User talk:Tvtonightokc/Archives/2018/November

File:Kvii-tv-logo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Noticiero Telemundo 2015.png
Thanks for uploading File:Noticiero Telemundo 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

"cable, satellite, IPTV, MMDS, UHF television providers" unnecessary specifications - go with "pay television" instead
Hi, I noticed a while ago on the recent articles you've contributed, mainly WGN America, TNT (U.S. TV network) and TBS (U.S. TV network), that you relentlessly choose to mention "cable, satellite, IPTV, MMDS, UHF television providers" in order to describe the subscription TV operators carrying these channels instead of just going with the "pay television providers" phrase. Could you please stop doing that? I had to revert you and change your writing due to this problem, as it is very unnecessary to mention every single way a TV operator can distribute its offer in a complicated way, affecting the article's reading. I'll be forced to modify your contribs' writing otherwise. Cheers. --Bankster (talk) 14:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)