User talk:Turkla

WP:NOT
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor is it for things you made up one day. -- Merope 17:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Ethocide
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — PyTom 18:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Ethocide
I have added a "" template to the article Ethocide, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

I've switched it over to a proposed deletion. I believe you when you say that you were the author of the letter, however, that makes the article original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. — PyTom 18:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

copyright
Pending identification, I have removed the article as a copyright violation--it must be documented in the full former manner, using your real name. Be aware that this is under GFDL, giving anyone permission to reuse and modify the material in any way they please, even for commercial use. We would also need an assertion that you, rather than the Boston Globe, own the copyright. After you do, It will then of course be subject to deletion for other reasons, such as the one  PyTom  mentions. Unsupported essays do not in general belong in wikipedia, and articles on the use of a new word need evidence that the word has been used by others in the sense intended. DGG 19:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)