User talk:Tutmosis/archive1

Welcome!
Hello, Tutmosis/archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing! EEDFCC

-- Sango  123  17:00, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Television Broadcasts Limited
I've had to revert your edits on this article; the "obvious spelling and grammar errors" weren't, of course; they were perfectly correct British English, which you changed to U.S. English. Articles should be left in the style of English in which you find them unless their subject matter is relevant to a certain style (you can change to "programme" to "program" in an article on U.S. television) or the style is inconsistent (in which case it should be made uniform in line with the style used by the original editor). --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 14:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Comments
Thanks for your kind words. Glad to be of help :-) - Zerida 09:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Tutmosis, I want to lend a hand in adding to the Bay Area Hip hop scene. My personal interests are the Hyphy movement and Thizz, but there is sooooo damn much culture and what not, from the 80's with Too Short - Thizz Nation now. I figure, you being the king of the wiki Hop hop project, you might know (or have advice on) how to put together a team on getting this on there. As for as the to do list, subdivisions and what not. What would be the best way to learn about how to put something like this together? Thanks for any advice you may have. Carlos 18:41, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Dragon Ball names
There was a discussion awhile back (I think it was on one of the category pages) and it was agreed to use the original Japanese names where possible. Beowulph 21:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

List
Ah okay, I get what you're saying; a merged list for each category of characters. I responded on the page :) Deckiller 03:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

My Changes

 * No Problem, I think that when I changed those pages in the begining, I should have warned you. By the way, I think that the pages look better now. Muchi

Template
Hey, a lot of us have agreed to place the SWProject template on the project pages that don't have any significant problems; just thought I'd give you a heads up. Deckiller 19:59, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh it's okay, most of those articles are good ones anyway. Deckiller 20:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, most of the articles you tagged are decent articles. Deckiller 20:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, sounds good. Deckiller 20:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

JA Template
Hey, thanks for the comment. I just used the color scheme from most of the other SWU templates, but I think Wookiee is going through and making them all black and yellow. Deckiller 20:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * What do you think about the character section? Think we should add a few more/take away Ona Nobis and Zan Arbor? Deckiller 20:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Or we could just give them a section in the minor villains lists, since I think Zan arbor also appears in a few other sources. Deckiller 20:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Spelling corrections
I'm sorry to be so blunt but it seems very strange to me for somebody to revert a spelling correction to an article without checking how the word is actually spelled. I'd just like to understand what would cause you to feel it's appropriate to revert good changes without checking that the revert was actually something bad. Receive is actually spelled this way, and not 'recieve', as a quick look in any dictionary will tell you. I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just trying to understand what compels a person to do such a thing, as it seems utterly bizarre to me. -- Rediahs 07:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It wasn't me, but it's okay, I'm not angry, I was just fairly confused. Peace! -- Rediahs 22:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Artist Response
Well I'm looking for something rather simple and square to go inStar Wars Portal and/or User Star Wars WikiProject. I can't be to complex because of the small size. It kinda of needs to be our Wikiproject's logo in a sense. Try using Image:Nuvola apps package games.png for inspiration. Jedi6 04:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars voting
Please make sure you vote for the Star Wars selected article, list and picture by Monday. Jedi6 10:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

MoS
Hey, I've been taking some notes and whatnot. I'll try and get a draft up tonight, but that depends on whether or not I work on my college stuff :) Deckiller 00:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's a cool box. By the way, here is your edit count: ^_^. You should post that on your userpage. Deckiller 00:10, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It also works like a search engine. Here's mine: . Deckiller 00:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks ^_^ I might go for the big 10k tonight, not sure yet :) Deckiller 00:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I edit all around, basically. My first major task was adding lots of information to Xenosaga and Xenogears, merging all the information into lists, and so on. They still need a lot of cleanup, since I almost abandoned them for a time ^_^. Right now, I'm working on a template for King Crimson. Deckiller 00:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * ^_^ Thanks, I see that you're a rising wikipedian too. I just finished that template, here it is: Template:King Crimson. Deckiller 00:39, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's the general navigation template for bands, so it was pretty easy to modify and add the albums. Deckiller 00:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Lol, yeah. I need to archive my talkpage again pretty soon, anyway. Deckiller 00:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

re:congrats
Hey, thanks for the message ^_^. Sorry I haven't been around TOO much for the last two days, I've been on a SEMI-wikibreak, meaning only 40-50 edits per day :) That'll pick up soon. Deckiller 17:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey there
Hey, nice work with the weapons/pronoun edits so far. Did you get a chance to read what I said about the video games on the talk? I think you'd probably be interested in giving me a hand with that. Thanks ^_^ Deckiller 22:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool. The only thing I recommend putting back is the sentence about disintegration for the disruptor rifle; I believe I read about that somewhere. Deckiller 22:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

American/British Spelling
The old American vs. British style debate. Since Star Wars is an American product we would use American spelling. Also to check what links to a page just go to the first link on the left side of the page below the search bar. It says What links here or you can go to Special:Whatlinkshere/pagename. Jedi6 05:01, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

New pages
I just created the Darksaber (novel) page, and a semi-complete Children of the Jedi page. Next up: The New Rebellion. Feel free to take a look and review ^_^ Talk to ya later. Deckiller 01:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I think the Darksaber one should be a model novel page for the project; It is complete, and I was able to do it in under an hour. This format is a great way for us to pump out star wars novel pages in a short period of time ^_^ Deckiller 01:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * By the way, any other novel pages you want to see created? Deckiller 02:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey. Yeah, I've been planning it out. I'm checking out your comment on the talkpage in a second (SWU fan club meeting right now ^_^) Deckiller 02:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

MoS
Looks good, thank you. Deckiller 15:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

re:11k
^_^ thanks! Deckiller 01:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * MoS is on hold for a bit as my RfA and a few other things wind down. That should be up by the weekend. Other than that, I'm planning on a few more merges and some things to put on the things to do page. Deckiller 02:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the X-wing!!! Jedi6 -(need help?)  19:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I forgot
I forgot, wasn't there some sort of template I promised to makea while age. Jedi6 -(need help?)  03:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I suppose I'll make that one now. Jedi6  -(need help?)  03:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Dear Tutmosis:

You have the honor of being the 11th person to respond to my survey!

Thank you for your participation. Your responses to the survey are much appreciated!

The final essay should be posted on my user page no later than March 27. Stay tuned!!!

Shuo Xiang 01:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Table change
You add class="wikitable" to the Timeline of astronauts... What does it do? I can't see any difference? Rmhermen 19:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Huh?
I see you voted to merge at Articles for deletion/Alkanian Sector and Articles for deletion/The Tritithes. Does this mean they really exist somewhere, and I'm just searching for the wrong things on Google? BryanG 03:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Orr (surname)
Thank you. I had been worried that the article would be challenged on notability, though I had seen that a similar article, McCarthy, seemed acceptable. --Mal 22:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Bot
(rmv erronous warning)
 * Thanks for reverting my blanking of my own work. Tutmosis 00:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hence its a bot, if you want to remove the table feel free, that kind of stuff happens so rarely its not funny, less than 0.01% of the time I think -- Tawker 00:38, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for not freaking out, It's a balance game with that sort of thing, I'll see if I can work out a check that would prevent that -- Tawker 00:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

'The Price is Right' reedits
I removed the original paragraph because not only did it need to be broken down into several paragraphs, but was extraordinarily long and it seem to lack a neutral POV. It can always be reverted by the Wikieditors or the original author if something was done incorrectly -- Cincgreen

Collaboration of the Week
Arggg. Why did LucasArts have to make three things all named Clone Wars. Its so confusing. Jedi6 -(need help?)  02:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes we could have Clone Wars, Clone Wars (TV series) and The Clone Wars (video game). I think I'll add the appropiate tags to these pages. Jedi6  -(need help?)  03:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Also I requested moves on both talk pages plus the other List of LucasArts Star Wars games that I was working on and placed them at Requested moves. Please respond. Jedi6  -(need help?)  03:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree, Eminem is NOT black, nor is Bob Barker. 1/3 of the "Barker Beauties" is though, contrary to popular belief. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valloway (talk • contribs)

Help has arrived
You wanted some help, here I am! How can I help you? You can ask your questions right here, and I will respond.--Commander Keane 14:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Mmm, Lego Star Wars: The Video Game. The edits seems to be strange, but assume good faith and assume the editor is trying to improve the article. Try to talk with them on their talk page (and encourage them to get a Wikipedia account). I'm not sure if it vandalism, because I don't know anything about the subject. The article's talk page may be another good place to discuss the changes - maybe someone who knows something about the matter can comment.--Commander Keane 14:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I dropped a note at User_talk:70.232.103.49 for you.--Commander Keane 15:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
^_^ Thanks! Not sure how long it will last, but I'll be taking advantage of this time. &mdash; Deckill e r 23:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

About the Hip-Hop edit...
I know almost nothing about Hip-Hop. I edited that page (I think it was 50 cent) because it had been vandalised, pure and simple. So, I must turn down your offer. Thanks, though.-- digital_me ( Talk ) (  Contribs  ) 01:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Hip Hop
Hi there, thank you for your offer regarding the Hip Hop project. Unfortunately, I'm not exactly an expert on the subject and I only edited the article to revert vandalism. Anyway, good luck with the new project! Hope I can help out some way. - Tangotango 02:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make false accusations at me I never touched the Odyssey article, and the few edits I have made were just spelling corrections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.201 (talk • contribs)

hip hop for ever
sure I'll join....its about time people start taking hip hop seriously on wikipedia.--chub 04:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

portal
Sounds like a good idea. I reverted your changes to the intro because, frankly, the hip hop culture page centers on a 1980's view of hip hop that ignores the fact that the music is the most notable thing these days.--Urthogie 08:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

yo
yo waddup man??i was wonderin if i can join ur hip-hop project. hit me bak iight??? keep da site pimpin--Freestyle.king 05:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

To Do list needs to be reformatted
I think each sub-section (specifically the stub list) needs to have their own section (the "==______==" header rather than the "===_____===" header). That way we can organize the stubs into seperate sub-catagories (i.e. album stubs, article stubs, etc.). What do you think?--chub 10:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Question
Hi Tutmosis. The way most portal colours are set is through a box-header sub-page. The New Zealand Portal colours can be edited from Portal:New Zealand/box-header. Thus, for the portal you are trying to create, you need to create a box-header. There are instructions at Portal.--cj | talk 14:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You didn't do that. I'm happy to help. Out of curiosity, what portal are you working on?--cj | talk 00:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

It's here!!!
Dear Tut:

And it's here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Announcing my CS 492 term-end paper: On Wikipedia — the Technology, the People, the Unfinished Work.

Thank you for all the kind help you have lent me during the paper-writing process!!!

Long live Wikipedia!!!

Shuo Xiang 22:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Collaboration
I'm eager to nominate Illmatic (which is currently being nominated for hip hop collaboration of the week) for FA-status, even though I feel that more can be done to improve it. I feel that with a collaborative effort from members of the hip hop wikiproject, we can bring up to FA status in no time. Do you think its time to close the votes for collaboration of the week, or should we leave it open for new members to weight their opinions in? --Chubdub 14:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

design specific dates when next article voting will take place, unless we want it weekly.''' Within a certain amount of days the article with the most votes wins.
 * Considering that the amount of votes recieved are small and took place in a span of several weeks (2-3 weeks if I can recall) I don't think it should be weekly (atleast not until we gain more members). Perhaps the voting process may need to be done on a monthly basis? After all, bringing an article to FA status is quite tedious.
 * see above

On further note, I think once a particular article has been selected, we should notify all the members of the collaborative effort. Thanks! --Chubdub 19:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

A new template should also be made to announce the current Collaboration, such as this: --Chubdub 21:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Looks great. Good Work! Have you made a time frame for when next article voting will take place? --Chubdub 15:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Definetely! A Hip hop peer review sound great. I'm certainly willing to be an active participant in that. Go for it!

On another note, how are things with recruiting new members to the project? I'd certainly be really to help --Chubdub 15:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

And will this peer review be accompanied with a rating sytem? --Chubdub 15:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Hopefully, once the project becomes further established, hopefully individual members will be willing to assume a more active role. And yes, there is still an immense amount of work that needs to be done (see the To-Do list) before we see significant signs of improvement to individual articles. But right now, we need to continue establishing the project. As for the rating system/peer review, I think the whole criteria system (lead, substance, pictures, references) sounds great! --Chubdub 15:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I am not experienced enough to adress such topics. However, I think the obvious choice would be to post the announcement in the project's talkpage or send it to the project's most active members and try to get feedback from them. --Chubdub 16:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Community Justice
Welcome to Community Justice!

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

CJ election reminder
Hi Tutmosis I noticed that you are not registered for voting or nomination in the CJ elections, and would like to remind everyone that '''all Candidates Must Submit Their Statement By April 23rd. Voting will begin April 24th, and end May 1st'''. More details on how to nominate yourself can be found HERE. I hope to see you at the elections!  • The Giant Puffin •  20:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning The Lion King
Hi, thanks for cleaning the article about The Lion King. I was about to cleanup the unnessesary wikilinks. :) Bye  --Starionwolf 04:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

new collaboration
Now that Illmatic has been inducted into FA-status, I think we should name rapping as our next collaboration and work on it in the coming weeks. Also, I believe we should create some sort of table which lists our featured articles with stars next to em... Chubdub 21:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

re: rapping
I think its time to announce rapping as our next Collaboration. On another note, what do you have in mind for a next collaboration. Its seems that Tupac Shakur would be our most logical candidate after the rapping article. P.O.N.Y. 13:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 416 821 8172

Machine translation
Hi, if you see the note on the talk page, I've been working on the article, and until problems (described in Wikipedia talk:Footnotes) are fixed in Cite.php, I'd like to keep using Footnotes3. There was also an HTML comment in the references section asking people to read the talk page before converting, I'm surprised you didn't see it. Anyway, if you'd really like to change the footnotes to Cite.php style, I'd ask you to look at. Thanks :) - FrancisTyers 22:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem :) - FrancisTyers 22:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Community Justice Newsletter
 Community Justice Newsletter

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! My first of the original kind! CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 02:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Hitlerian Civility
G'day there Tutmosis,

I appreciate your obvious strength of feeling here, but comparing CVU members to Hitler was way out of line. I'd appreciate it if, as a gesture of good faith, you struck out the comment. Cheers, fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 11:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for doing that. In response to your comments: it's not a matter of offending me (or any other person in particular); otherwise I could just say "hey, Tutmosis isn't here, I can say all the stuff that offends him now!"  It's a case of being civil and not making personal attacks; comparing those who want to delete a rather malformed and silly idea (note: I'm not among the ones arguing for deletion) to Hitler is rather uncivil, and could easily be taken as a personal attack.  I'm not always as civil as I should be myself, so I know how easy it is to shoot from the heart instead of the mind ... but it really makes everyone's time on Wikipedia a lot more pleasant if we're civil to each other. Thanks, fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The golden age of hip hop for deletion?
I see that The golden age of hip hop is up for deletion. I wonder what you think of this. P.O.N.Y. 17:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Hip Hop genre box
Is there any way I can edit the hip hop genre template to include Mafioso rap and Golden age hip hop Chubdub 20:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Concordia newsletter
 Concordia Newsletter Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.

Concordia is an organization of editors on Wikipedia that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.

We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.

If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.

Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Concordia/Do Not Spam.

Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel.

- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Article Help: Abdul Wali Khan
Hi! I am looking for help on wikipedia, I new here and need help on an article I am working on..it's about Pakistani opposition leader Abdul Wali Khan who passed away recently. I've gotten some positive feedback about it but generally I realise from comments that I need some serious help in copy editing it..any help you can provide and suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks --Zak 15:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * tut thanks I'm going through your critiques minus a few I can't fault em..thanks for taking the time to have a look I'll start editing and get back to you when I'm done ..

Thanks again --Zak 14:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Please help on Ancient Egypt
Posted by Pruneau 18:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team

hip hop collaboration.....
Yeah. I think its pretty clear that Rapping will not be nominated (unfortunately). So do you think it should remain the hip hop collaboration, or is it time to pick another article? Chubdub 20:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

You have a impersonator!
It seems that user User:Tutmosis. mimics your user and talk pages and vandalizes articles on military ranks. It is a sockpuppet of the long-term vandal Roitr (see User:Roitr/sockpuppetry)--Nixer 09:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to a vandalized version
If you want to resize images and improve the table appearance, please do it with not vandalized version. The versions you've edited in Ranks of the People's Liberation Army Navy and Ranks of the People's Liberation Army Air Force were vandalized by Roitr and unfortunately we can not always manage to revert all his edits before other users modify them. His versions are wrong and completely different from the proper ones. He inserts bogus ranks in the tables as long as completely wrong correspondence of military ranks from different countries. He has IP addresses starting with 88.155, 88.152, 88.153 etc. You can see other his IPs and edit patterns in User:Roitr/sockpuppetry. Please do not support vandalism.--Nixer 18:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

My bad
I tried merging two afds, I re-read multiple afds guide then realised it's the wrong thing to do. I won't try it again.-- A n d e h 02:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well there is a lot of dodgy edits happening all the time, I see your on guard though!-- A n d e h 02:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Enta Da Stage
I was wonderin' if you could through something on the Project: Hip Hop page about Enta Da Stage, so the hip hop heads can show some support for it's featured article nomination. --PDTantisocial 02:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:suggestion
Hey, that's exactly what I was pointing out; priority on an "out of universe" perspective with a basic "in universe" description. Actually, the entire reason I started the WikiProject was to ultimately push for this. It can easily be done for technology, creatures, and so on. Check out my sub userpages from my userpage; I'm starting the project from there. &mdash; Deckill e r 01:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Mercedes-Benz 450SEL 6.9 FARC

 * Hi there—Mercedes-Benz 450SEL 6.9 is currently on the Featured Article Removal list. Attempts to improve the article since its nomination for FA Review have been insufficient, by consensus.


 * I note that you have contributed to the article, and I wonder whether you're able to assist at this crucial stage. It would be a pity if the article were no longer featured after all of the work that was put into having it promited. Tony 05:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AMbroodEY/Fundy Watch
It's up for afd.--D-Boy 10:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar and encouragement! Dmoon1 03:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Punk music
Whats up? Hi, I'm trying to gather some more interest and support for the WikiProject Punk music. Please check out the topics and lets get our WikiProject to function better. Recently, I've taken an interest in the WikiProject hip hop and I consider that WikiProject to be better developed. I am now writing to usernames on the hiphopWP who might be interested in helping with the punkmusicWP. Hopefully we can all work together to improve articles relating to punk as has been done well with hip hop. Finally, I am trying to gather support and opinions concerning the punk house article and specifically the Theta Beta Potata article which is currently in AfD (x2) at Articles for deletion/Theta Beta Potata (second nomination). Please check it out and voice your opinion. Xsxex 09:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks
I will try. :) Thank you for writing.  --VKokielov 02:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Jake Gyllenhaal
Hi! You opposed the FAC of Jake Gyllenhaal because it had no filmography. Well, the filmography has now been puut back, so would you mind reconsidering or providing more critical points? Dev920 07:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello again. As you may know the FAc failed last time; it has since been rewritten by other editors, and I have renominated it. Would you mind giving it your support? Dev920 10:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Link
YOu are absolutely right, and any help you'd like to contribute in trimming and/or copyediting would be greatly appreciated :) Judgesurreal777 23:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * By all means, go for it :) Judgesurreal777 00:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Macedonian artifacts
I'm sorry, edit conflict.  /FunkyFly.talk_  18:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

DuMont Television Network
Hey Tutmosis!

Thank you so very much for your recent peer review analysis of Wikipedia's article on the DuMont Television Network. You really conducted a thorough review, and I appreciate that you checked all sections, added fact templates, and had a lot of comments to make. I will do my best to impliment your suggestions into the article. Thanks for looking at the article. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester  01:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would be really cool of your to do a copyedit of the fixes I make from your suggestions. I plan to start work tomorrow on the article (it's a bit late here tonight to start work); I do plan to hopefully get the article up for FA status by the end of the year, and your suggestions will certainly help. I also understand what you mean about a better timeline, and hope to incorporate that in better, too. Thanks again for everything. :) Best, Firsfron of Ronchester  03:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Hungarian Revolution of 1956
Thank you for reviewing the Hungarian Revolution article - you bring up a very valid point - one we have continuously debated - i.e. how to be accurately descriptive of the public sentiment without being too NPOV. The crux of the problem is that the event itself is the result of precisely these very strong (and very NPOV) feelings, which are noted repeatedly in the referenced documents (esp. the UN report). Only this strong emotion could persuade a small country to expel the Soviet occupation - certainly not calculated reason. We would certainly welcome your constructive comments and will take each one seriously. (I think you must have caught some of this back-and-forth precisely after posting your first comment). Consensus on the page, at lest, is that to avoid the emotional language would be to mislead the reader. If you can suggest a means of reconciling the conflict - i.e. achieving the best of both accuracy and NPOV then we are happy to hear it. Istvan 20:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. Ive begun to replace some of the more emotionally charged language as per suggestion. Most of these are to be found in the summaries at the top. I hope this is more acceptable now in this form.Istvan 21:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Dear Tutmosis, after days of ironing out POV/accuracy wrinkles, I would kindly invite you to re-visit the 1956 article for a fresh look - I think you will find it to be extremely well referenced. Thanks Istvan 08:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the very specific detailed concerns. We will attend to them straightaway.Istvan 16:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Extratropical Cyclone
See if the overhaul made overnight helps the article significantly. You've made some good suggestions so far. Thegreatdr 06:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert FAC
Ouch... Disrespectful? Don't bite! I'm still kind of new. After the peer review, those of us interested really started to make some positive changes on the article, removing the quotes and placing the Wikiquote box. Removing several unnecessary external links. The problem was that since he is such a popular figure right now, we had so many people coming in adding new useless information and nonsense and vandolism that we had to clean up. It turned out that there really weren't as many "serious" wikipedians interesting in doing the grunt work on the article. I understand and completely respect your objections. I would suggest however that in the future you leave comments to the article themselves, because honestly calling me "disrespectful" I took personally. I think that I've done a great deal of hard work on wikipedia and this was my first article that I had ever submitted for FA candidacy and I personally thought it met the criteria. I didn't know any better. Thank you.--Twintone 14:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Bizarre Ride II the Pharcyde
I have it up for featured nomination, if you could throw that on the bulletin, that'd be cool, cuz I haven't gotten any support/objections yet, people ignoring it. --PDTantisocial 06:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Bizarre Ride
Thanks brah. I know what you're sayin', but these peoples don't really get that with underground hip hop its hard to dig up all these newspaper articles and etc (if there ever were any), I did the same with Enta Da Stage so hopefully I can get it past. --PDTantisocial 02:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Check up
Hey, its been some time since the DuMont Television Network peer review and I just want to let you know I havent forgot about it. I see you still working on it and I intend to keep my promise and copyedit the article. So let me know when you finished. - Tutmosis 20:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note, Tutmosis. Yes, I am still working on your suggestions, and thanks for your promise. I will certainly let you know when I'm done, and plan to be finished in a few more days. Thanks for your patience. :) Firsfron of Ronchester  20:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Kiero
Hey, sorry, I don't know much about Kiero, other than three songs that existed on it (Rise Like The Sun (The Dawn), Ride Like The Sun (The Dusk), and Musical Essence) and the fact it was only available in Toronto for a short while. There's an interview here where K-os expresses interest in re-releasing it, but only after being allowed to tamper with and redo the songs. Other than that, I've only found a few mentions here and there on various websites, but no meaty info. (Rishi B 20:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC))

Hey again, I recently found some more info on k-os... seems in addition to Kiero, he had something called "Take You There"... it was an EP that contained the songs Take You There, and the Rise Like The Sun songs. Just the three tracks. It sometimes pops up on ebay, and according to a [k-os.forumsunlimited.com k-os fansite], it's legit. Apparently, it was distributed by an indie label (Pure) in the states, and is pretty hard to find (duh).(Rishi B 10:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC))

Sir Syed FAC
Hi Tutmosis - thank you my friend - I really appreociate it. I've got to say I was a bit frightened when this FAC didn't get a single comment for more than 36 hours! Rama's arrow 16:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, FA drives are the real way to fulfill Wikipedia's purpose. The best part is I end up learning a lot more while writing an FA! Many thanks again, Rama's arrow  17:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hey
Hi. I find that musicsquare.net is useful for worldwide chart positions (though it only goes back to 2003), and you can find U.S. chart positions at billboard.com. There is also a less well-known chart called the ARC Weekly Top 40, the official website for which is at rockonthenet.com. I should note that some of the information on top40-charts.com is inaccurate. As for choosing which ones to include, I'd recommend against including airplay or download charts because I think a country's main single chart is an adequate indicator of a single's popularity in that country - there's no point including three charts if one conveys essentially the same information. I do think it is good to include any relevant genre-specific charts; for example, in the U.S. you have the Pop 100, Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs and so on. Hope that helps. Extraordinary Machine 21:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Peer review/Web operating system/archive1
Hi, thanks for contributing to WOS. I've left a reply -- a request for a bit more -- on the Peer review/Web operating system/archive1 page. - JohnPritchard 11:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Settlers II Gameplay
Hey I heard you were working on Settlers II. I looked over the gameplay section, and it looks pretty good. I wouldn't call it cheesy; it's written from an out of world perspective, and I think it covers all aspects (probably the two biggest problems of gameplay sections). I've never played the game, but are their different sides you can be (I.E. axis and allies in WWII games)? That's really all I saw missing from the gameplay section (it's kinda hard to know what's missing if you haven't played the game, and it'd be pretty dumb for me to pull that "broad in coverage" junk.). Another thing that might be the reason that you called it cheesy was because most of the paragrapghs subjects were "the player." For example "During the beginning of the game, the main warehouse is the only building that has a radius granting the player territory. The player can expand his territory by building any of the three possible military complex's near the border of his current territory and sending atleast 1 soldier to operate the complex. A serf can become a soldier once a sword and a shield are constructed." could be "During the beginning of the game, only the main warhouse has the ability to grant territory for further growth. Territory can be expanded by creating one of three military complexs near territory borders. Each complex must have at least one soilder to continually operate the complex. Soilders can be created by constructing a sword and shield, and using them to upgrade a serf." I'm not great with prose or spelling, but the idea I was trying to convey was that the subject changes as the paragrapgh moves on. If you are talking about soilders and how cool they are and you want to move on to serfs, try to connect them. I know you've probably dealt with prose a thousand times, but I'm just trying to get across that prose is still there in RTS games. If you need more help with structuring video game sections, JimmyBlackwing helped me out a lot. You're doing a great job though. Keep up the good work. --Clyde Miller 22:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Well look at the orginal research stuff if you haven't already (good stuff there), but usually people are more leanent with what needs to be citied regarding video games. It goes case by case usually, but stats and actual ideas are usually citied. I think I may have citied some uneeded things in Empires, but I think it is usually better to cite more than less. If you say that soilders fight, don't cite it, but if you say that soilders can kill serfs better than other serfs, you might want to cite that. I dunno, it's kinda hard to define.--Clyde Miller 22:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I am quite surprised you understood that. As for after the FAC, I haven't really thought about it. If you need some help with Settlers I could give help out. I'm stil a relative noob here (under 1000 edits) and Empires is my first project. I don't know what to do next.--Clyde Miller 22:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Cool. Uh...have fun.--Clyde Miller 04:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 01:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Indian Navy Template
Excellent work. I did not know the code work and all. You did an excellent work by removing all the unwanted code and making it look nice. Even I had a thought of changing the colour to white but did not do it. I think the Motto looks somewhat smaller and the text to the links need to be in bold so that it looks attractive. I will do that.Thanking you.

The bold size did not work nicely. It looks very odd. So not making changes there. Chanakyathegreat 15:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks~
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! It is much appreciated. Chris Kreider 19:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks man
Dude, I really appreciate this. I don't know how many people would believe it, but I will value your barnstar and those others have kindly given me, "for life." More important than the star are the kind thoughts and the time you took to think of me. If I can ever be of assistance, just gimme a buzz. Cheers, Rama's arrow  00:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Tutmosis! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the tips and comments you have written on the article HSV Senator Signature —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Senators (talk • contribs) 02:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC).

Featured article candidates/NeXT
Your latest concerns have been addressed, as far as I can tell.

To answer your questions:
 * NeXTWORLD magazine is mentioned because it was the only magazine to cover NeXT's products - I think its of note.
 * The NeXT RISC Workstation is not the NeXTstation, the RISC workstation was an un-released project that was canceled and never finished.

Thanks for your help so far, — Wackymacs 15:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

What?
Oh god, an incidence twice repeated of shit. The fall of civilization is being brought about by "profanity-filled lyrics" on a trivial Wikipedia page!! I cannot prove it to you beyond simply saying I have heard this very chorus many times. If you say this is "original research," then I dare you to fastidiously scour the article for any signs of unsourced writing (especially the section to which I was adding on, as its origins seem rather "specious" by your definitions) and delete it to satisfy your pompous faux-authoritarian impulses. Otherwise, revert it to my version at once.

Itscml 02:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

What?
Dear Tutmosis, Mongoloid, Esq. Please accept my greatest condolences for your monumental stupidity. Did you read my message? If you're going to revert my edits for being "illegitimate," then you might as well revert the entire article, as it is not sourced. Good day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Itscml (talk • contribs) 21:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC).

Thanks from the Mount Lowe Railway
I really appreciate your insights to my article. In alot of cases I agree with you and was eager to make the changes. It is nice to know that more has to go than be added as missing.--Magi Media 03:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Dude
Dude who did you anger? I have your page on my watchlist, and it been vandalized several times the past couple days. Wassup?--Clyde Miller 00:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

fair use
A couple of points. Firstly, the issue of whether a free image can be created is a lot trickier than you seem to think. Is it really possible to create a free picture of J. D. Salinger (note that someone has challenged the fair use rationale of the current image, from a book cover by his daughter, and, so it'll probably get deleted soon enough)? In general, how easy is it to get a free picture of famous people? I think that the idea that the possibility of getting some famous person to release a photo on the GNU license (through wikipedia's "clout") should be totally off the table in terms of fair use criteria. If someone can get the person to do that, wonderful. But the possibility of this (vaguely present with every living person, and even with dead people, presumably) shouldn't actually cause us to delete existing images. The possibility of taking a picture of a famous person seems a priori similarly dubious - obviously there are exceptions, and there will be famous people it will be possible to get pictures of, but this is not easily possible to members of the general public in the way that, say, getting a picture of the Arc de Triomphe would be. Anyone in Paris can take a picture of the Arc de Triomphe and release it to wikipedia. To get a free picture of Tom Cruise is a lot tricker, and the conditions in which such a picture would be likely to be taken makes all the more likely that the picture will be awkward and poor and unprofessional compared to a promotional photo, which it would be perfectly legal for wikipedia to use. john k 10:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

k-os
I'm glad you see where the confusion came in now. If you need more copy editing on a different article in the future, let me know. Good luck with getting it promoted to featured! :) ~  ONUnicorn (Talk 20:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:vote
Hi - no I don't think there is any protocol on this. These are just discussion methods - straw polls - and its up to the people discussing it. The proposal is still current - not dormant enough to put a rejected tag. Rama's arrow 00:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Cricket
According to what I dug up back in 2004 when Cricket became featured you were one or the only primary author of the article. Looking over it today it seems to only have 3 references and and no in-line citation. I'm sure someone will nominate it for reviewin due time. I was wondering, are you planning on getting the article back in shape? - Tutmosis 23:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I wrote cricket article ages back, and a lot of editors have changed the content since then. I'm curious as to what references are needed for the article. Articles like these are the interpreted form of the laws of the game, and as such, and mentioned a couple of times in the past, do not have to conform to the inline ref frenzy that has struck most of our featured articles. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  06:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah true, history needs to be referenced and so do a couple of statistics. Thanks! =Nichalp   «Talk»=  00:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

k-os
Hi, I saw your message. I did some copyediting, but please check them whether I've made some wrong interpretations. I don't know much about music. I left also some issues at the Talk page. After you resolved that issues, I'll put my notes on the FAC page. Cheers. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 10:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's fine with me if you disagree with my copyedit. That's what Wikipedia is all about, right? You know the subject much better than me. Just a quibble comments: please avoid inexact time information, such as soon, now, currently, etc. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 08:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reporting the edit. The user seems to be a real bias Eminem fan (On the Eminem page he was writing stuff like "He has probably solver over 95 million and is the most popular rapper in the world) License2Kill 00:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

That's standard Wikipedia format License2Kill 05:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply
Okay, I just wanted to make sure it was an official title. -- Scorpion0422 19:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Deleted template not deleted
Hi - thanks for the message :). You can see the same question here (just two messages above yours).  In a nutshell, as the template is quite high use, I've put it in the holding cell, awaiting orphaning and deletion.  Thanks M a rtinp23 22:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem - it's comforting to know that a)people are spotting such things and b)they're mentioning them to the closing admin! Thanks M a rtinp23 22:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Featured candidates by month
Hi - I noticed you added the November list to Featured articles nominated in 2006. I've been doing these semi-automatically, with a script that parses through the nomination pages and creates the table. The script isn't perfect but it makes creating these tables a lot easier than doing it by hand. I generally update WP:WBFAN after updating the monthly list, with another script. If you're interested in updating these regularly (monthly) and have any interest in my scripts, please let me know. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh I had no idea. I hope by making the list I didn't annoy you since some people enjoy performing some tasks themselves. I don't wanna take any work away from you if you enjoy doing it. If you wish for me to take over this process for any reason, I would be glad to use your scripts. Thanks. - Tutmosis  17:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Annoy? Hell no. I have plenty of things to do and the more people able and willing to do any particular task the better. I actually put together a list a while ago of periodic maintenance tasks that various folks do, see Maintenance/tasklist (but haven't added tasks related to featured articles). The scripts are shell/awk, I run them on a Mac OS X. If you're on Mac or Linux it should be very easy, if you use Windows it might be a little harder. The WBFAN script is at List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations/script - as far as I know I'm the only one who has ever run it. I'll put the source for the monthly list scripts on a page somewhere (I'll let you know where) so anyone who might be interested can run them (or improve them). If you're interested, please feel free to use them. I'll keep these on my "to do" list, but if you get to them first that will be absolutely fine with me. -- Rick Block (talk) 18:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks for the response. I'm definetely interested and I'm running Windows. - Tutmosis  18:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I've posted the source for the by-month scripts as well, see Featured articles nominated in 2006/scripts. I suspect the easiest way to use these on Windows would be to download cygwin (which I don't think comes with cURL, so you'd have to find this as well). The main processing is done in awk, which is vaguely a predecessor of perl. I don't think it would be difficult to translate the awk code to perl. -- Rick Block (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Weymouth article
Thankyou Tutmosis for your comments, however I would appreciate help in changing that article-exclusive table into the nice template you mentioned. Thanks for your input =) Rossenglish 10:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Wow, thanks Tutmosis on your nice work on the infobox, and very well thought out constructive comments. You are a great Wikipedian =) Rossenglish 18:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry Tutmosis, I am a fellow Wikipedian in need of help =S I have found an excellent website for Weymouth's demographics, but I really cant sort it into tables and prose to make a good Demographics section, I can't handle those scripts and things! Hence I would really appreciate some help! If you can help, an excellent website I found was http://www.dorsetforyou.com/index.jsp?articleid=343610 . Thanks ever so much, but if you can't help, I should be able to find another person to, so don't worry. Hopeful thanks, Rossenglish 14:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Phew, I made one, thanks for the table you made! There's a sample of a demographics section on my talk page, hope you like! Rossenglish 17:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Horaay we have an up-to-standard politics and demographics section, thanks so much for your help and input ;) Rossenglish 10:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I have noticed that you now support nomination for Weymouth to become FA, however it appears to have been taken off the candidate list, and the 'failed FAC' template added to the talk page, I don't know what to do know! Rossenglish 22:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know, I keep checking for odd mistakes and improving the Weymouth article, but I feel it is time now to renominate it for FAC, I can't see any reason why not ;) Rossenglish 13:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Tee hee thanks Tutmosis for my award, I couldn't have done half the work on Weymouth without your input - I have learnt alot about how things work now. Thankyou so much!!! =) If I get a barnstar for my work on one article, you surely deserve one too for your continuing work on managing and helping out with FACs. Rossenglish 19:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

catmore1 template

 * what's so good about catmore1 anyway? W guice 18:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Concordia Newsletter
NEWSLETTER

Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.

Help out now!
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
 * Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
 * Give people the Civility Barnstar.
 * Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
 * Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
 * Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.

Decision Making
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.

If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.

- Ian ¹³  /t  20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.

36 Chambers
I'm wondering about your decision to switch the word "earliest" to "first" in the sentence about the "Protect Ya Neck"/"After Laughter Comes Tears" single. Obviously, these tracks were recorded EARLIER any other tracks on the album (making them the earliest tracks to make the album) but do we have any evidence that they were the FIRST to be selected for the album (the first tracks to make the album, as the current version states)?

Obviously, 36 Chambers probably contains just about everything Wu-Tang had recorded at that point, and it's likely that they picked these songs for the album because they were picking everything. However, I don't think we can simply assume that when RZA was assembling the tracks for the album he said "First off, I choose 'Protect Ya Neck' and 'Tearz'."

Maybe there's a better (less awkward) way to say "earliest to make the album", but I think "first to make the album" makes a potentially false assumption. Hope that makes sense. Hit me back. Venicemenace 20:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree that it's awkward - that's why I didn't change it back - and I don't KNOW that it's false, but I also don't know that it's true. I'll try to think of another way to put it, and in the meantime leave your version up since it isn't a major issue at all. Thanks for your reply. Venicemenace 20:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Cats for Hip hop albums
Hi-ya Tutmosis, Yeah i was moving some of those as I have seen there was a cat for "East Coast Hip Hop albums" but it was empty. I agree it should be re-named. I think we should create those other cats to as the category for Hip-hop albums is very over-populated. Let's get to it. Andrzejbanas 00:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Request for help
Heya, I could do with your help. I've nommed Latter Days for FA, but, as before, my prose is being slammed. And as before I have no idea what they're talking about, especially as both I and two other people have already coyedited it. However, I assume that SandyGeorgia and Tony1 know what they're talking about, so would you mind taking a look at the article for me? I'll work on any article of your choice for anEditing User talk:Tutmosis (section) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia hour in return... :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I covered all the stuff you mentioned except the rating, which I tried to add to the infobox but it wasn't possible. "wrapped up" is usually the phrase, except for in the context of movie-making, when I believe it is generally dropped off. :) Thankyou for your help - what article would you like improved? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Is there anything you'd particularly like to see on there? Because I'm drawing a blank on Google. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 11:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not that I don't want to work on the cabinet it's just I don't know what to put on it. Is there anything you had in mind, or could suggest for me to do to it? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Hip hop assessment
It would be possible, but, as I'm in the process of setting up another one as we speak, it probably won't be till tomorrow. Badbilltucker 23:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Enter the wu-tang
Hey wutsup? I was wondering who you got to copyedit your k-os article or if you are available to copyedit the Enter the Wu-Tang article. After it is copyedited, I will definitely elect that it deserves featured article status. Noahdabomb3 18:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info- I did already get some help from ONUnicorn at your suggestion, so I'm pleased for now. Noahdabomb3 01:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm renominating the article and it better become featured. Just thought id let ya know. Noahdabomb3 23:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Alien peer review.
Thank you for the review of the Alien film article. It will be most helpful. - Zepheus &lt;ツィフィアス&gt; 00:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the AMA!
Hello Tutmosis, I see that you have decided to join the AMA. I'll be the first to say welcome! We're always in need of more advocates, especially since were backlogged most of the time. Before heading into your first case, please take some time to familiarize yourself with the AMA FAQ's, the Guide to Advocacy, and the AMA Handbook.

Just a few pointers for what we do. We communicate by putting a template on our talk page. The template is AMA alerts. The AMA also has it's own IRC channel, which reports new cases and alerts to us. It can also be used as a place to ask for advice on an issue. If you'd like to jump right into a case, you are free to check out AMA Requests for Assistance, which is our new request for advocacy system. The instructions for how the technical part works is on it's talk page. You can also use the AMA userboxes that appear under here. If you have anymore questions about the organization, just ping any advocate's talk page, including our coordinator Steve Caruso or deputy coordinators Wikiwoohoo and Aeon. Again, welcome to the AMA! -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Quick update.
Just to let you know, I haven't given up on the shadow cabinet, I'm just trying to get on top of other stuff first. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:ADOPT
Hi there,

Looking through our Archives I saw that you took an interest in the Adopt-a-user program during its formation and development. Well this is just a quick message to tell you the program is well and truly lifted off, with over 200 users involved in the program, 50+ active Adopters and approx. 150 Adoptees, and always expanding. If your still interested please pop by WP:ADOPT, have a look around and ask any questions you want on our talk page. Look forward to seeing you there. Cheers Lethaniol 15:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
Ah, no problem; it's not a big deal. :-) Kirill Lokshin 20:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

roger the red AMA case
I have taken up the case you filed with AMA. To get us started can you tell me more about the nature of this dispute? It appears you have added 2 notice templates to American Mutoscope and Biograph Company, can you explain the reasons behind this? In particular what information you believe to be wrong. Your welcome to respond to this at any place you wish, just let me where so we can continue discussion. Thank you. - Tutmosis 01:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Tutmosis, thank you again. It is great to see an unbiased opinion and help with this situation. About the archived material, that was done before I came onboard with Wikipedia and reading it is what intrigued me. On communication with these editors, I honestly have tried viamently to discuss and reason with them. Again, when I even such as suggest that there is ambiguous material in thier inclusions, they take a totalitarian stance and state thier way is "Right" and whatever I change, they will change it thier way. This raises many questions. If there are conflicting items that cannot be completely verified and conflicting references, then ambiguity must be stated. What thier objective is it seems is that any other information other than thiers that is conflicting, is wrong, period. Any kind of discussion with them ends up this way. Also, if you research the "Talk" page, editor in reference to including the "Moon" film subject, "DPSmith" objective is to quote "...I've left it in myself because I think it's so silly that it undercuts any suggestion that the new Biograph is to be taken seriously". This to me sounds like thier is a personal attack and bias here. I could honestly care less who is arguing with whom. All I care about is that a verifiable and clean article is included in Wikipedia, and it is not used as a personal forum. There are also other notes from these editors that suggest the same thing. This is also why I have posted the notices to obtain assistance from other unbiased editors to improve this article. Again, thank you and any thoughts, suggestions, etc. are greatly appreciated. --Roger the red 00:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Glad to hear back. I just want to say continue improving the article and next time an issue comes up between you and the other user(s) I'll be glad to give my opinion. Best regards! —Tutmosis 16:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roger_the_red"


 * Tutmosis, thank you for your reply. I just want to let know know again I have tried and have come up against in incredible opposition to the point of being intimidated. When I do make changes in this article I guarantee that this will happen again. Though I am a newer member, you would know more than me, some of these actions I know would contradict Wikipedian policies and I will need your intervention. Can this be possible on your end?

Thanks, --Roger the red 20:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, first of all I am not an administrator so I can not block anyone if that what you ment. Even if I was and this applies to the current administrators blocking powers are used only on very specific cases such as WP:3RR or WP:VANDAL or WP:AGF. Action to be taken in disagreements over content require various quite long steps outlined in Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. Therefore, looking again at that last page the best thing to do at the moment is for all parties to stop reverting each other and enter discussion. Since you requested an advocate [me :)] I am welcome to represent you in any discussion. If all forms of discussion fail, you (and if you wish me) can move on to various other dispute procedures like WP:3, WP:RFM and WP:RFC. I hope this answers any questions/thoughts you had. —Tutmosis 21:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roger_the_red"


 * Thank you for your reply. I do not mean blocking anyone at all, I mean representing me in my inclusions and securing that there are no problems. Also, I would personally not revert anything unless it was discussed and agreed upon. The other named editors that I have had problems with, would, and have changed and reverted without discussing it first (Please see "Archives"). Again, I have truly tried to enter discussions and they will not listen, period. I am busy as you, and when I find time I will check with you the changes I would like to make in the article prior to actually making those changes and proceed from there. Thank you for your time and do appreciate your input and help.

--Roger the red 21:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Users will often be in conflict "unofficially". There needs to be no formal end to a conflict, no deals need to be made or anything. If the conflict has ended, then it is done, officially or not. Your handling of the case looks to be ok. There is no one right way to handle a case. Although there was one thing I did see on Talk:American Mutoscope and Biograph Company that looked a little odd, under the section Notice to Editors. There is no Wikipedia protocal that says that changes need to be discussed first. The only reason that ever happens is when a page is fully protected from editing due to edit wars. Also, there is no reason to add tags to an article for the heck of adding tags. There needs to be a specific reason to add a tag, and that reason should be expressed on the talk page. There are much better ways to get the attention of editors. And new users are not always drawn in just by a tag. Basically, there needs to be a reason for, and because it's happened before and preemptive aren't very good reasons. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Closing the case is up to you. A good start may be to ask if the advocee needs any more help. One thing I did miss in my statement above was the possible WP:OWN issue with the "discuss changes" part. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you -Royalguard11 very much for your input. First, when I mentioned "Protocol" it was intended as etiquette, not "Policy". Also, if you notice in the "Talk" and "Archives", this article is far from looking decent, and there are many conflicting "Sources", hence the reason for "Tags". If these "Tags" can help, then they need to be there. As you started earlier, it is not "Protocol" to discuss everything on the "Talk" page first, which I agree, this includes tag additions. I am also in contact with our advocate and when enough verifiable information is gathered, the article will be re-edited and changed to a verifiable and proper form. Until these conflicting sources in the article are remedied, then this article will be of a questionable nature and its contents ambiguous at best. On the issue with the "discuss changes" part, that will come after consulting our advocate.

Thanks, --Roger the red 05:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

As you might have read I'm considering closing the case since your no longer are editing the article. Are you okay with that? Even if the case is closed I'm still welcome to represent you in any dispute. —Tutmosis 01:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roger_the_red"


 * Tutmosis, I am still editing the article. Just have been busy. I am waiting for other information to come in, and having to go on several speaking engagements. If you need to close the case for the time being and re-open it a little later, that is fine, as long as the posted notices stay on the page for others to see and contribute.

Thanks, --Roger the red 22:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh okay, I'll leave it open for the time being. No harm in that. —Tutmosis 22:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roger_the_red"


 * PS - I like your "Real life" notice, and using on my talk page now.

--Roger the red 21:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Tutmosis - Roger the red has posted a notice on Talk:American Mutoscope and Biograph Company saying that you're now the contact person for disputes regarding that article. Can you or someone else please indicate what is disputed about the article? There are several editing tags up and it'd be good to get the matter cleared up. -Will Beback · † · 22:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Latest Posting
Tutmosis, I am posting for your review the most recent demand from Will Beback to tell "Him" hat the disputes are, or he will remove all the tags. Only one tag has to do with disputes. Please read the following Talk:American Mutoscope and Biograph Company and User talk:Roger the red. I would like to thank you for your impartiality and your assistance. Reading the "Talk" page postings from both links, there are personal accusations by this editor, which is truly reaching for straws and is not relevant to the improvement of "Content" for the mentioned article. First, I am not a part of an old company, or new company in this article, obviously. I have a couple of friends (Collegues) that are film historians helping me with certain research items on all articles, hence the word "Our" advocate, "Advocate" refering to you. I enjoy editing on Wikipedia without personal accusations and, I feel, harrassment in which I believe this is. It has happened time and again, and I post this User talk:Roger the red as just another example. Thank you. --Roger the red 01:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Tutmosis, can you please say something to Roger about copying material onto multiple talk pages? I don't know what his purpose is, but it makes it hard to have a discussion. Material about editors does not belong on article talk pages, for example. -Will Beback · † · 02:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Tutmosis, thanks for the reply. I'm referring to the posts above, and to Talk:American Mutoscope and Biograph Company, etc. -Will Beback · † · 02:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Tutmosis, the postings on your "Talk" page have been removed with only links now. I only have a few minutes of time so this will be a disjointed reply to what is going on, but it will be as detailed as possible. I quickly reviewed your request and I will reverse the postings on the "Talk" page, however I will include a small link which the reader/editor can go to if they wish. On the other subject of tags, I insist they stay up. I will be happy to point out a "Case" on my return, but feel there is prejudicial circumstanes that have not been addressed. Since you are my "Advocate", you need to please review the postings of Will Beback and question him as well on the intentions of his accusations towards me and his insistance on removing ALL tags. I can somewhat understand to a point the "Factual" dispute tag with a "Case" in which I will compile, but the others "Neutrality", "Verifiablity", and especially "Confusing" (Articles like Mary Pickford and others like it are not confusing and understandable to the reader, this article is not) are valid and to stay. I also understand that all editors are to be treated equally, unless one is an actual Wikipedia "Administrator". I also question why it is such a major point to Will Beback to remove these tags. I respectfully request to you that my inclusions be treated equal as such. I refuse to make Wikipedia a "Battleground" and if this continues I will take this to arbitration and take further action through the proper Wikipedia channels, which I do not wish to do, or to further escalate this situation over "Tags".

Capsulated, the tags are there to notify any contributing editors of the articles problems, and for them to further edit this article. I shall be returning soon in which I will have a simplictic case ready. --Roger the red 04:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

J.P. Calderon
Hi, an article for Survivor: Cook Islands contestant J.P. Calderon is up for afd. Your opinions on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Scorpion 22:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Urgent appeal
I needed your assistance in a very serious problem and appeal to you as my advocate. There is an attempt to block me as a user on Wikipedia by Will Beback who is also an administrator. You can see the accusations on the talk pages. One of the main accusations is that I am somehow connected with the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company which I am not. Of course this will not give me even a chance to be able to write a rebuttal and explanation of the tags I have placed on the article. Unfortunately I am newer to Wikipedia and do not have members here in my defense. I can encourage friends and colleagues of mine who are involved with film history to join Wikipedia, but most likely they will be blocked as well. Whatever assistance you can be please let me know. I will be contacting Wikipedia administration to see what can be done. I do have my case mostly written in defense of my tag postings, but that may never happen because of this possible block. I have made my utmost attempt to follow Wikipedian policies and tried to provide fair editing and editing. But there is a coalition that does not wish to have outside contributions that negate their information. I am very busy and if this matter can be settled that would be nice, but I do have a life and need to focus on that, and on that note I will be absent for awhile longer though will try to log in periodically. If I am blocked, then it will be just an experience and that Wikipedia is something for anyone to truly avoid and definitely not support with contributions of information, membership or financially. This is not a threat by any means, for it is very sad at best. Please let me know as my AMA and thank you. --Roger the red 01:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Tutmosis, my apologies for not first notifying you about Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Roger the red. Your input would be appreciated. -Will Beback · † · 07:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Pottery mediation
Hi Tutmosis, could I ask you to have a quick look at Talk:Pottery? I really think that mediation has broken down and that we are back to square one again, again. Regards, Nick. Nick 17:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Tutmosis. Will you be closing out Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-01-16 Difference of opinion about pottery.? It appears that Nick has deleted the introductory section that I thought we all agreed upon. --Sean Brunnock 17:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [unassessed articles] tagged with. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 22:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Availability to help in a dispute?
Tutmosis, I'm trying to help improve the quality of the facts in a series of pages that involve the history of the Jewish Chasidic movement. I'm not a chasid, just a very knowledgeable historian who has a large number of quality resources and references available to add. However, I'm getting hammered by some fanatical chasids who don't want to listen to facts or reason. They think they own all the facts. Nor are they recognizing the references and facts I'm presenting in what I believe to be a neutral manner. These folks keep undoing my work and basically ganging up on me and my contributions. I'm not saying that I'm always right. But I don't have a particular agenda other than getting the best information into Wiki as possible.

Can you please help me? I'm not asking you to agree with my point of view, but can you please keep an eye on this dispute and maybe help tone these fanatics down? I'm relatively new to Wiki contributions (a lurker for about a year) and would appreciate all the advice you are willing to give.

For a starting point, take a look at this page. This same dispute affects something like 5 or 6 pages of similar material.

Thanks in advance for you kind assistance! --Klezmer 05:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The problem isn't Hasidic fanatics -- the problem is Klezmer who ignores any facts or published works that he doesn't agree with or which don't support his agenda, and won't compromise, so he arbitrarily just keep deleting/reverting and wants the articles to reflect just his own opinion/views despite the comments and input of others who are more knowledgeable than he is about the facts. --ChosidFrumBirth 21:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Tupac RfC
Hey, Tutmosis. The old discussion about 'Pac's birthname is back! I've filed an request for comment hoping to clear this up. The RFC can be found under "Tupac Shakur" on this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:Tupac Shakur, in case you wish to participate. - Mysekurity 06:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Done.
Wow. Finding references for the Shadow Cabinet was difficult. Of course, cos it's all assumed to be common knowledge there's hardly anything I could use. I'm still working on that final Lib Dem cabinet claim, which was also not mentioned anywhere. Grr. Anyway. Hope you're well. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 01:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Featured article review for Austin Nichols
Since you have previously voted for the featured article Austin Nichols, maybe you are interested in the current featured article review. – Ilse@ 23:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Zhou Tong (archer)
A long time ago, you gave me some very helpful suggestions and kind comments about my article in a peer review. It recently passed for FA status. I would like to invite you back to read the page once more. (Ghostexorcist 20:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC))

Re: Barnstar
Thank you for noticing, I really appreciate it. After seeing the horrid quality that this article was earlier this year (like this version for example), I couldn't help but do something about it. So thanks heaps for the barnstar, I think this is the third one I've got for this article :) Spellcast 17:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gang related (film).jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gang related (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shut_em_down_(album).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shut_em_down_(album).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  20:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Backdafucup_part_II.jpg
I have tagged Image:Backdafucup_part_II.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 16:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:JA_The_Followers.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JA_The_Followers.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 22:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)