User talk:TwilligToves/Archives/2008/March

DotA FAC
Thanks for your comments; I think I have addressed your issues, so could you take another look? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 20:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review idea
Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 00:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Elderly Instruments
I believe I have addressed your concern at Featured article candidates/Elderly Instruments. Would you mind revisiting your comment and striking it if you are satisfied? Thanks! --Laser brain (talk) 03:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate comments on CG article
I hope you don't mind that I have also posted them on the article talk page. Did you intend to correct these yourself, or were you suggesting them for others to fix ? Thanks. ;o) Red thoreau  (talk TR 19:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I just realized that your comments were in reference to the article after it was reverted back to 160 K from 78 K. If you have time, do you think you could edit your suggestions in reference to the existing article now, as to prevent confusion of editors attempting to fix things that have already been fixed. Thanks either way. ;o) Red thoreau  (talk TR 22:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)