User talk:Twerking4nate

Nate Garner
Nate from his car Twerking4nate (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nate Garner (social media star)
Hello, Twerking4nate. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nate Garner (social media star), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nate Garner (social media star) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Mduvekot (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, Twerking4nate. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD (talk) 18:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * To elaborate: any and all unsourced or non-neutral content (especially about living persons) will be deleted from Wikipedia. Please don't add content unless it's supported by WP:RELIABLE sources. We also don't keep fancruft and trivia. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD (talk) 18:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi; if you continue treating a Wikipedia article as a personal fanzine, I'll ask for administrative assistance. Thank you, 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD (talk) 18:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:1:AEA0:E043:273F:60CC:B6DD (talk) 18:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathaniel Kirk Garner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathaniel Kirk Garner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Kirk Garner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 19:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)