User talk:Twoods246/sandbox

Twoods246 peer review
You need to check your grammar, such as verb tenses and words that could be missing. Your sources seem good and unbiased as well as your tone. The most important thing would be to check your grammar for legibility purposes. Jrob193 (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Isabella's Peer Review
The article is a good example of unbiased information, relying on facts from credible sources. There were multiple grammar mistakes (I was able to correct a few, but others were unclear of what was trying to be said). So far, the article looks good but could use some statistical data regarding the correlation between cyber bullying and suicides. Iperri2 (talk) 03:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Helen`s Peer Review
The article had a good amount of quality information. There were a number of grammatical mistakes that need to be corrected. I would double check to make sure your sources are cited correctly. I suggest using the "Cite" option that appears at the top of the text book when editing your article contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:E40:8A00:E563:C1C6:ED6D:9EF8 (talk) 00:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

summary
thanks for all the feedback, it was really helpful.

As a group, I think we're first going to combine everybody ideas to make one paragraph to add to the new section. then we're going to edit it since that what was most of the peer reviews were about so its readable. There were a great deal of grammatical errors in the draft. Finally, we're going to make sure we use the cite option, to make sure we properly cite the information right.

Twoods246 (talk) 04:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)