User talk:Twistedpiper

Carl Katter
Hi, just saw you reverted two of my edits on Carl Katter as "undoing vandalism" – in my opinion a very dishonest edit summary. I have reinstated my edits and invite you to start a discussion on Talk:Carl Katter if you have any issues. Cheers – Hshook (talk) 10:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I appreciate that people may have their views. I must question why your view is that this one aspiring politician must not be allowed a Wikipedia article that focuses on a broad range of his career, life, activism, and political life.  I have addressed your questions, and in the meantime, I shall continue to remove any vandalism of the article, vandalism which - on the face of it - looks like it is part of a political agenda. Twistedpiper (talk) 11:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm The Pancake of Heaven!. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Carl Katter, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Youtube is not a reliable source. Any information on Wikipedia without a reliable source will be deleted.'' →The Pancake of Heaven! (T  &bull;&#32; C  &bull;&#32; E) 09:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Carl Katter
Would you please explain why you reverted my edit? According to WP:REF, Youtube isn't such a reliable source. Thanks. →The Pancake of Heaven! (T &bull;&#32; C) 05:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to remove it again. The person in the video is the subject of the article, speaking for himself.  If you wish to remove that, I suggest you systematically go through removing every YouTube reference from every page that you encounter.  It's only fair.  I can help you.  We can do it together and maybe get some sort of Wiki Badge for keeping Wikipedia YouTube free. Twistedpiper (talk) 09:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Slough, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  02:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The article itself contains the information that I am elucidating.Twistedpiper (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism
I'm sure you find this very amusing (or whatever), but shitting on Wikipedia really is a waste of your time. Go kick a tree or something similarly useful. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * you’re quite right. I’ll accept my place. I had thought that I was reflecting history accurately, but all the while I was shitting on Wikipedia.
 * I fought my battles for my country with guns in war and then later for my community upon my return on the streets while the police waited with batons. You fight yours with constructed language and obfuscation.
 * Enjoy your world.Twistedpiper (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no shame in using discussion instead of force. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding me? This is what you people call "gas lighting". You have deliberately vandalised an article about a historical Australian figure for no other purpose than to force a social justice agenda. You then have the gall to place yourself in some position of moral authority. I have given up undoing your damage, but others will eventually pick up the reins. I guarantee you that, if the history of Eugenia Falleni were on the radar of wider society, I could sit back and let others restore truth right now and in doing so help to restore some dignity to Wikipedia.Twistedpiper (talk) 04:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * And you are just as 'guilty' of the force you speak of. Remember: the article was rather pristine until you started rewriting it in Social Justice language.Twistedpiper (talk) 04:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Sigrún Björk Jakobsdóttir moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sigrún Björk Jakobsdóttir, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 05:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your comment
Hi Twistedpiper. Your comment here was inappropriate and will lead to a block if it recurs. Please see WP:CIV, WP:NPA. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 08:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, based on a review of your edit history, I am blocking you indefinitely for disruptive editing, a history of edit-warring, uncivil and/or condescending actions (calculated in a way to seem borderline, e.g. "Pinky"), baseless accusations against others (e.g. "vandalism"), and tendentious editing. Please see WP:GAB and/or WP:AAB for information on how to appeal, and let me know if you have any questions. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 08:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sigrún Björk Jakobsdóttir


Hello, Twistedpiper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sigrún Björk Jakobsdóttir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kevin Coughlin (actor)


Hello, Twistedpiper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kevin Coughlin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)