User talk:Tuspm/Archive 2

spongebob characters
I removed a character from Characters on the Street to Characters with Jobs.
 * Okay. Thanks for informing me of this. Also, for the future, newer discussions go at the bottom of the page but no big deal. -- Tu s  pm (C 23:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

none
how do you become a moderator or whatever you are? esp. if your only 15?
 * No age limit to become a Wikipedian. --Tuspm  Talk 01:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

My reply
Here is my reply: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bosniak#Bosniak.27s_Reply:#Bosniak.27s_Reply:
 * Um, okay. Thanks, I guess. Don't see why you need to add a link here when you could've just posted your actual reply here, but whatever. --Tuspm  Talk 01:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Cody Linley
Hi, do you think you could make a page on Cody Linley. I know he already has one, but is there a way it couldbe improved, say, more pictures or something?

He is HOTT
 * Left a message on your talk page. Why not think about becoming a Wikipedian and contribute? --Tuspm  Talk 01:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

sorry dtm17

Fast Change!
Wow you changed my quack quack edits so quickly! Is that automatic or do you have to manually do it (even if it's just making a quick review and clicking revert? Anyway, it was funny to me at the time.  However, I've made some serious edits to that article to improve it.  Hope you like them!


 * I use an anti-vandal software called VandalProof. Using it, I can receive a list of recent changes and when I spot vandalism, I can revert it and warn the user with a click of a button. That's how I was able to revert your change so quickly. Anyway, thanks for contributing. --Tuspm   Talk 01:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I'd just like to point out that it's not perfect: it reverted my correction on the Lake Waiau page. I had accidentally put four quotes instead of three (to make a word bold), corrected it immediately after originally writing the entry, and found it changed back a minute later.  Not sure why this appeared to be vandalism.  KarlM 06:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That's actually my fault. I didn't use VandalProof for that edit. I was stub sorting and I must've done something by accident. Sorry. --Tuspm  Talk 16:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Chaoscactus
You left a warning that their article Dexbitch had been nominated for afd. This is not true. I have nominated it for speedy deletion and the correct course of action for the user (if they wished to keep the article) would be to insert hangon into the body of the article. --IslaySolomon 00:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoops! My mistake. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I am still getting used to some of these codes on Wikipedia. --Tuspm  Talk 00:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Changes to SWIFT article
Thanks for the heads-up about only marking things as minor edits when they actually are, but I don't know how I could have marked those changes as minor, because I wasn't logged in - according to this article:  "Users who are not logged into Wikipedia are not permitted to mark changes as minor because of the potential for vandalism. The ability to mark changes as minor is another reason to register."

But, I've only been using wikipedia for a week or so, let me know if I am missing something (which is very likely).124.157.144.83 17:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)j (aka 124.157.144.83)
 * Oh! I didn't realize that. I'm still getting used to Wikipedia as well. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --Tuspm  Talk 13:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

No worries. Later, 124.157.144.83 14:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)j

Sorry!
Sorry Tuspm!! That was my kid brother. We sincerely apologize. We'll be good now!!!

P.S. Snowmobiles are my favorite, want to go snowmobiling sometime?
 * First of all, I don't know if you're lying or not. Second of all, your IP address will still be reported to the admins and possibly be blocked. Just because you say you're sorry doesn't change the fact that your IP address vandalized many pages and userpages. --Tuspm  Talk 01:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Minor edit
Thanks for the advise. Normally I do as you said, but some time ago by some mistake all my edits were marked m automatically. (meladina 16:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC))

Sock Puppet
Thank you for fixing my most unfortunate typo (Articles for deletion/Cute gurlzz ). Such language is not my style. Rklawton 01:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Area code 330
I don't know if VP allowes other db codes but the correct one for this page would of been. Just thought you would like to know. TTFN. Whispering 00:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know how I missed that. VP does have the code but I must've missed it somehow. Thanks! --Tuspm  Talk 00:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

TuspmBot
Just a quick thought about this, after the fact: you might want to look at using AWB for spelling correction, if you have at any point a resumed interest in doing this. Technically I don't think a manually-approved use of software requires explicit "bot approval" as such, and perhaps it's also better to be left to run without a bot flag, though doubtless running it past some other people to determine consensus for it is a good plan in any event. Alai 17:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

ctyi
Hey did you go to CTYI this summer. User:Shanequinlan01
 * Huh? I think you have me confused with someone else. --Tuspm  Talk 19:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. User:Shanequinlan01

My RfA


Regarding my RfA, I would like to thank you for voting. Although you opposed my RfA, thank you for letting me know what points you feel I should work on. I wasn't really too suprised when my RfA didn't pass, nor am I disappointed. I will keep trying to do my best here at Wikipedia and I hope you will vote again on my next RfA. Paul Cyr 22:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Daniel 123's RfA
I can't quite work out what happened with Daniel 123's RfA. It appears to have been something he was working on yesterday, but you actually added it to the WP:RFA list. Did you talk with him about it? I ask because the RfA hasn't been properly accepted and usually wouldn't be added to the RfA list until it was. Thanks, Gwernol 22:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * In fact, is Daniel 123 even aware that his RfA is on the list? Gwernol 22:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I understand it was a good faith effort on your part. My only worry was that RfA nominees often create their RfAs several days or even weeks before listing it, so they can work on it until its ready to list. If someone else finds an unlisted RfA and puts it on WP:RFA early it could go down in flames because the nominee hasn't finished working on it and it appears that they have created a malformed nomination. I don't think that happened in this case, but as you say its best to explicitly as before doing this yourself. No harm done in this case I think. Thanks for taking the time to contact me. All the best, Gwernol 20:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

rv
Fast rv! You had the fastest time of 1 minute! 149.142.243.83 22:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, thanks...? -- Tu s  pm (C 23:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, Tuspm, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC Tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

The one and only Cliff 23:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Gametalk
I wasn't messing with the Gametalk.com page, I was just telling the truth about the site.
 * It was complete, 100% vandalism. See here. -- Tu s  pm (C 00:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Gametalk
So, it has to be truthful, but it can't be harsh. That how GT is, many people who go there agree. Its a site thats falling apart and overran by n00bs, but ok, I'll leave GT article alone.

i don't get it
why do you want to delete my article? can you tell me what's wrong with it before you delelte it?
 * Please read the comments I left. You didn't even mention which article, so I don't know exactly what I said. -- Tu s  pm (C 13:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you so much! RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 04:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

203.217.29.165
Just FYI, you had recently issued a last warning to User_talk:203.217.29.165 for his vandalism to Red Blood Cell. Since that time, that IP address has vandalized numerous times. In a brief and random review of contributions from that IP address, I found none that there has been further vandalism. (See the edits to United States and Ipswich Town F.C.) It appears this IP address may be a candidate for further review and/or action. Arx Fortis 03:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I thank you for bringing this to my attention and I will keep a close eye out for . Unfortunately, I am not an administrator so I can't block users. But I can put this user on my watchlist and on my blacklist at VandalProof so if any more vandalism comes up, I will report them to the AIV. -- Tu s  pm (C 13:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

my RfA
Thanks for your opinions on my RfA. With a final vote of (62/0/1), my RfA passed, and I am now an Administrator. I will work hard to ensure that the tools entrusted to me will not be abused. Happy editing! -- Firsfron of Ronchester 22:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome messages
Please be careful, as you have left Welcome messages for at least two indefinitely blocked users in the past few minutes. Ryūlóng 21:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll try to be more careful but how do I know who to leave welcome messages to? How am I supposed to identify sockpuppets and things of that nature? -- Tu s  pm (C 21:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Do a quick blocklog check? Ryūlóng 21:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)