User talk:Twinkle1990/Archive 13

Draft: Rhea Solanki
Hi @Twinkle1990 you recently rejected a draft for Rhea Solanki Could you please specify which interview references you would like removed? All of the references added are independent of Rhea. And there are also secondary sources added to back the primary articles. Would appreciate your feedback on how the sources can be improved. Thanks. Wikiedree (talk) 06:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @Wikiedree I have now stopped reviewing UPE/COI/PAID articles. You can resubmit. Some other reviewer will look through. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Kiren Sandhu
Not seeing any defamation, but certainly spam. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for deleting. I placed G11 tag. The user has been notified about G11. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh and Oops, you are an Administrator, having better knowledge than me. I didn't know you. Sorry. I should ask for suggestions regarding such incident if you don't mind to reply to my request. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If a draft is full of praise for the subject,
 * with nary a contrary word,
 * calling the content "defamatory"
 * (even if unsourced)
 * is really quite inaccurate. --Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I am confused. I have my opinion that I did correctly decline the draft and sent for G11.
 * Yes, "draft is full of praise for the subject" though not defamatory as written like autobiography. For extra note, the draft had no references. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but your edit summary said something about defamatory -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I used AFCH for the rejection. And used TRwinkle for CSD. Twinkle1990 (talk) 01:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I will be careful using AFCH and Twinkle. Sorry for the problematic decline tag. Twinkle1990 (talk) 01:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Request on 23:45:23, 12 March 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Ldisconzi
Good afternoon @Twinkle1990,

Thank you for taking your time to review my submittal. You have recently rejected my entry regarding Mr. Alexandre Lopes. On your review you have mentioned that several claims are unsourced, and that WordPress posts should not be referenced. I went over all the links that I used to support this article and removed reference 18 which was indeed a WordPress post. I have also removed one of the claims that I could not find a source to. I would like to hear more feedback from you on what else I could improve and if there are any other claims that I should find more sources to. Thank you.

Ldisconzi (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I am no longer AFC reviewer. Some other reviewer will review your submission. Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)