User talk:Two-Fisted Tales

Welcome!

 * }

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tunney Hunsaker has been reverted. Your edit here to Tunney Hunsaker was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/8902667@N02/4631902466/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Archie Moore was changed by Two-Fisted Tales (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853821 on 2012-10-09T01:46:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

December 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hot Stop talk-contribs 09:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes...interesting, idn' i', how YOU reverting ME x-# of times, is perfectly legit, but ME reverting YOU, is a violation, with specified punishment. Yes, that's the Brave New World spirit, idn' i'? A complete and total study in contradiction. Crash course, for all of you with Zero Life: Once a pecking order has been introduced, you have poisoned your wiki-tickle-toe concept and violated your principles. If Media sources and Media references Can Be Shared, then what DIFFERENCE does it make, who the person quoted or referenced, 'is?' God's sake! Because I've read this person's work and felt it helpful in sharing it? And, if I had shared poetic references from Maya Angelou? You see? The argument as presented from your perspectives, is completely hierarchical. You "outrank" Me, therefore. And, somehow, this is free, progressive, open, loving, Utopian, liberal, good, sweet, light, wonderful, New Age and End of Day and better world and Luveluvluv. NOT. Look...I shared some references from a writer I admire. If the independent press means zero to you, I can dig it, but don't hang it on me as selfpromotion, because I've never even met this poet! I don't really even know their gender, though I might guess. I just have been moved by the person's writing, and given cause to think. It didn't matter, to me, whether the press was indie or the person unknown. You're all hiding behind usernames--why do YOU get your names all over opinionpedia? Or, as I have a username, too, what is this "rank" of Yours, based upon? The ability to access certain buttons to silence certain opinions? Lemme tellya sumthin'... (Redacted). If you can't begin, NOW, along with me, to connect the dots, then, you're very much akin to my local Town Council--elitists playing an "Earth" game--but, as Carlin would say, "it's nothing to do with the planet...that's a misdirection." My Options? I could keep playing the "there's mine!", game, but you've stacked the deck. You're elitists. No one else gets to play your reindeer games. I could use reasoning and argumentation, as I am, now, but I'm dealing with Judge Roy Bean, i.e. I was guilty before I ever stepped foot in the courtroom. I could play the role of Death Commando, because Nothing would happen to me, as in daily reality, there's no such thing as International Law, we all know that, plus anyone and everyone, thanks the Web, can play the role of coward and laugh up their sleeve, so, what's the point? Anyway, until I can, utilizing the Web, follow the thread back to where it leads me to one of a handful I'd suspect are behind this, bravado, ill-advised or otherwise, serves no purpose...but, I'll tell you this: I'm going to go away, for awhile, again; it's clearly what you want. I can only imagine the thousands who get slapped down on a daily basis, so, I understand very well, this about You, not Me...in every way, do grasp that, would you? No, I'll make nice and let you have your "I never heard of the person because Oprah, Bill Clinton or my Lit. Professor never forced them on me"-take on Life, the Universe and Opinionpedia...'K? I'll leave. And, I'll test your reactive sense of need to exercise power (I don't even want to try and visualize your impotence in your walk through every day life), by saying only This: One Day...Some Day...I'm going to log in, again.  Or, try to. If I can't, you've proved my point. If I can, any message I've received, will be deleted, Unread. We have nothing to talk about. You folks are an encapsulated model, of the difference between Left and Right: You HATE, too...you just use other words, and employ other methods. And that puts the angry fascists one-up, on you. I made the edits I made. You didn't like them. I don't Care, what You like. And, vice versa--right? Standoff. Stasis. There's no advantage. You're playing an Eagle Claws game, in a "cool kids" club. Perhaps nothing less, but definitely nothing more. It's a high school yearbook. Does that really make you feel strong? Two-Fisted Tales (talk) 07:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Two-Fisted Tales, I don't know who posted the edit war notice above, but I will note that you reverted my edits that removed publicity-seeking, irrelevant information you inserted about your poems into three articles. I stand no higher than you in the Wikipedia hierarchy. It's common courtesy, never mind Wikipedia practice, to discuss edits on the relevant talk pages before jumping into an edit war. So I welcome you to join me on the Abraham Lincoln talk page for a civil discussion of why you feel the poetry reference is relevant there and on the two other articles. --Pergish1 (talk) 22:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

John Henry Stelle ISBNs
When fixing the ISBNs on John Henry Stelle, I noticed that you had tried to fix them earlier, so I figured you'd appreciate seeing how I ended up solving the problem. The references were broken because the ISBN didn't include the "0" area prefix, so I added that, and I merged some identical references by turning the first instance into a named reference. {&#123; Nihiltres &#124;talk&#124;edits}&#125; 17:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bradley Braves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Stone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes. Thank You. This was unintended, and I might add, profits nothing for my edit--my own, William "Billy" Stone, though he came to Bradley University coaching after several seasons in the postwar NFL, seems to not have a page devoted to him. Any editor or cleanup 'bot, is more than welcome to unlink from Disambiguation; I attempted to utilize the provided link(s) in the Above message, but was told the database is down. As indicated by my erratic editing history, my free time is severely limited.Two-Fisted Tales (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Grouseland page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=644182785 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F644182785%7CGrouseland%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bradley Braves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2017
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears you can't stop yourself from ongoing personal attacks even when blocked. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bishonen &#124; talk 11:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)