User talk:Turian/Archives/2010/March

Protection
I saw your comment of the protection page for Wrestlemania 26 and I think what you should do is go and ask one of the admins personally rather than wait around for one to stumble across it The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw. –Turian  ( talk )  19:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Semiprotection
✅ :-) - Philippe  21:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Pitt, Cena, and Orton
Hey Turian, how you been? Listen, I was going to thank you for wanting to help me out with Pitt's FAC on the FAC, but something was telling me not to do that, so. But I'm glad you wrote to me. :) You're interested in wrestling? I didn't know that. I haven't seen you around that's why. As the main contributor to Orton's article, I'd love too, and I'm down with Cena's as well. Though, the one problem is the sources in both article. There's some sources that will be a problem at the FAC. I've been trying to fix the ref. issue in Orton's. Both articles need to be written from an out-of-universe perspective, which I believe they are, but I know in Orton's article that there's some jargon it, so. I'll work on that, and I guess you can do the copy-edit. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, no wonder. :) Same here, friends got me into wrestling, so. I stopped watching it when it was revealed to me that it was fake and stuff, but restarted watching it in 2006. For example "face", jargon, and a term that will confuse some people, we substitute it with "fan favorite", catch my drift? They are, I mean some articles have jargon on it. I had wanted to get Shawn Michaels' article to FA, so I ended up removing any jargon and explained some stuff around, just for that. At the wrestling project it was decided that we should go by the OOU style. I mean, I go by it, some do too. Sources like "Online World of Wrestling", "PWWEW", "Lords of Pain", "411mania" should be avoided. Don't worry, though, I'll take care of the source issues. That's good that your back. Also, keep an eye on Cena's article cause some user ended up reverting your edits, though I ended up undoing them. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool, didn't want you to be confused. Alright, though, be careful, you know, it's the FAC and stuff. Though, if you're good at paraphrasing quotes, that'd be great, cause that was just brought up in the FAC. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm keeping my faith that it stays that way. Go for it, if there's anything that puzzles you let me know about it, maybe I'll be of good assistance. Sure, though, I ended up removing it from watchlist during the weeks leading up to the Elimination Chamber PPV. Yeah, that's been going on for a while now. If it happened, then it's added. There's been discussions/arguments about this. IDK if the consensus was to add the results, or add the results with a ref. that supports the claim, before the actual airing of SD. Source, you can probably check out on WrestleView or PW Torch, cause they report on it, if Matt Hardy indeed won to qualify in the MITB match. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what I heard, that it leaves too many spaces. Alright, I appreciate it if you can fix this, I'm kind of exhausted took an exam today and gotta go study. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  00:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, you're a better expert, in writing and stuff, than me, would this ---> "Promoting Fight Club, Pitt said that the film was not necessarily to take one's aggressions out on someone else, but that the idea is to get in there 'have an experience, take a punch more' and see how you come out on the other end" work? I know it's dumb, but there's another request to somehow "cut down" some of Pitt's quotes... some. Oh, and I went through Pitt's article and I didn't find excessive space, just on the Humanitarian causes, but I ended up getting that yesterday. :) --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Done, and thanks for your suggestion. TBH, I don't know how much "cutting" we have to do in the article. It's understandable to what Brian is saying, you know, making the article sound professional if we have it this way. Oh well, we might as well do this, right? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:American Idol
The changes I made fall under WP:BRD. The consensus on the talk page is that tables were good, but not necessarily that those were the best tables since some changes were already made to the tables since they were first introduced. I explained my changes in the edit summary that you reverted without explaining why the changes were not good. Aspects (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

the edit you just warned me over had a reason for removal on it. I can look at the history and see it. It's right there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.176.107 (talk) 01:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

The Soviet Union no longer exists
The Soviet Union has ceased to exist for the past twenty years, stop reverting the Russian flagicon back to the Soviet one. Took time to do that okay! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chnou (talk • contribs) 02:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, how do I answer to my own talk page :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doson (talk • contribs) 03:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem.. I'm very NEW to Wikipedia :)

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

I was asking about the first point. How do I reply back via my Talk page

Thanks

Doson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doson (talk • contribs) 03:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reverts
You're fast. You reverted the vandal edits before I saw the "new messages" banner for them. :) ctzmsc3&#124;talk 04:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, i made that on Book of Job... is this the way to talk to you guys? if not show me how.--Krashlia (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Mistagged page
You seem to have mistagged here :)  Roger Davies  talk 05:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, I blame Twinkle. –Turian  ( talk )  05:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Archiving
Hey there! I was just passing through (I forget why) and I noticed that you've got a bot doing your archiving for you. Very sensible! However, your archive box at the top seems to be pointing to the wrong place as it's a redlink. Feel free to copy some of the stuff from mine, which might help you with indexing so that you can find things in the future etc, as you archive to monthly pages like I do. Cheers! Ged UK  11:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was meaning to get to it a while ago, but I finally did it today. :) –Turian  ( talk )  08:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oo, I like that box, I might have to steal borrow it myself! Ged  UK  08:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I know!
I know what you're talking about, but the title is SmackDown exclusive since a SmackDown superstar is holding it. If a Raw superstar is holding it, it would be Raw exclusive. So the WWE title belongs to SmackDown.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Delivered: 21:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

I'm Sorry!
Sorry, the info was correct, but the source the user used was in another languange. I was only removing it until someone had the source in english. I know I've been on here since 2007, but I've never been on here fully until now. Sorry for all the trouble I've made.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 01:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

RE:Italics on American Idol (season 9)
Hi User:Turian,

I definitely would want to join in, or even, create the discussion, but I  don't necessarily understand what you mean exactly.

The italics look fine on the article to me.

Could you explain to me exactly what it is you are talking about?

Thanx!

ATC. Talk 02:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC)