User talk:Twas Now/Archive 6

Proposed deletion of Forget Everything You Know
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Forget Everything You Know, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Forget Everything You Know – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a EP that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of D.b.s.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article D.b.s., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

D.b.s. – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tales from the Crib
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tales from the Crib, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Tales from the Crib – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a album that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of If the Music's Loud Enough…
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article If the Music's Loud Enough…, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

If the Music's Loud Enough… – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a album that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of I Is for Insignificant
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Is for Insignificant, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

I Is for Insignificant – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a album that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Some Boys Got It, Most Men Don't
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Some Boys Got It, Most Men Don't, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Some Boys Got It, Most Men Don't – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a album that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of If Life Were a Result, We'd All Be Dead
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article If Life Were a Result, We'd All Be Dead, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

If Life Were a Result, We'd All Be Dead – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a album that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Recent d.b.s. - related PRODs
Just to let you know, I'm not yet convinced by the arguments you proffered for removing the PRODs on the d.b.s. related articles. Currently my intention is to proceed to AfD. I note that you are doing some significant and positive work on the articles, so I'll certainly hold off while this is being done, and reassess in the light of this before proceeding. If you want to discuss things in the meanwhile, I'm happy to do so. --Rogerb67 (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, i want to know how to work on wiki english, Can you teach me?Thick thi sock (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)