User talk:Tweekerd

Image Tagging Image:Mandalavandalz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mandalavandalz.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion &#9733; talk 09:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Texas2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Texas2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Haltya.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Haltya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:P5180081.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:P5180081.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 02:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

NO I WASN'T ERASING EVERYTHING FROM THE PAGE THAT YOU WORTE!!! SOMEONE WAS ERASING MY STUFF AS WELL!! HOW DARE YOU EVEN SUGGETS I DID THAT!! Little Spike

Oh LOL its okay. Yeah I didn't like how may comment was earsed either. These wikipedia people are Internet Nazis! lol Little Spike

Hend-held counter
The real shame is that we can't can't count crocodile tears in the infobox. I'm sure you went and whined to everyone else who didn't bother to put in anything on the page at all about displaced Isralis. btw you forgot to sign your diatribe.--Paraphelion 12:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That was sarcasm, I know you didn't go whine to anyone else because you are the type of person who rather than trying to argue with those who removed the displaced count in the first place, you go and whine to the person who bothered to put something up and bothered to look it up and who by the way has cited Israeli sources in the article before. First of all I don't care where you live and if you told me I wouldn't believe you anyway.  Secondly it could equally be reasoned that people who live close or in the conflict are too biased to see both sides.  Thirdly I'll not share any personal details of myself with you as I know it will never be enough; you are the type of person who so long as there is a difference of opinion will seek to find a tangental reason based on circumstance why their opinion is wrong.--Paraphelion 13:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok. Getting back to the first issue - so we can at least start somewhere - the count of the displaced.  The only source I found for the 10,000 number was from that DEBKA site.  And I really don't know much about that site, it was the first time I came across it when searching for something.  I had seen it before in relation to some discussions on this article before and that people were debating about that website, but I didn't pay a lot of attention.  Then when I found this article, I looked and saw that none of the other citations were from there anymore, so I figured there's a reason for that.  But there must be other more mainstream sources in Israel with numbers about the displaced?   I don't read Hebrew, but others have used sources written in Hebrew before, so perhaps you can find one.  Also I looked at that ynet site which seems to be a pretty good site for Israeli news (I've used it before), but I didn't find a number - maybe you'll have better luck.  I try not to be biased, but I won't claim that I am not.  I have found things in the article pro/con for both sides that I have argued for/against, and I have noticed most editors only make edits for one side.  There is a discussion going on about presenting the civilian targets section better.  What other parts of the entry do you have issues with?--Paraphelion 14:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Two Israeli agressions
Yes, I figured out AFTER uploading the image and I CLEARLY said that if someone had an image of a Hezbollah agression, that he or she could upload it and then me, and that I would replace the left image with it. Therefore, if you have a picture that would suit the left part, I would be pleased to put it instead of the tank. Sorry for this. --Deenoe 17:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I would also like to say that I have no POV on this issue. I just took the picture that there was one before (therefore the Tank) and the picture of a Beirut neighbourhood. It didn't go through my mind when I was making the composite but after it did. --Deenoe 17:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * They seem to WANT a picture... Why don't we just put the freaking map and get over with it. :p --Deenoe 17:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Israel invasion planning.
Okay, you could be right about it not belonging in the timeline: that the timeline should just deal with actual actions in the conflict sounds fine to me. But perhaps that standard should be upheld and quotes from Israeli and Hezbollah press releases should be removed to make way for just the descriptions of military/terrorist operations.

I meant with the "time will tell" only to say that the description given by the article for the plans may not line up with how the invasion actually goes: I guess the reader can infer that anyway, I'll remove that when I this bit in another place of the article. That place being the Historical Background section; does that sound alright with you? --216.211.49.187 19:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Revert war 2006 Arab/Isreal Conflict
Please stop reverting this article. You have violated the 3RR rule and are helping protract an edit war. I have asked for this page to be protected because of that. Davidpdx 13:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

You are part of the problem by continuing to revert the page. By doing that you are contribuing nothing but causing a fight. As I said you are violating several Wikipedia rules. Please sit down and read the rules for yourself, don't take my word for it. Davidpdx 22:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

You are in violation
In response to the comment you made on my dicussion page, I direct you to the following Wikipedia rule No personal attacks. ArmanJan 10:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Even after my warning that you are violating a wiki rule you persist on (again) attacking me personally. ArmanJan 11:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Puoskari


The article Puoskari has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''Unotble music artist with little info.

Finish wiki has even less info.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luomuhappo


The article Luomuhappo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, a google search shows little results"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)