User talk:Tv88196724

Welcome!
Hello, Tv88196724, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as ISOLATE, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cindy ( talk ) 03:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of ISOLATE


A tag has been placed on ISOLATE, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cindy ( talk ) 03:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of This Is Roller Derby


The article This Is Roller Derby has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability in accordance with criteria for films. Lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy ( talk ) 03:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Centre Place (Film)


The article Centre Place (Film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability in accordance with criteria for films. Lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy ( talk ) 03:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bathing franky


The article Bathing franky has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability in accordance with criteria for films. Lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy ( talk ) 03:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Codgers


The article Codgers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability in accordance with criteria for films. Lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy ( talk ) 03:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Are you associated with Titan View?
I have to ask, but are you associated with Titan View? I'm asking because I noticed that the initials in your username are the same as the initials in Titan View. I also noticed that it looks like most, if not all, of the films you are adding to Wikipedia are films that Titan View is currently selling. Please read our page on editing with a conflict of interest, (WP:COI) as this can be seen as you trying to advertise for your company. I will try to save what film articles I can, but many have serious issues with notability per WP:NFILM and don't seem to pass notability guidelines. I'd also really, REALLY recommend against removing proposed deletion templates without giving at least some reason as to why they pass notability guidelines. Simply removing the template doesn't guarantee that the film can't be nominated for deletion in other ways. I'd also like you to read over our guidelines on reliable sources, as several of the links you've provided don't seem to really be all that reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines. You also have some issues with tone, which furthers my suspicions that you're creating articles for Titan View. They come across as very promotional in tone sometimes. While there isn't exactly a rule against adding pages when you're affiliated with a company, it's highly discouraged and given that most of the articles you're creating have so many issues with them, I'd really recommend that you probably look to getting someone from the film wikiproject (WP:FILM) to help you before creating more articles. It'd also help with any issues that might arise with the conflict of interest. I'll warn you, if it is believed that you are editing on behalf of a company with the intent to promote your films, this can lead to you getting blocked as a spammer. I'll add a more lengthy section about COI editing in just a minute. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Tv88196724. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Centre Place (Film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centre Place (Film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Centre Place (Film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)