User talk:Tupur16

Proposed deletion of Box Cricket League


The article Box Cricket League has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in the clause "game that is widely considered by independent reliable sources to be notable, outside routine coverage of each game". All references seem to be from PR publications due to involvement of actors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC) thanks for ur concern but for ur kind information I want to tell u that it is a popular tv show and I think a popular TV show's article should not delete from wikipedia and the article could be improved also.That's why I am removing the the deletion template from the article. Thank u again.

Nomination of Box Cricket League for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Box Cricket League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Box Cricket League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, I'm Savonneux. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Islamic views on slavery, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Savonneux (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Khaleda Zia edits
Your recent edits at Khaleda Zia were not very helpful. It's apparent there's an ongoing dispute about her age, but this is addressed in the section on Birthday controversy. If you wish to discuss the matter, the article's talk page already has an open discussion. But repeatedly making the change to cater to your worldview, is not helpful. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Harshvardhan Kapoor
You haven't explained your blanking.Xx236 (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Doubtful notability.
 * Probably grammar errors.Xx236 (talk) 10:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Tulsidas
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Tulsidas without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 12:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhritarashtra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandhari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ae Dil Hai Mushkil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked from editing. Barthateslisa (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Sources, use of PBUH etc
Hi - please read MOS:ISLAM and WP:RS to understand why I reverted you. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asiya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mary and Imran. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion
Please don't !vote delete, nominators can't do that. I hope you aren't involved with the new editor there. Doug Weller talk 08:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shivani Surve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Copyright issue
Your addition to Vikram Singh Chauhan‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Nomination of Million Dollar Girl (TV series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Million Dollar Girl (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Million Dollar Girl (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 22:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Janna Na Dil Se Door.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Janna Na Dil Se Door.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)