User talk:Tuwase

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lounge room, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lounge room was changed by Tuwase (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-10-07T05:55:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 05:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Overlinking to common terms does not help articles. Thanks! MKoltnow 02:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I do not see how my edit was considered "unconstructive" or vandalism. Is that a group decision? or is that exclusively your opinion alone? I may be a beginner to editing wikipedia but I do not appreciate such a harsh judgement and acusation. Maybe you feel like an authority because you have been asked to help with vandalism. but I beleive you are taking that task out of context or maybe perhaps misinterpreting my intentions. And that does not mean you just carelessly sling insults. I am neither a vandal nor a de-constructor here. Overlinking to "common terms" I edited the NPR and other articles by adding internal links to either wordy terminology that so called average english speakers may not easilly understand. Why should they have to copy and paste the words into the search field? After all this is the whole point of the so-called "Wiki" part Wikipedia. That in no way shape or form deprived any of the article's of their original contents or meaning. Too many times I read articles that utlilize "scholar" english that "non-scholar" english speakers such as myself who may not utilise on a daily basis need to recall the correct meaning, if a user wishes to self-educate themselve by clicking on the word and immdiately landing on the definition then that should be a good thing. Many of the words I chose may appear "common" to you. But to some they are not so common and that is why I linked them to the articles which contain their definitions. Perhaps I may have mistakenly linked an already linked word, however that shoould not constitute vandalsm. And I will actively reject and oppose being linked to or labled as "unproductive, vandalist or anything of that nature.

--Tuwase Griner 08:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token a8be104a9f6ed81c3ce2ad2a59f4b8b7
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 1d2a59c686c9074e15e5f5a716fcdc77
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!