User talk:Tvalich

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to The Inquirer, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Also, make sure to use an informative edit summary for such edits. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Dancter 19:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Your Personal Attacks
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Dionyseus 10:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Followed your line of articles. Are you one of the following: a) competing web-sites b) run a blog? c) Employee of a company that might get offended by the articles? d) Just have your personal favorites and dislike non-NDA obeying web-sites?

There is a clear conflict of interest in your behaviour.

Following the timeline of dispute, I have no other choice but to proceed with Wikipedia policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvalich (talk • contribs) 10:23, 14 July 2006

Your Theo Valich article has been nominated for deletion
Hi, your article Theo Valich has been nominated for deletion. Feel free to participate in the discussion: Articles_for_deletion/Theo_Valich. Dionyseus 10:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Expected. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tvalich (talk • contribs).

Dionsyous
Don't be scared by Dionsyous ability to quote non-applicable Wikipedia policy. Once he learns of a Wikipedia policy he uses it at every junction in an effort to intimidate his "opponents" (of course anyone who questions him is immediately his opponent in his mind). His frequent references to Assume good faith (usually its the ones that are acting in bad faith are the ones that quote Assume good faith, because they obviously can't backup the claim that they are acting in good faith they just threaten everyone by quoting "assume good faith" despite piles of evidence they are acting in bad faith) and threatening arbitration committee are perfect examples of this. Don't let him get away with his low tactics anymore. Suoerh2 21:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Please comment at the Dionyseus ArbCom [here]. His bad behavior does indeed deserve review. Danny Pi 12:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Please avoid changing "Trump" to "Drumpf"
Hi Tvalich. In one of your recent edits, you changed the word "Trump" to "Drumpf". I assume that this was unintentional and caused by having the Drumpfinator extension enabled. To avoid this kind of mistake in the future, please disable the extension before editing articles that mention Trump. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 11:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)