User talk:TwilightMidna

Recent edit to Whopperito
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Recent Contributions of Late
Hi, and thank you for the recent edits you did. Unfortunately, a considerable number of recent additions you made to articles were reverted due to problems surrounding what was added in. The main problem was that these edits were not constructive and generally added in information that appeared to be not neutral in tone, and/or original research without citations to support them. Please be careful in future with your editing, and do note that any edits you wish to make in future can be tested out in your sandbox before you commit them to their respective article. GUtt01 (talk) 21:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gods and Monsters (2020 video game)


Hello, TwilightMidna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gods and Monsters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
You need to stop making unsourced or insufficiently sourced generalities in reception sections or intros to articles. When people write things like this properly, it’s because it’s summarizing content already properly sourced in the article. You have repeatedly attempted to make sweeping generalizations about games reception with 0 or 1 reviews in an article. You cannot do that. You can’t make large generalizations based on a single review. You need to be summarizing already sourced content, or provide your own sources for the sentiment. Sergecross73  msg me  03:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 21:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I am terribly sorry, I totally forgot to add a source. I'm new to the source addition and I don't exactly know how it works; I am not in my best day and I might just clicked on Save Changes out of my mind. I'll try to do not repeat this mistake. TwilightMidna (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Don't add your personal commentary to articles like this. Whether or not the reviewers were "aware of the less powerful hardware", it's not the place to complain that a game got criticism. ---ThomasO1989 (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)