User talk:Turtill

Reversion of edit to Transport in Ipswich
I reverted your recent edit to the Transport in Ipswich article because it contained strong criticism without supporting citations and because I felt failed the NPOV test. If you want to contribute to the article then please choose your stance a little more carefully and if you are going to make a bold statement then it absolutely must be cited by a good reference. There is a lot of useful content that you could usefully add to the article so do please take another shot at it, but try to add relevant and balanced provable facts rather than opinion. Thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * If you have a problem with anything I post I would appreciate the common decency of a mails stating your case first. Of course you could just leave my post alone and add your version and let readers make up their own minds. turtill@gmail.com (comments by User:Turtill)


 * Wikipedia has its own established etiquette, which is to first ensure that the article reads well and if necessary to have a discussion about the content of the article on the article's talk page or the contributor's talk page as appropriate. It is not appropriate to use Wikipedia article for a public discussion about an issue. I have also moved your further comments from the article to the talk page. PeterEastern (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I have corrected your claim about there being many footpaths in Ipswich because the statement is inaccute and very missleading. turtill