a look at high-quality articles in your field to see how they are formatted, and copy the way that headers, references, and sections are set up in that article. I can recommend Bid–ask spread and Market maker, for example. I recommend that you add your text and references back to swap spread‎, saving your changes after each paragraph or two, and I will check your edits for errors. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)