User talk:TurbineMidnight

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! nonsense ferret  14:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Further to your query on my talkpage, I have now corrected the review, it was the lyrics that I felt were very likely to be infringing someone's copyright - it is not normal practice to include these in articles. I have restored the other items of the page, but have to decline the page in its current form due to not being clear that the references provided are reliable sources.  For information of what constitutes independent reliable sources see WP:RS. You are of course free to resubmit at any time, but I'd advise improvements in terms of the references are necessary to establish notability before acceptance is likely.  Hope this makes sense --nonsense  ferret  16:13, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Further to your additional query on my talkpage, you are free to resubmit your article for consideration at any time, but I have to advise you that without multiple references to significant independent coverage in reliable sources then it is unlikely that your article will be accepted - see WP:GNG. Regarding the other article you have referred to, I have only had the quickest of looks, but it does not appear ever to have been reviewed, and I would question whether it meets the necessary criteria of notability - the only coverage seems to be in blogs.  If notability is not establishable, then it is very possible that this article will be nominated for deletion. --nonsense  ferret  10:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sparks Nevada, Marshal on Mars concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sparks Nevada, Marshal on Mars, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sparks Nevada, Marshal on Mars


Hello TurbineMidnight. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sparks Nevada, Marshal on Mars".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)