User talk:Two reasons

Welcome
 Hello, Two reasons, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Two reasons, good luck, and have fun. aboideautalk 13:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Please consider your edits more carefully
This edit drew my attention, as China is on my watchlist. You may not know how contentious many articles on Wikipedia are, such as China. When you change the text to "... governed by its vanguard Communist Party ..." what does 'vanguard' contribute to "Clearer / specificity"? I finally found a mention over in Communist Party of China where something was said about theory. As it is, inserting 'vanguard' out of the blue sounds like propaganda, or perhaps a WP:Peacock term. A small thing perhaps, but much rage here has been engendered by as little.

Peeking around, I then see this edit, where you take out orienting information from article Trier with edit summary "Too much information". Believe it or not, this was a big deal not too many months ago when people from the PRC 'donated' a giant statue (bust?) to Trier to commemorate him, and lots of people in Trier were _not_ happy about it.

In this edit you change "opponent of same-sex marriage and homosexuality," to "opponent of LGBT rights". Did you read the associated refs to see what they said? That is, what _he_ has said? If he has been quoted / referenced as specifically against the two, but not quoted as mentioning the more general LGBT rights, aren't your changes making unproved claims? We must be very careful how we say things about people. (WP:BLP)

As for precision, your two edits to Canada and Mexico have been reverted. I'm not sure "the southern half of North America" and "the northern half of North America" make any sense to me. How are you dividing NA into halves? Latitude? Area? Population? Heck, Canada may *be* the northern half by area. The changes seem arbitrarily precise, while given a moment's thought then seem impractically definable. I was intrigued by one of the revert comments, and checked the archives. Shenme (talk) 05:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)