User talk:Tuneap129

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Niwot High School
Hi Tuneap129. As I have removed the claim you made on Niwot High School, I will reiterate parts of the explanation I have given to other editors who have attempted to add the same allegation. Wikipedia's Biographies of Living Persons policy mandates that any controversial information on any living person on any Wikipedia page must supported by a reliable source. While you did add a source to the article, almost none of your allegations (especially the most controversial ones) have been supported by the faculty bio on the NHS website. The point of citing a source is to prove that Wikipedia's information is backed up by published, reliable facts and experts; there is no point to citing a source if it doesn't support any of the information you are adding. Wikipedia's Verifiability policy states: "...any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material" (emphasis mine). If you have a complaint to make about a particular teacher, Wikipedia is not the place to post it. There are proper administrative channels for that.

On a positive note, thank you for removing the vandalism introduced by an IP editor in this edit. You are welcome to improve Wikipedia by reverting vandalism, adding reliably sourced information, and removing dubious claims, but please do not add controversial allegations that you don't really have a reference to support. Thank you. Altamel (talk) 03:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)