User talk:Tvwatchdog

Welcome!
Hello, Tvwatchdog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! swinquest (talk) 13:53, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Good job with Go On (TV series)
Hey there, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your edit summary for Go On (TV series), so I just wanted to stop by and tell you "Good job for a first article"! I made a few minor fixes/changes, but otherwise, it looks great.

You may have noticed that someone tagged it with One source and refimprove (which, honestly, I think was unnecessary). That editor is referring to the fact that almost all of the references come from one source, Deadline.com. It's not really that you need more sources, just a larger variety of sources. I see that you did use TVLine once. I would suggest you go there, and also look at other TV-related websites like The Hollywood Reporter, TV Guide , Entertainment Weekly , Zap2it , etc. to find other sources for the some info you added to the article, and replace some of the Deadline refs. (Just try not to pick any that say in the article they cite another news source, like "Deadline is reporting...". In a case like that, you'd always rather have the original source.)

Hope that helps. If you have any questions, let me know. And again, welcome to Wiki! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey, thankyou! I wasn't really sure what I was doing some of the time with referencing, etc., but I thought it would be better to put too much than not enough. I used Deadline so much because I consider it to be a reputable source (and honestly, it was easy to find chronological sources from the one place...), but I understand why variety is needed. Thanks for the guidance! -- Tvwatchdog (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Personally, I don't agree with the maintenance tags, but every editor has their opinions. I think your article was much better referenced than many others here, and Deadline is def a reliable source. Happy editing! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)