User talk:Turduckenrawgabbit

October 2020
It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account.

In addition to the above, Wikipedia content needs to be written from a neutral point of view, whereas the content you added to the article Bob Lord was certainly not neutral, being written to promote and extol his virtues. In fact, a second reason why copying content from other web sites is usually inappropriate, even on the rare occasions when there is no copyright problem, is that text from a business or other organisation's site about itself, people who work for it, and so on, is very rarely written neutrally. JBW (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)