User talk:Twinwd

Welcome!
Hello, Twinwd, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Richard Behar, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Coretheapple (talk) 14:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Richard Behar
I notice that you removed sourced text in the article in this edit and that your edit summary made no mention of that removal. This is problematic on three grounds: first, removal of sourced text without proper cause, second, an inaccurate edit summary, and third, a substantive edit was incorrectly marked as "minor." I notice that your edits are confined to Richard Behar, indicative of a conflict of interest. I suggest that you review the links and suggestions posted above, and that if indeed you are related in some way to the subject of the article that you are "strongly advised" not to edit the article directly, but to confine your contributions to the article discussion page. Coretheapple (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)