User talk:Turdman88

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 17:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Communism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Communism was changed by Turdman88 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95017 on 2010-11-24T17:21:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jermaine Jackson, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. some jerk on the Internet (talk) 17:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Harry Hill, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Harry Hill was changed by Turdman88 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97187 on 2010-11-24T17:36:52+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelsey peplow


A tag has been placed on Kelsey peplow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — focus 17:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
__NOINDEX__ Lady  of  Shalott  17:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)