User talk:Tv316/Archive 01


 * The following discussions are an archive of the conversations I had between October 23, 2005 and April 30, 2006. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on my current talk page.  No further edits should be made to this page.  

 

A Welcome From EinsteinMC2
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your excellent contributions and future influence on Wikipedia. I hope you find pleasure and enjoyment from other Wikipedians. We are glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for you and others to educate yourself more on what being a Wikipedian really means:


 * If you have not already, drop by the New User Log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How To Edit A Page
 * Editing, Policy, Conduct, and Structure Tutorial
 * Picture Tutorial
 * How To Write A Great Article
 * Naming Conventions
 * Manual Of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * If you are ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there is also the Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is What Wikipedia Is Not. If you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to see the Help Pages or add a question to the Village Pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Have a wonderful experience!

Feel free to ask me or other Wikipedians questions any time. If you have any issues that you cannot resolve, contact me at Talk Page.

Greeting From EinsteinMC2

Music Licensing

 * Thanks for the editing on Music Licensing - I tend to type fast and spellcheck slow. Much appreciated! John Henry  My Talk Page 19:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. It's no problem; it takes all of us to make this encyclopedia work. tv316 20:41, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Pro wrestling WikiProject

 * S W D 3 1 6 talk to me 21:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

PS. We both have "316" at the end of our names? Wierd. S W D 3 1 6 talk to me 21:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for inviting me to join the project! I'll definately join up and help with the tasks at hand. The whole 316 thing was pretty big back in the day. Been a while, hasn't it? Well, I needed an email address and my initials formed TV, so I merged it with my love for wrestling. Cheers, my fellow 316er. tv316 04:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Kurt Angle
Hi Tv316. I would like for you to read this link. It states that Angle's last match on RAW will be this monday against Shawn Michaels. I know this is a external, pro wrestling site but it usually posts, about 99% of the time, valid information and I would like for the information about Angle and Daivari to stay until that peice of information above is proven wrong. Thanks. S W D 3 1 6 talk to me 17:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I couldn't find a second source to indicate whether this was true or not, or to find out from where that site got their info from. While I still think that Angle will remain on the RAW roster for the time being, I'll refrain from reverting it back until I either find proof or they clarify the situation tomorrow night on RAW. I don't mean to come off as an ass who likes to edit war. Just trying to make Wikipedia be as factual as possible. Thanks. tv316 17:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I just wish other editors had a good of attitude as you. I stated things like this in the past to other users and they just started edit wars with me. I'm sure on RAW tomorrow night Angle will come clean. :-) Thanks for being so understanding. S W D 3 1 6  talk to me 18:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Editing Question Response
Hmm.. not too sure what your talking about. Are you refering to when you enter the history of a page? S W D 3 1 6 talk to me 19:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Over on the history of the WWE page at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Wrestling_Entertainment&action=history a user named Froggymike8 made an edit on January 14. In his edit description, it goes (---> Aquisition of WCW) and the arrow is a link and the words are the colour gray. I was wondering if you knew how to do that, as it's been puzzling me for the longest time. Thanks. tv316 19:18, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh. I now how to do that. In any edit history, if you see pre-typed information in there, you'll see a  /*  and a  */  symbol on both sides of the words. If you don't erase over the symbols it should grey out the words.


 * TIP: Most editors DO erase of the symbols because the greyed out words usually symbolize that the editor didn't make a edit summary at all. It's important to make edit summaries on Wikipedia


 * Hope I helped! S W D 3 1 6  talk to me 19:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, ok, thanks for your help. It just bugged me how it was like a little secret I wasn't in on. I prefer leaving edit summaries anyways. It tells other people my reasoning behind doing what I do. There are too many people already who just leave blank summaries and their intentions unknown. tv316 20:08, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Professional wrestling event infoboxes
Sure. Any chance you could do the TNA ones for me? Thanks for the help. --Oakster 14:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't follow them much either but their list of succession should help. --Oakster 14:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Not for all of them. Just leave the field blank for them. --Oakster 14:13, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the help. --Oakster 14:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I'm almost done with WWE's events. I haven't started with another promotion yet. So if you want, you can take a promotion and just tell me about it. --Oakster 15:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow. Actually I intended it to be used in only individual articles but actually that doesn't look too bad and could fit in well. Although I do think we should discuss this with the others in the project before we put these in the other articles. --Oakster 15:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Your userboxes
===>I am puzzled I was looking at the Consistent Life Ethic Wikipedians today, and I noticed that you also have the userboxes for sparingly using the death penalty, and pro-choice. I'd be interested in hearing how that jives with the CLE one and furthermore, the pro-life one. I'm not baiting for an quarrel, but feel free to not respond if you think this will end with some kind of bickering or hurt feelings on my part or yours. -Justin (koavf), talk 00:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm against the death penalty in most cases, but there are some exceptions. If you have a guy like Osama and if he's ever caught, I'd be 100% behind his execution. But in the case of someone accused of killing another and he's sentenced to death despite there not be 100% undeniable proof, then I'd be against it. I believe that most executions in the US are wrong, but every now and again a rare exception comes along. I'm pro-choice in the way that I think a woman has a right to have an abortion, but I apply to CLE by not being very fond of most wars, especially unjust ones. I do believe that some wars must be fought by one side, but that the other side didn't need to start it. For example, I believe that the US going to war in World War 2 was justified, but Japan were a bunch of assholes for starting it all.


 * I'm pro-life in the way that I think the US were bigger assholes for dropping the a-bombs on mostly innocent civilians. I oppose pro-life in that I think a mentally sane person has a right to choose to end his own life if a medical disease makes daily life unbearable. I believe it is completely hypocritical to arrest anyone who assists in the death of another person who asks for it, yet someone like Terri Schiavo can be murdered because she lacks the ability to ask for it. I hope that answers the questions you had. If not, feel free to message me again. I'm sorry for ranting like that. For me, it's never as simple as choosing what side I'll be on. I subscribe to various different beliefs on various sides, so I usually end up associating with a lot of viewpoints.


 * There's a few more examples on my userboxes. Ethnically, I'm Jewish, so I put it up there. I still consider myself a Jew even though I don't believe in any of it, so I give myself the atheist box. I also oppose the use of most drugs, but I support the legalization of Cannabis. As long as alcohol is legal, I don't see the harm in Cannabis, although from my boxes you can also see I have no stake in the matter as I am drug free. So confusing. But some things on my boxes are 100% meant as jokes. I don't have multiple personalities. I just thought that would be funny. I also understand English fine. Also, I'm not from Earth :) tv316 01:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

===>Thanks. For the quicky response and charitable tone. -Justin (koavf), talk 01:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem. I'm also pro-nonasshole so I try my best to avoid conflicts and to interact as nicely as possible with others. Cheers. tv316 01:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

re: ongoing vandalism
Sorry, I was distracted before I was able to block him as well. Thanks for the reminder. -- tomf688 {talk} 03:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Elizabeth James
I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article as it doesn't qualify under any of the criteria for speedy deletion. However, I did nominate it for deletion. See Articles for deletion/Elizabeth James.  howch e  ng   {chat} 01:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, sorry about that. I'm still a little unsure of when not to speedy and when to just nominate it. Thanks for correcting it. tv316 01:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Chadbryant
I posted some comments in Talk:WWE Undisputed Championship that I think you should read and may even find enlightening. Sufficed to say, you aren't going to get anywhere with Mr. Bryant as long as you argue with him. When he knows he is wrong, one of his tactics is to continue to argue against you and make stupid and childish remarks until you drop out, then he can claim he has made you "dance" or "tap out," or whatever phrase he's using that week. This is his way of claiming "victory" in his mind; if you quit, that means you have acknowledged his point and claimed him as correct. Of course he will be far from correct, and YOU will know that, *I* will know that, everyone ELSE will know that, but he is a sociopath and as such will see only what he wants to see, when he sees it. He's an aggressor, a manipulative son of a bitch, and will do whatever it takes to "win" his arguement, even at the expense of his own reputation. The feeling from him is that all he has to do is manipulate the facts and truth with lies and exaggerations should it ever come up; thusly, if say four months from now you two get at it again for another article, and you bring up WWE Undisputed Championship, you will get another version of what is going on right now from him. Anyway, this is long enough, and he's really not worth the time it took me to write this. I just thought you should know who you are dealing with, and that I left some remarks which, if I know him, will be deleted and given as "vandalism." But that's why Wikipedia has a "history" option. Take care. --Cainman 01:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Curps/Chadbryant
Curps removed items from your Talk Page because he is the pitcher and Chadbryant is the catcher. Basically, Chad has Curps convinced that every account I create, regardless of the name or date of creation, must be there to attack Chad. Therefore Curps bans the accounts on sight. It should be noted that I am NOT banned by Wikipedia in any way, I am NOT in any way associated with Curps or Chadbryant. The reason that douchebag removed the comments on your talk page is because he automatically reverts ANY comments that my accounts make after he bans the account in question -- regardless whether or not the comments are on topic. He's erased quite a few of my comments and changes to User and Talk pages that contributed in a significant way, and he simply doesn't give a shit about doing so. In my opinion he's one of the worst Wikiadmins on here, due to his "shoot first, ask questions later" behavior.

I would suggest that you forget about getting an explanation out of him -- one of his little quirks is that after he does this, he doesn't bother to explain his actions. You were right to post to his Talk Page and question why he did it; just don't expect an answer anytime this week or month or year or millineum. I think you can see, however, that my comments about Chad were right on the money -- he immediately moved into "manipulate mode" and stated that I had "recruited" you to "help" me in my little "war" against him. This is of course as far from the truth as you can get -- but I believe I explained this to you already that this is precisely how Chad operates. He's a sociopath, a manipulator, and whatever it takes to get what he wants is what he is going to do. In this case, he's got poor Curps on his side, and that's a bad thing, but you see my point. By the way, once Curps gets wind of these remarks, you can probably expect them to vanish as well. Curps, much like Chad, isn't too happy about people posting negative remarks about him and his behavior. -- The User Formerly Known As Cainman AKA I Had To Create This New Account As --Some Pig 02:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Chadbryant at it again
Please take a look at the history on the talk page of WWE Undisputed Championship. You will find that Mr. Bryant is once again removing the comments of others. Could you please contact an admin about this (preferably not Curps, for obvious reasons)? While we are certainly not "best friends" as he has tried to claim in past remarks and edits, I believe you and I still share a common dislike of Mr. Bryant and his childish (and unnecessary) actions, and perhaps between the two of us (well, you and the admin) we can solve this "problem" or put a stop to it completely. I say this in all seriousness, but not under a registered account because, well, you know...that whole "Curps" thing. -- Cainman AKA --166.102.104.90 04:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Just FYI, he's still at it, this time foaming at the mouth. Someone or something said something that I guess pissed him off somehow (vague I know) and now he's on a rampage with sockpuppet accusations, deleting talk page comments, and lies wherever he can put 'em.  He is really starting to become damned annoying on that talk page though.  Is it possible to protect a talk page, or does that negate the entire purpose of having a talk page? --166.102.89.61 23:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 04:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The user Chadbryant is committing vandalism again.
He's deleting entire chunks of evidence re: the WWE name change debate from Talk:WWE Undisputed Championship, apparently classifying any additional information contradicting his insistences as vandalism.

After a long look at his editing history, I honestly think this user is a lifetime vandal and troll with no hope of recovery. Perhaps we should work together to get the banning process rolling, because the pro-wrestling Wikiproject just cannot survive with wild people constantly flaunting their lack of self-control and discipline. 72.36.250.130 23:48, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I think they were Chad, yea.
I read how one of the vandals on your talk page said that "I always win." Chadbryant sent me an AIM back in December telling me this exact statement. It's part of his aggressive sociopathic nature and his narcisstic, egomaniacial, meglaomaniacal, antisocial response in how he perceives the world around him and deals with human interaction ahd behavior (at least on the Internet -- offline, he's pretty much a coward). You also mentioned that the word "cockholster" (if that's even a word?) was used.

Okay, I posted to a forum mentioning in passing how Chad has used the phrase "cockholster" numerous times in the last year or so alone. Therefore there was the possibility that someone who was lurking in or posting to those forums (or even someone from the Usenet newsgroup rec.sport.pro-wrestling) was the one behind that. HOWEVER the phrase "I always win" has generally only been used by the Bloated Bluto on a few specific occassions -- the AOL Instant Messenger IM I received among them. Given this, and your circumstantial evidence showing his not editing as "Chadbryant" within the time frame of the vandals, I do have to agree with your assumption that it was him. One part of his behavior on rec.sport.pro-wrestling (RSPW) has been to create sockpuppets and use them in either a defense of his own person or possibly an attack on those he does not like. Then "Chad" comes along and claims that he has no clue who the person is but at the same time will generally agree with them or make his own remarks as well. So what you basically have here is a type of transference -- he has moved from RSPW to Wikipedia, with more than predictable results.

You have my apologies for this, but at least now after all you have gone through with WWE Undisputed Championship you are able to see what I and many others have been dealing with for years now. It can be quite maddening at times, mostly because he doesn't give a shit about how he comes across so long as he "wins" in the end. --166.102.104.33 02:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

WWE Championship
I contacted WWE Corporate regarding the date of the switch. I posted the email on the articles talk page. The official date as stated in the email and to me by the WWE is May 6th, 2002. This resolves the issue. TruthCrusader

Chad's lost it completely
Check out

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Chadbryant

. . . and tell me what you think. --166.102.104.75 01:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Are you a vandal?
According to Chadbryant you are.

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chadbryant for details; however, in case he removes the comments (as he tends to do) and you cannot find them in his history page (as it can be difficult to do so due to his behavior) here is the full text of what he has written in regards to an admin who blocked him for violation of the 3RR rule:

'''Very simple explanation - two users (both with "316" in their usernames, a markish reference to Stone Cold Steve Austin) have seen fit to mimic the behaviour of the individual referenced at the top of this page to revert or vandalize my contribs with unsubstantiated rumour, or general troublemaking. In the past, I have been able to make clear to any interested admins my intent, as well as the fact that I'm merely being bold when I'm protecting articles from vandalism. Unlike some I have had to deal with here, I am here to contribute, not to engage in disputes with immature trolls. - Chadbryant 23:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC) '''


 * Simply put, although you already know this, Chad Bryant is nothing more than an internet troll. I would have said common, but the trolls I've encountered in the past don't make it their life mission to troll. I've spoken my mind on Chad before and he knows the truth so I need not say any more. He can spout off all the bullshit to everyone and hope someone agrees with his story. He can even write "vindicated" on my talk page. It would just go as evidence to his state of mind and lack of maturity. He can also gather up the names of every user with 316 in their names and make a template stating "These users are believed to be a conspiracy of 316ers who gang up on poor old innocent Chad Bryant and steal his lunch money because Alex Cain told us to."


 * I would have liked to see this troll through to the end, but Wikipedia is a safe zone for trolls like Chad Bryant. Admins sit around and do nothing to stop him while he blatantly trolls around using a variety of childish tactics. Normally, I would try to do something about it, but I've read up on Chad's history as a troll on that newsgroup and, quite frankly, I don't have 10 years of my life to waste arguing with a sociopath on the internet. I'll check in on my watchlist and talk page for the next little while, but I'm not even going to bother reverting his vandalism. As long as there is one Chad Bryant on Wikipedia, this place lacks a good reason to try and fix it up, and, as far as I'm concerned, he can keep it. If Wikipedia is to become even semi-respectable in the mainstream, the first thing that has got to go are the confrontational trolls that would just tarnish Wikipedia's image.


 * What goes around comes around. Karma's a bitch. tv316 05:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

WOW! Very well said tv316!! I thought I was bad, but to be hnest there are a lot of fools that go around parading like they know so much about the wrestling industry, but in reality know nothing such as "Lil crazy thing" Fr3nZi3 17:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC).

Drugs
Your userboxes tell a strange story. You say you're drug-free, then say you favour the legalization of cannabis, then say you're opposed to drugs and any legalization of them. What's up with that? Is one of your personalities a druggies, and the other is totally opposed to them. If so, that's kind of cool, but otherwise...


 * I don't actually have multiple personalities. That's just a joke. As for drugs, I picked those userboxes for lack of anything more descriptive. I am drug free and don't ever want to smoke cannabis, but I am all for it getting legalized. I'm just completely opposed to everything else being legalized. tv316 16:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: User:Chadbryant
Hi, Tv316. Would you mind bringing it up at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents instead? Thanks, Sango  123   (talk)  21:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Capitulation
You might want to be careful about how you capitulate to Chadbryant's demands...and yes, I call them demands because no matter what form they take or how he says it, it's always a demand. Remember, the man has the emotional maturity of a toddler. Anyway, what I'm getting at is that he has been known in the past to use services and proxies and whatever to mask his identity; he is more than aware of and knowledgable on how to use IPs at other locations that he is allegedly "not at" to make it look like someone else is up to no good. PHYSICALLY he may not be at those locations; in cyberspace, however, it's a different story. Just a heads up. --Eat At Joes 03:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * You mean like a proxy server? The only reason I never brought that up was because I'm about 90% ignorant when it comes to proxy servers and traceroutes. It is only my 10% of proxy knowledge that makes me think that you can't see who is behind a high anonymity proxy server by just a traceroute, but I could be wrong. I have 3 internet browsers on my computer. I now use Firefox exclusively, but if I wanted to, I could set up a high anonymity proxy on each of Netscape and IE and I doubt Chad would be able to traceroute it back to me. Then I could potentially vandalize on IE, revert it on Firefox, and then vandalize it again on Netscape.


 * As for giving in to Chad's 'demands', you're going to want to kill me in 2 minutes after I've wasted your time with analogies, but; Say you have a big fire in a part of a building that you don't want to burn down. You fight the fire with water, but that just seems to agitate it more. The fire burns for a while and it burns some of your firemen. Eventually, the fire grows enormous and burns everything worth saving in that part of the building you liked. You get to the point where you say, "Screw this," and you let the fire burn along without trying to put it out. Eventually the fire will get bored and will simmer down a bit. It continues to burn along, but you get thinking, and you realize that the part of the building that the fire is burning is not that important in the long run. But then the fire sees this and lashes out at you and tries to burn the rest of the building down. So you have to go up to the fire and ask the fire why it wants to burn you so bad even though you never did anything harmful to it. You tell the fire that you're sick or pouring water and only getting more fire back in return.


 * Stupid analogy over, here are the bullet points:
 * I'm sick of arguing in predictable circles
 * I don't want my contributions on Wikipedia to be associated with just fighting Chadbryant
 * I still don't agree with Chad's way of doing things, but, like you said, there's no rational reasoning with him
 * Sometimes it's best to settle things first. ANALOGY ALERT: READ AT OWN RISK Say, you're playing Monopoly with your 5 year old brother. Some people like to play it where you win all the property money if you land on Free Parking, so let's say you land on Free Parking and take about $5000 worth of property money. Your kid brother then starts to cry because he can't understand why you took the money. You land on Free Parking a few more times and each time you do, the kid throws a fit. Eventually, you're going to stop trying to take the Free Parking money and you're going to stop the conflict because you have the power to. Your brother doesn't have the ability to say, "Alright, I understand about the Free Parking rule now. Sorry.," but you do. Be the better man. The more you argue, the more you fuel it.
 * That pretty much sums it up. tv316 03:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok
As per your idea, I'll do it. Thanks. TruthCrusader 22:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Laff...well he is already starting with the 'real info' posting. i swear I'm trying to stay away from taking him to arbitration, but I just might have to. TruthCrusader 23:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * This shouldn't be arbitration material. This is plain and simple a violation of WP:HAR. There's also a policy on here somewhere that you shouldn't attack blatant trolls as well. I'm going to go look for that one. tv316 23:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Here it is. WP:BNTV and WP:DNFT tv316 23:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree BUT since no one seems to be doing anything about it, I am going to put it up for arbitration. I just posted the request. Feel free, if you wish, to make any third party statements. TruthCrusader 23:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I think Chad has to first acknowledge it, then they have to accept the 'case'. Then it opens up its own page and then I think 3rd parties can speak up. I may be wrong though, but I don't see a spot for 3rd parties on that page. Whenever it becomes available to me, I'll pipe in with side of it. tv316 23:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Curps is either, on purpose or by accident, totally confusing the whole RFA thing. TruthCrusader 16:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what's going on anymore. He repeatedly tells you to seek arbitration and when you do he makes things confusing. I want to believe he means well, but the issue has nothing to do with Alex Cain. I used the example earlier about water guns, but that's not big enough, I guess. John shoots Sean with a gun. Does Sean now have a license to shoot other people with a gun? No. That's why Chad needs to stop harassing and personally attacking people not named Alex Cain. I think Curps is too involved in it. He's no longer impartial. tv316 16:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I think the problem is Curps was never impartial. He's quick on the trigger to ban and he's not that way to just Cain sockpuppets. Check out his humungous talk page; you'll see that on more than one occassion he's been criticised for his fast bannings and overresponsive behavior. Curps is of the "shoot now, ask questions later" attitude; the problem being dead men tell no tales. This is precisely why User:Chadbryant runs to Curps like a spoiled child who doesn't get his way and so he has to tell the teacher when the other kids don't let him play in their games. Then again Chad is a spoiled child himself; however, the issue is whether or not Curps is impartial, not if Chad is a spoiled child. Therefore let me just digress and sum up by saying that I do not believe Curps has or has ever had the ability to remain impartial due to his knee-jerk reaction involving bannings and user accounts as well as the numerous amount of times he has made decisions in Chadbryant's favor. I believe that Chad has mistakenly come to the conclusion that as a result Curps can be the one to run to whenever the other kids on the playground call him fat; however, this may or may not be the case. I think it's more of a situation where Curps refuses to be open-minded enough to be able to make (liberal?) decisions on whether or not he is capable of handling a situation on his own through his given powers on Wikipedia. --Eat At Joes 04:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey any idea what happened to the RFA? Its gone. Its not in either archive either as rejected or accepted.

TruthCrusader 16:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Now Chad is using a sockpuppet Master Of RSPW to do his dirty work. He only edits articles Chad does, he uses the same flames Chad does, and the name Master of Rspw was one Chad himself used on usenet and had a LiveJournal blog of the same name. He keeps deleting the sockpuppet template though. TruthCrusader 08:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. --Nlu (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. tv316 01:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for dealing with the vandalism by 68.110.9.62. -- Jeff3000 04:46, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The dispute is really unknown to me. He added an uncited statement to the Canada article, and as normal I removed the statement.  A few hours later he starts writing obscenities on my talk page (and putting them back when I took them down) and following me around when I reported him.  I still don't understand why he just didn't bring it up on the talk page instead of directly writing obscenities. -- Jeff3000 04:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

You know you want to rub my face in the dirt, so try it some more! Abuse me, rape me my friend! 68.110.9.62 10:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you're talking about. tv316 14:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Help on Canada page
Hey Tv316, I was wondering if you could help find references for the Canada page. There's a list of sections that needs references on the Talk:Canada page, and people are signing up to find references for each section. Thanks. -- Jeff3000 18:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey Tv316, While you wouldn't have to find the original location of the words and sentences, you would need to find some books, and confirm (either physically, or possibly through some e-Resource) that they kind of state something along the lines as what is stated in the article. For example, when I was doing the sports section, I found some books on Hockey in Canada, a book about Curling, a couple on the Canadian Football league, and found a web reference saying that NASCAR is growing in Canada. -- Jeff3000 22:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your help managing the edits of 67.150.78.223 and his other IP Adresses (67.150.72.191 67.150.74.210 and 67.150.65.40) *He's the guy editing the DoomsDay Device and Flying Clothesline sections aswell as other pages badly*... anyway thanxs again and hopefully he will get the picture soon --- Paulley 10:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page. Canderson7 (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. tv316 13:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Your nom.
If you recall, Naconkantari didn't go through with your nom from a couple weeks back. Just thought I'd let you know, since you wanted to nominate him in the first place, that another RfA is happening now. You may want to check it out. Thanks. -- Jay  (Reply)  23:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for removing vandalism by 81.178.103.67.. I have to say, it's strange to be vandalized with a "stop your vandalism" message. Thank you! CasualFighter 22:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

vandalism
That guy just keeps coming back, so annoying when vandals have access to new IPs -- O bli (Talk) ? 22:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

RFC
Did it right this time. TruthCrusader 21:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes controversy
I am surprised you don't have the "This user supports userboxes" userbox. --  max rspct  leave a message  00:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I just never crossed paths with it before, I guess. It's up there now; taken from your page. Thanks. tv316 01:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

My User page
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my User page. tv316 17:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: AfD Question
I see you closed up the AfD discussion for All-Wrestling_Talk, but you did not delete the article in question. Is there a reason for it still being up? Sorry, but I don't fully know all the deletion policies that there are. Thanks.
 * Hello! Deletion policy can be found at Deletion_Policy.  The reason for the article being left was a simple error on my part, due to having multiple tabs open on WP in Firefox and having an external distraction.  Thanks for bringing it to my attention - I have now deleted the page as part of due process.  Regards,   (aeropagitica)   22:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for quickly reverting the threatening message posted to my talk page by Colonel Graff. Given his history here and on Usenet, I have no choice but to assume that it's a sockpuppet of TruthCrusader. - Chadbryant 22:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * If anyone is an expert on sockpuppets, it's someone who is running one now. --FARVA 07:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Don't be fooled
I would not take anything that Chadbryant tells you about TruthCrusader or DickWitham seriously. Chad, as you may well be aware of by now, has a history of lying and manipulating his way around the facts to make himself appear like the victim when he's really the bad guy all along. Whatever he sent you, you can bet the majority of it -- if not the whole thing -- is a pack of lies. --FARVA 08:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Non-admins closing out AfDs
Should I not have closed down the Beverly Polcyn AfD even though, as the nom, I withdrew it? I only closed it because I didn't want it to float for 7 days until an admin checked today's deletion page, in a week. tv316 11:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * lol, I actually hadn't noticed you had closed it. I was making a general point that it's OK to do in certain, limited circumstances. Your closure seems fine to me, nobody wanted delete and you withdrew it. Closing it just saved us admins some work. --kingboyk 11:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Closing rfa nominations
Thank you for doing that - it was completely my error - my other half was nagging me constantly in my ear about taking the rubbish out at the time, and I wasn't really concentrating. It now looks like it should! -- Francs2000 21:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem, I stole most of them from other people anyway. Incidentally, closing rfa's is normally the reserve of bureaucrats, it's not the same as closing afd's and can lead to you being complained at by other users (even when you're a bureaucrat!). -- Francs2000 [[Image:Gay flag.svg|25px|  ]] 22:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Absolutely agree with you there. -- Francs2000 [[Image:Gay flag.svg|25px| ]] 22:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Nacon kantari  e |t||c|m 23:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

WWE Juniors?
Where did it go? I don't understand. Ad it al 00:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC) They were released Fr3nZi3 17:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Hangman
Congrats on guessing the phrase! Very nice work! -- light darkness (talk) 19:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just discovered Wikigames. It's a nice sidetrack while the vandals sleep. I look forward to more. tv316 19:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Tawkerbot2
It will escalate a test1 to a test4 within a specific amount of time (I don't have the code in front of me, sry), it looks for test1 only at the moment, I'll add bv to the list -- Tawker 20:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Freaksaw
The film is processing though IMDB as we speak, I got the Budit wrong its $2,000,000 (according to yahoo films UK). Becky-RE-fan 21:13, March 18, 2006 (UTC)
 * You can respond to me by either replying to this page or your talk page. When you've made your comments, sign it by adding ~


 * Thank you for pointing out Yahoo Films UK to me, but I'm having trouble finding the article you referred to. Could you please send me the link to it? Thank you. tv316 21:21, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Current WWE roster
I made some changes to the Current World Wrestling Entertainment roster. I thought I would get some feedback from the major contributors to the article.


 * 1) I added a new section for those not contracted to WWE that are performing in dark matches.
 * 2) I removed those performing OVW that are not contracted and placed them in the above mentioned new section.
 * 3) I removed those performing DSW that are not contracted and placed them in the above mentioned new section.
 * 4) I combined all the stables into one major section to view the stables. Reason behind this is because Superstars from OVW/DSW were blended in tag-teams and stables from both the contracted and non-contracted sections.
 * 5) I combined some sections in the OVW and DSW roster; nothing major.
 * 6) I combined the Announcers and Interviewers section with the commentators sections.
 * 7) I moved Chuck Palumbo to DSW based on many websites confirming he moved there. Previous conflicting reports stated he was going to immediatly to the RAW Brand but that was later proven wrong.

You're input on the changes and and any hidden mistakes you find would be appriciated. M o e  ε  17:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Cheating
Well, thanks for being nice to me on Nacon's talk page; and sorry for "beating" you to the punch; but I kinda used cheats. I whipped up a template today; just insert

into a page and that whole thing pops up. Feel free to use it, of course! M   o    P  04:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Cool! I have a stalker! *closes window blinds*

Feel free to use things on my page; most of it is stolen in turn from other users. M   o    P  04:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * That is why my watchlist has millions of things on it; I'm more of a vandal-swatter then real contributor. See my "What I've Been Called" section on my user page if you want to for more ;) M    o    P  04:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: (aeropagitica)
Hello! Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! Looks like someone who is interested in Grindcore didn't like something that I did to an article - deleted it, most likely. You beat me to the reversion by seconds & I'm grateful that you took the time. Shame the vandal did the deed behind an IP address and not signed in - what a coward! Can't be too difficult to block, though. Regards,  (aeropagitica)   16:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Whenever I see a fellow Wikipedian get vandalized, I go right to it. It was up a bit on my watchlist. 1700 pages on it and I'm still going through it :x. tv316 16:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks again for reverting the vandalism on my user and talk pages! Looks like I made an impression on somebody by expressing an opinion or deleting a page. I suppose that I ought to be proud that someone has taken enough time out of their busy vandalism schedule to spare me a couple of minutes!  Your efforts are much appreciated, keep up the good work. Regards,   (aeropagitica)   20:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome and thanks for the compliments. Now with 1800 pages on my watchlist, I expect a raise in my pay to keep reverting the vandalism to your page. Since I asked you that one simple deletion question, I'll always have your pages on my watchlist, so I'll always be there to revert the vandalism done to you. That's basically what I do now. Vandalism and spelling. Glad to help.

By the way, I've been getting extremely slow speeds on here today. Is it going fine for you, or are you also experiencing 3 minute page loads? tv316 20:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * There is significant lag here in the UK for me too. At the moment, pages are taking 60-90 seconds to load up.  It must be slow somewhere in the chain near Florida, at a guess. Regards,   (aeropagitica)   21:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

My user page
Thanks for the revert on my page. They're like mosquitoes tonight. tv316 08:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- Rory 0 96 18:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Anon editor
Think we should block him? &mdash; Deckill e r 00:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I take that back; I think he was just playing around, for he's making some legit edits now. &mdash; Deckill e r 00:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, sounds good. &mdash; Deckill e r 00:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I blocked him for 24 hours. &mdash; Deckill e r 01:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

User Jordans
I wish to apolagize for the actions of vandalisim on wikkipedia that were made on my user. I can assure you that it will not happen again.I would also like to congratulate youre efforts of removing vandalisim on wikkipedia. Keep up the good work.--Jordans 03:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Why are your reverting my work
Hello tv316 this is 71.52.210.253 and I am not a vandal yet for some reason you have reverted the last three edits I have made. The first was adding more information to the PPV One Night Only which I only resently got finished defending at the Montrial Screwjob talk page. the other two were cearecting a bite of HBK triva I added a few weeks ago about his wrestlemania record which I had said was 3-8 but was realy 3-9. Why did you revert these edits.

thank you tv316 for reterning my ONO infermation and editing some of my work. I could have sworn that the Rockers lost to Barbarean and Haku at WM7 but it turnes out I was wrong.

Thanks for the status trick
Hey, I noticed your recommendation on Deckiller's talk page - it's neat. Thanks for showing it to me; I'm using it myself now :). -Xol 23:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Monobook
Hey, I'm confused about one thing: how do I get it so that the template shows the offline/busy/online thing? Do I have to somehow create the template?
 * Eh, now every time I load a page on wikipedia while logged in, it says "stack overflow on line: 19". &mdash; Deckill e r 02:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * All set; I had to clear my browser cache. Eh...I think I'll put this on hold :) &mdash; Deckill e r 02:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey man, thanks for the help anyway; I must just be computer illiterate when it comes to wikipedia coding :) &mdash; Deckill e r 03:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

RfA
 Hetar would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Hetar to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.


 * I'm sorry this nomination failed. I thought you had more than enough experience (and still do) and was honestly suprised by some of the arbitrary qualifications imposed by some users on the process. That said, there were some valid points, such as your contributions to articles. Anyways, keep up the good work and let me know when you are nominated again, as I will be happy to support you. --Hetar 09:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Super vandalism fighter
I wanted to thank you for your guarding of my user page against vandalism a few minutes ago by the anonymous vandal. I see that you may have an RfA in your future. If so, you have my vote. --Danaman5 07:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page as well. VegaDark 08:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to add my thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Chairman S.  Talk  09:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

My user page
You're welcome. Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page numerous times too! - Tangotango 09:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Looks like he/she's been blocked now, thank goodness. - Tangotango 10:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * So true. ;) - Tangotango 10:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

User:218.215.66.120
Dont worry he is a friend just playing around and learning its ok :) Mike Beckham 12:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL, No problem Mike Beckham

83.139.69.26
Something needs to be done with. That user has repeatedly adding spam links over 20 times in the past 24 hours. I have reverted his spam links way too many times already. &mdash;RJN 12:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair use images
Hello Tv316. Images under fair-use are not allowed on user page, but rather on articles related to the image. To figure out what images your allowed on your user page, all you have to do is locate the image and check the tags featured on it (ex. WWE's logo picture has the fair-use tag on it). To which one's you can't use, that would include logos of teams/groups/bands, screenshots, and other images not distributed under the GNU Free Documentation License. M o e  ε  22:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I managed to find it
I have finally managed to find your talk page expect me to be writing on here regularly.Fr3nZi3 03:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Though
I don't know how to send you a message,I will say it HERE. on the match types I could have posted the types of matches from other places,and the link could have been a FANSITE like other pages of SUPERSTARS on here have.So that could have been on topic

Ads
I was mainly talking on NEW match types and a created one,and like all of those superstar fansites I linked my site in the link space,and it's not privite it's open to anyone.My other fansite seemed fine only correction was that I forgot to put down fansite for Ken Doane in the links.

Vandalism reversion
Hi, I appreciate your efforts with reversion of vandalism. However, please take care to ensure that you revert back to the last "good" version, such as in this case- the previous two edits were also vandalism, so the version you reverted to was still a vandalised version. The danger is that people will think "reverted vandalism, that must be a good version", and will use that as the basis for future edits, letting the previous two vandalism edits become embedded. Fourohfour 11:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I usually do check all the diffs from the time since I last checked the article. I must have just messed up something with the times. tv316 11:46, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem! Fourohfour 12:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

ARV
Thanks for your interest in ARV :P

As of right now, ARV has a few dependencies that it relies on, however, your monobook already has them! Add the following after your other includes. inc("User:Lightdarkness/aiv.js");

That should do the trick, make sure you do a hard refresh after adding it. Now, a tab will appear on all user talk pages with a button to "Report". Enter the reason, and it'll be inserted on AIV! I will be adding new features to it in the coming days, along with other report links on contribution pages. If you have any questions or bug reports, let me know, but just remember, it only works with Firefox. -- light darkness (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: My user page
Glad to help. :) Regards,  Sango  123    (e)  23:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Your welcome ^_^ &mdash; Deckill e r 03:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism on my page
Thanks for reverting the vandalism (naked pictures) on my user page.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 15:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Mickie's finisher
Is Mickie's DDT a spinning spike DDT or is it a standing tornado DDT?? Let me know please. 165.196.194.133 20:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship
I'm sorry to have to bear the bad news that your RfA was unsuccessful; I have closed it as no consensus with a final tally of 41/17/11. I encourage you to keep working hard in your areas of interest and to run again when you feel the time is right. If I can be of any help to you, please don't hesitate to ask. Essjay Talk •  Contact 17:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

I told you so!
I told you that Mickie will win the Women's Championship!

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof. I've added you to the list of authorized users, and I will do my best to notify you once a download becomes available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 21:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
This is about user on 59.163.25.48. This is a proxy server common for all students of IIT Bombay. Anonymous users sometimes do indulge in vandalism. This is not an individual server.Cygnus_hansa 18:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

A Download Is Now Available
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

PLEASE ASSIST, WRESTLING FANS OF WIKIPEDIA
Me and the soon to be departing (hopefully not) Moe Epsilon are setting up a project to deal with the music of this great business. It will be WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

This is Moe



 * ''The above discussions are preserved as an archive of my conversations from October 23, 2005 to April 30, 2006. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on my current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.