User talk:TwilligToves/Archives/2007/March

Barnstar
Thank you very much, not only for your appreciation of my translations, but for the expansions you made to the articles and for recommending them to DYK. I look forward to working further with you in the future and definitely hope to see more of your thriving contributions. Best, Defrosted 09:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Trembling before G-d
Heya, I believe someone has worked on your suggestions at the Trembling FAC. Would you mind reviewing your comments? Even if they haven't been followed up on, I'd like to know so I can do it myself. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * All done, want to take a look? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Character count - DYK
Hi there. I note your comments when Jreferee indicates a character count over 1500 on a DYK nomination. I think you'll find that he is only letting other editors know the count and not suggesting that the nom is short. Cheers. -- VS talk 01:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Jāzeps Vītols on DYK for 11 March 2007
Thank you for the nomination! &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

William Clowes Ltd. and Woodstock of physics on DYK for 11 March 2007
Thank you for your contributions! &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Heinz Tiessen on DYK for 11 March 2007
Thank you for the nomination. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 21:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:DYK arranging
Oops. I thought that referred to the order of the sections rather than the DYKs themselves, but now I see that there isn't really much order in the earlier dates either… Thanks for telling me though, otherwise I would probably have wasted a lot more time rearranging them. --Grimhelm 07:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Vandalism studies/Obama article study
Thanks for this. Hoping you will consider extending the study to include the Barack Obama article's current experiment with unprotection which (at least so far) looks encouraging. Here's something I did that might yield a few more ideas. My snap hypothesis after reviewing this sample: We are dealing mainly with badly behaved children at play (editing in the early evening, after school, mostly from small town, USA)... play is how children learn best, and encyclopedias are for learning. So what do we teach? In this line of thinking I think maximum openness is a smart investment in the future. --HailFire 18:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

LoCE copyedit progress template
Are you still involved with the LoCE? I haven't seen you around there in a while. I wanted to make an update to the to the progress template (I wanted to append the graph to display copyedited but not proofread counts too), but I didn't want to do anything without talking to you first as it was your creation. Also, there has been a bit of talk about me creating a bot to automatically update the template, but again, I wanted to get your input before proceeding. What do you think? &mdash;Daniel Vandersluis(talk) 14:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)