User talk:Twsx/Archive 4

Talk page is clean again :-)
Woop-di-doo. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

zahir rana MLM
zahir rana(zedaar)from Ahmadabad in 2001 started a multi level marketing in Ahmadabad Gujarat and by his some project he had rocked the entire state. his offices were across India and his mind is most talented in multi level marketing. other business also he started afterwards still he is on an multi level marketing project which is amazing and if any advice is needed for multi level marketing i would request every one to take from him and to always follow the master mind zedaar he says "always to do a work which no one is able to do."by which you will be different and to you people will give respect. now he is on project of second earning which is an multi level marketing project and by which all people can "convert their expense into income" and can earn money by spending which is an interesting project — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingzaid007 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

why were my changes undone
First of all http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karuneegar had a detailed description, and now you have removed it. I added content to it and cited websites supporting that. Why was it removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.240.197.233 (talk) 11:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello. I think you may have thr wrong guy – I have not made any edit to this article. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 11:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

it was a mistake I was just looking threw the history

My user page
Hello and well met. Thanks for the tip on the unclosed bold tag on my User page. I just recently created it, and it seems the more I try to "fix" it, the more I mess it up! I removed it, and now it's good for another laugh! Rhinestone K (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

So fast
You fight vandalism so incredibly fast that you sometimes forget to look at the surrounding Booga Booga ;-) - DVdm (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

FIFPro
As recently I browsed the tweets on hashtag #TOTY, and I found out a picture of a leaked Ballon D'Or pre-ceremony. Should I post leaked contents onto the article? --180.183.242.110 (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello. I had to do some Google-ing before I actually knew what you were talking about. The answer is no, this is not what Wikipedia is for. You can flick through the policy article section, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, if you want. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry my friend
My idiot friends have edited many pages across wiki with my IP address. I do apoligize

Sorry my friend
My idiot friends have edited many pages across wiki with my IP address. I do apoligize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.248.242.150 (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello Friend
Hi, I need to know why delete what I edited for release in El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador and Paraguay (which opens today). Can I have Might responding. Let me help you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.34.108.172 (talk • contribs)


 * Hello . Removing whole sections from articles without any form of explanation is generally not a good idea. I recommend you read the essay found at WP:RMV. Now, if you feel it makes sense to remove an entire section, I recommend you initiate a conversation on the article's talk page. If you feel you can sufficiently explain it in just one sentence, you can also put it in the edit summary, however, this may still trigger some alarms. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Legit facts should stand
So how do You mean its less constructive, to have a fact about the person being sentenced in court for a narcotics crime, than it is to tell what products he has made advertisments for?

It is a fact with well renowned references, that You can check Yourself. http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/courts/swedish-model-tv-personality-jailed-for-life-in-dubai-for-for-possessing-21-grams-of-cocaine-1.1277910 http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article18183753.ab http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Farzan+Athari/People+Choice+Awards+2010+Red+Carpet/HPkr3zTLIuk

If You have issues with that? its not to stand in the way for facts. Further there is a court decision and according to Wiki´s rules then it is legit to publish it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.227.59.31 (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, I've reverted your edit because it was not written in English. If you have sensible/sourced facts to add to the article, please do so, in English. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Fernando Francés
Hello Twsx. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fernando Francés, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''there is enough here to pass the low bar of WP:CSD. Let's see if someone will translate it.''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 16:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Message from Jonathan Trevor
Hi I had recently posted a review of the film on my personal blog as well as a trailer, I'm new so maybe you tell me if it was wrong but i honestly think it is a good resource and a reader would get some more value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Trevor (talk • contribs) 13:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Your additions to the articles were removed because personal blogs, such as yours, violate Wikipedia's external links policy. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

KQBT
I removed the redirect of KQBT from the KQTM page because those (KQBT) call letters have replaced KKRW Houston as of January 15, 2014. I was trying to apply them to the proper page and make note of it on the current KKRW page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djrage (talk • contribs) 15:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . At this point in time, the article at KQTM seems to still be in placed. If the subject of that page was renamed, the article should be moved and any redirects to it fixed then. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * KQBT in Albuquerque, New Mexico, has been KQTM since 2008. All information on the now KQTM page do reflect this. I was trying to apply the change of calls and proper redirect of KQBT to the now former KKRW page. I have applied all of the proper changes to that page John Fernandez (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Watching for tampering at Nawab Faizunnessa Govt Girls' High School
Greetings, thanks for helping out at Nawab Faizunnessa Govt Girls' High School, but there's an earlier version that is properly sourced that I made yesterday or so, so I've reverted it to that. Some accounts/IPs which claim an affiliation with the school keep reverting it back to their preferred promotional and poorly-formatted version, so if this persists we may end up locking the article until they go away. They're becoming increasingly hostile too. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!
Sirakshat (talk) 08:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)== I think you have reverted my changes in error. ==

Untitled
Hello Flo,

Akshat Here.

I think you have reverted my changes on the page "Once Upon A Time In Mumbai Dobaraa!" erroneously. As far as the correct spelling of the title is concerned, I took help of a number of links provided at the bottom of the page, which prove my point. Further, you may want to check IMDB regarding the correct spelling of the movie title.

Please check and reply with your thoughts..

Thanks.Sirakshat (talk) 08:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . Seems like it indeed. Huggle marked your edits as vandalism for some reason. I should have checked a little closer. Everyday's a school day. :) I've reverted my edit, sorry for the interference. Happy editing! ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sirakshat (talk) 08:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)== It's completely fine. Afterall, we are all trying to make data presentation better and accurate. ==

@twsx - It's completely fine, my friend. Thanks for your efforts and have a good day. By the by, in case you want to keep in touch, you may like to add me on facebook, by doing a search with my email id : sirakshat@yahoo.com.

Thanks and Regards, Akshat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirakshat (talk • contribs)

Obvious error
As per editing Charlie Ray page, AfD is stated. Upon actually reading AfD, there are more KEEP votes than DELETE votes. Article should be kept in original form. 71.82.209.86 (talk) 08:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . Please see my reply on Talk:Charlie Ray. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. I can relate to this, I used to be new as well, and Wikipedia policy, customs and mannerisms can be hard to grasp at first (or sometimes, even now). However, given those circumstances, you may not want to be throwing around accusations and reverting people's edits. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Obviously you are so set in your misappropriated ways that you do not take the time to realize the actuality of the matter. The actress Charlie Ray has acted in recent films, thus the previous "shes did uun ting so les duhletes eet" caveman mentality is grossly outdated and extremely inappropriate. The page needs to stay in it's original form, not a redirect, and updated for current roles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.209.86 (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't know this actress nor do I presume to be an authority on which actress is notable and which is not. I'm just going by the consensus of the previous discussion. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Eddie Yagin
Does my modification about the new contract of Eddie Yagin reflect incorrectly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.212.44.250 (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You blanked the page....~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 10:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

editing a post
please edit this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhiman_Sikh dhiman is not only sikh tribe but also hindu tribe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manidhiman1818 (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Utente:Freesdom/Sandbox


A tag has been placed on Utente:Freesdom/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''Move page to actual User namespace. Page was copied here until a foreign language Wikipedia's name space prefix''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 10:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

I will change ip and keep f*cking you in the butt
better a fag than a lonely wikipedia user,eh sonny boy...what what in the butt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.103.80 (talk) 11:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

what waht,,,in the butt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.143.150 (talk) 11:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please do, it will help me with my boredom. :) ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 11:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Addon Technlogies


A tag has been placed on User talk:Addon Technlogies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

CSD:U2 – Somehow managed to message a typo-ed user talk page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Runemaster (game)
Hello Twsx. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Runemaster (game), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to products. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion within minutes of opening a page?
Hi there. You appear to have place a speedy deletion notice on the page Runemaster (game) whilst I was actually drafting the page (i.e., in the first 10 minutes after my creation of the page). A bit quick, no? Especially as the notice refers to it being for a "real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organized event" when what it refers to is none of these things? I realise there are people spamming Wiki all the time, but in this case you seem to have acted with excessive haste FOARP (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello . You may want to take a look at WP:DRAFT. Creating an article in a state that fails Wikipedia guidelines and policies can have the effects you yourself have witnessed. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

About That Dutch Phrase
Google Translate says it means:

"Penises in vaginas make babies poop in the lettuce and I love goat semen" — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadisonGrundtvig (talk • contribs)
 * Haha, I figured something along those lines! I'm Swiss, my native language is German, so I got parts of that. :) ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 16:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, vandalism can be quite hilarious sometimes, although it is altogether annoying and should not be done. I have not done very much with vandalism protection, because I have not caught very much of it. Although, I find vandalism on Wikia frequently, since that site is watched less, and I do a lot to stop that. Where are the most likely places to find vandalism on Wikipedia? P.S.: Thanks for reviewing my Blachman (disambiguation) page.MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Heya . Well, if you were to look for Vandalism "by hand", that would probably be hard. Usually, people use different tools for it. If you're interesting in getting involved, you can find a list of such tools at WP:VANDAL. Personally, I absolutely LOVE WP:Huggle, but that's up to you of course. Probably the most important "tool" for fighting vandalism, however, is User:ClueBot NG. It's an automated bot which has an amaaaaazingly effective detection rate with a just as amazing low rate of false-positives. Other than watching edits/changes, I also patrol Special:NewPages a lot. Hope that helps! =) ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 00:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Untitled
Regarding wikipedia. If I make a change they call it an edit war. If you "think" and change without any research or mentioning any references. Other users are edit warring and warning me of changes for which I give references. Want to ask what muslims believe or just want to make wikipedia a place for your thoughts and opinions. Did you read the Quran before making changes. The Quran is the definition of a muslim. Other users of wikipedia select other books which are not any authority on the subject to write the opinions of others or themselves. I think you are wrong. So you revert it yourself. I am getting tired of having even small changes with references reverted by others who think they can do an edit war for their opinions. I shall be telling about my experience with wikipedia to others. Have fun with wikipedia as another western opinion media propaganda dissiminator. There are many other better websites for information available which shall be referred to others as being more reliable. I feel that on wikipedia the majority opinion is now prevalent. Not the reality or original sources. It is similar to science. If the current so called western scientists were told initially that gravity is a pulling force, they shall believe it and not accept the other theory that it is a pushing force. They have no basis and shall stick to what they have learned or believed even if the measurements state otherwise. That is why so many self proclaimed scientists nowdays make statements like : "The the observations do not agree with the theory. " Such statements immediately make the person a non scientist by definition. But the people think they are above facts and definitions and measurements nowdays. Enjoy your wikipedia. I shall spend my time in other areas more useful to others. Regards, Khawar Khawar.nehal (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Wanna give me a hint on what you're talking about? ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 22:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

The revert you made to definition of a muslim based on what you "think". Khawar.nehal (talk) 22:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm rather certain that that is a gross misrepresentation of what I did, but in any case, you'll have to be a little more specific on that. I sometimes make edits/reverts to hundreds of articles a day. I can't exactly remember which ones they were. And seeing as you're wildly accusing me of stuff, I don't really feel the need to put an effort into researching this myself. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 07:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Are you sure about this?
? Philip Trueman (talk) 13:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey . Huggle sometimes seems to miss intermediate reverts. Combine that with me not double-checking afterwards, and that's what happens. Thanks for the notification, I've reverted myself now. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of it. My complaints to the writers of Huggle have always fallen on deaf ears - one reason why I won't touch it with a barge pole. Philip Trueman (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, in all fairness, it doesn't happen often. And Huggle really is pretty neat otherwise. Also I'm responsible for my edits, and technically should be checking the results of all my actions made with Huggle. Oh well... ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Reporting unneccessary deletions
I would like to know how to report unwarranted deletions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rico25new (talk • contribs)
 * Hello . The process of discussing (or contesting) previous deletions takes place, and is outlined, at Deletion review. If you're sure you feel that your article was deleted without just cause, that's where you want to go. I strongly recommend you read through the page, and most importantly, the instructions thoroughly before starting a discussion. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

I am done in contributing for wikipedia. May Deb himself shower knowledge about everything in this world to all. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rico25new (talk • contribs) 13:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

George Ryley Scott article
Hello, in response to your proposed deletion of this article: I have removed the BLP tag, since this is not a biography of a living person. George Ryley Scott was born in 1886 and if still alive, would now be 128 years old.

Scott is cited as a reference in a number of Wikipedia articles. His books are for sale on Amazon and are published in reprints by Routledge and Random House. I believe therefore that it is of interest to publish information about him and to build up a biography of him.

I propose to leave the article up as a stub to see if more information gathers on to it.Wwallacee (talk) 18:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Kyiv Naming Change
Hi there,

I see that the change I made yesterday had been reverted. I found this page with the discussion on the topic - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kiev/naming. The discussion has been closed and archived and I was wondering if it were possible to reopen it. The argument from the side opposing the change seems to be that "Kiev" is still a more commonly used name (despite the fact that all official US and Canadian documents now say "Kyiv"). To prove it they use the number of Google hits on either word. What they fail to understand is that a lot of people use Wikipedia when they are trying to find out the correct spelling of the word, so it ends up being a vicious cycle: the Wiki won't change the name until people start using the new one, and the people won't start using the new one until the Wiki changes it. Not to mention that Google underlines "Kyiv" as a grammatical error and corrects it to "Kiev" (I don't know whether this has anything to do with one of the Google founders being from Moscow). For a lot of Ukrainians it is important to set their country apart from Russia, which has dominated Ukraine for centuries both politically and culturally, as well as has done everything it could to suppress the Ukrainian language. Not to mention, that writing the name of the Ukrainian capital in English using Russian transliteration is downright offensive to those who have been trying to revive the Ukrainian culture and establish it as an independent entity. Independent specifically from Russia.

Thanks much, Valentine Azbelle. (born and raised in Kyiv) Azzzy (talk) 01:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . To re-open discussion on the subject, I'd recommend you just start a new section on Talk:Kiev. Make sure you have familiarized yourself with the past discussions and their arguments on both, the talk page itself and the special subpage created for the discussion. Then, explain in your new post why you think the previously reached consensus should be overturned. Regarding those other things: You have to remember, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and can't be blamed for people using it as such. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

EVotoCloud
Hola soy Sergio Avila, perdona pero creo que la entrada es correcta ya que proporciona un Sistema de voto electrónico. Si realmente crees que no tienen nada que ver con el voto electrónico elimina definitivamente la entrada, si crees lo contrario, por favor, añadela como enlace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.11.140.23 (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

'''[http://translate.google.com/#auto/en/Hola%20soy%20Sergio%20Avila%2C%20perdona%20pero%20creo%20que%20la%20entrada%20es%20correcta%20ya%20que%20proporciona%20un%20Sistema%20de%20voto%20electr%C3%B3nico.%20Si%20realmente%20crees%20que%20no%20tienen%20nada%20que%20ver%20con%20el%20voto%20electr%C3%B3nico%20elimina%20definitivamente%20la%20entrada%2C%20si%20crees%20lo%20contrario%2C%20por%20favor%2C%20a%C3%B1adela%20como%20enlace. English Translation] by Google Translate:''' Hello I am Sergio Avila, sorry but I think the entry is correct because it provides a system of electronic voting. If you really think that they have nothing to do with the electronic voting definitely removes the entry, if you think otherwise, please add it as a link.
 * Hello . Whether the link you added is fitting the subject or not is, in this case, irrelevant. The website you added seems to be not-notable according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. As such, your addition is considered to be spam. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Spanish Translation by Google Translate: Ya sea en el vínculo que ha añadido es apropiado o no el objeto, es decir, en este caso, irrelevante. La página web que ha añadido que parece ser no-notable según las directrices de notabilidad de Wikipedia. Como tal, su adición se considera que es correo no deseado.
 * Spanish Translation by Google Translate: Ya sea en el vínculo que ha añadido es apropiado o no el objeto, es decir, en este caso, irrelevante. La página web que ha añadido que parece ser no-notable según las directrices de notabilidad de Wikipedia. Como tal, su adición se considera que es correo no deseado.

Thanks
Thanks for your support. I'm off to "open my head" now. :-) Deb (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Anytime! Hah, yes, always good to have an open head... I think. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

About Prouds
Hi Twsx. Good WP:CSD tag there - it would have been a WP:G11 candidate until it was re-directed. I can a vouch for the company - it's a very well known Australian jewelry retailer. It would appear to me that 59.101.86.14 and Pidzz are making edits in good faith though some of the edits are sailing very close to the wind. Please feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi . Fair enough! The article it now redirects to is obviously well referenced, so it all turned out well in the end. Thanks for the notice. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 10:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

More to Review
Thanks for reviewing Maurice Martin's page. Now it is Akihito Nakamura, check? Remember, these 2 articles are made only because both played major role in Japanese invasion of French Indochina. OccultZone (talk) 12:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . I've set Akihito Nakamura as patrolled as well now. Be aware, however, that this is a routine process done when patrolling newly created pages and does not necessarily constitute a thorough reflection on the content, nor is it any form of administrative decision. :) Cheers ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * True. But some of my pages took like, 1 month+ for a review. So I thought of getting done with this process right now! Thanks :) OccultZone (talk) 12:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't worry about that too much! Even if your page is not yet set as patrolled, it is still visible for everyone. There is no difference really, the only point is that the article is set as "still to be checked for possible vandalism", which is obviously not the case here. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I will just add more reliable sources to the page. Case closed :) OccultZone (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Wikiuser13. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Selfie panorama, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 12:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . Most editing and anti-Vandalism aids (such as, in my case, Huggle and Twinkle) automatically patrol pages when certain actions – such as marking for speedy deletion – are performed. Just so you know. :) ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Tagging of Christopher Amoroso
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Christopher Amoroso. I do not think that 'Christopher Amoroso' fits any of the speedy deletion criteria I request that you consider not re-tagging 'Christopher Amoroso' for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. This may not be enough to justify an article at a deletion discussion, that will depend on refs, but it takes it out of the A7 speedy zone. DES (talk) 18:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Exactly the same reasoning applies to Antonio Rodrigues (9/11 officer). DES (talk) 19:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. Don't worry. I may tag articles very boldly, but I don't re-tag articles unless I can't AGF. I have tagged Antonio Rodrigues (9/11 officer) with a BLPPROD instead, however. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 07:47, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Untitled
Hey what the fuck? I dont appreciate you deleting my post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abraham willy (talk • contribs)
 * I'm terribly sorry that you find me reverting your obvious vandalism to be offputting. :( ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Untitled
Greetings, I'm happy for you or someone else to update these but they are out of date so am trying to bring them current. CcTLDconsultant (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * There's a difference between updating an article with current information and spamming an advertisement all over them. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Untitled
thank for undoing my recent contribution!! i blanked the page by mistake!! Thank you very much for ur kind cooperation!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello1181 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Display this proudly.

 * Wow, my first barnstar! :-) Thanks a bunch, ! And you're right. It's busy today and not as many people on the "job" as usual. Cheers ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Well don't I feel special now. ;-) Thank you, friend. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

A3 tagging
Hi there,

could you try not to tag articles as WP:CSD after only two minutes? That is biting the newbies. Thank you, —Kusma (t·c) 14:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . I usually don't in cases where there seems to be merit to an article. I can see how making such assumptions on an empty article could be misguided. I'll take it to heart and will try to remember. Thank you. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism?
How is my edit vandalism? I edited the Volkert van de graaf page. The man is a violent murderer who killed a politician to instill terror. He is a terrorist. The whole article is biased, putting him down as an "Activist."

If he's an activist, so is Osama Bin Laden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.104.113.198 (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . You should voice your opinions on the talk page then. Adding a completely unsourced attack on the subject of a BLP-article is a terrible idea and is looked upon as vandalism. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Money Laundering treaties
Hi, no, it wasn't vandalism nor a mistake, I simply transferred the content of "Money Laundering treaties" to "Money laundering treaties" since there didn't seem to be a way to simply move the page (the button wasn't appearing) Drounal (talk) 14:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . No worries then! I strongly recommend however that you make use of your edit summaries in the future. A page being blanked without any sort of explanation, well, I assume you can see how that would look bad. :) Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * No worries, I flagged the page for removal. Drounal (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Matilde Carvalho
"A Matilde é uma chata e cheira a bacalhau" means "Matilda is boring and smells like cod". Not duplication, just vandalism. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Guess I didn't notice that. Anyway, important thing is that it's gone. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep. They made another one like that and I've blocked them indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Greetings once again
Once again, you're back at the right time. 123 edits/10 reverts per minute on Huggle. Lock n' load. Happy vandal-sniping! Optakeover (Talk)   14:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey ! Hah, yeah, I saw you snipping faster than me a couple of times already this past hour-or-so. ;-) GOod job, cheers! ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Notice Board
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --173.59.201.71 (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Added sources to The Ninth Cloud
Hey! Normally I don't go bugging people, but I wanted to let you know that I found some more information on The Ninth Cloud and added it to the article. What made me go a little out of my norm is that the movie was filmed under quite a few different titles. That's not abnormal for films, but it is slightly unusual that it wasn't as openly noted in any of the various articles out there. After searching under the names of the various films I managed to get what I think is just enough for an article. It's less than what I usually want for a page, but then I really like to have a ton of sources to really make me comfortable with an article. In any case, I figure if it isn't, then we should probably leave the article's history intact and redirect it to the director's page. I think it's likely that this will gain more coverage once it releases, so just in case the current stuff isn't enough, we'll have something to pull on if it does gain more RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey . Thanks for the notice, and good work on the article! I agree with your rationale, and changed my AFD stance accordingly. Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 07:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks! That had to have been one of the harder searches I've done in a while! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

69.178.193.81
69.178.193.81 was probably the worst case of vandalism/trolling I've seen in my entire tour of duty. Thanks for reporting him. Optakeover (Talk)   15:36, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Heya . Yeah, with all the redirects that is actually really disruptive. There was one a couple of weeks ago who mass-tagged pages with a maintenance tag. Think it was something around 200 articles. Given that those were only tags and not redirects, I would say this one's worse. I can recommend User:Kangaroopower/scripts/Mass_Rollback for such cases, works like a charm. In this case though, you folks were faster. :) Cheers ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha. Now that's really some clean-up work, going through all his edits. Optakeover  (Talk)   15:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hussein Sabbour
Unfortunately, I've had to decline the BLPPROD tag here, as there were links in the article which mentioned the subject at the time of placement. While they are not reliable, independent sources, BLPPROD is so narrowly written that this doesn't qualify. You may wish to consider taking this to AfD. Thanks! --j⚛e deckertalk 18:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Omid Jame
Hi. If you can, please check Omid Jame 's article again. I've added to it more sources. There is the same article in persian wikipedia, but there isn't any problem, I don't know why this article is going to be deleted. thank you for your attention... Zahra sadeghi (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . Personally, I feel the article still doesn't establish the notability of the subject, and the sources you added are a little dodgy (see WP:RS). However, the deletion tag on the article is a proposed deletion. If you disagree with the deletion rationale, you are absolutely and 100% allowed to remove the deletion template. It is then up to others to either leave the article as it is, or decide to put it through the article deletion process. Hope that clears things up! Cheers. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi!
I couldn't help but notice you took down my link to Gibbons and my brother who currently holds a record in Football Manager 14 in the Robbie Gibbons page, I am disappointed but I do understand.

Cheers, Fergus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.222.180.23 (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Here is the rewritten text for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_Management_Consultants_Limited page thanks again
Focus Management is a recruitment company that finds people jobs in the food industry. Focus Management, the food industry recruitment company set up by Stephen Jones and Michael Staniland in 1990 in Manchester. Carrus was later rebranded and given the name Focus Graduates. Focus Graduates forms part of Focus Management Consultants which is made up of a number of specialist divisions all recruiting into the food and drink industry.[1]


 * Hey . As requested on IRC, I've put the text into the article. As mentioned before, you may want to work on it a little, so it won't get deleted again. Cheers! ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 22:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Laura Marano and external media
Just a note to explain why I reverted your edit where you left the summary "removing link to copyrighted image". The use of the external media template at that location was appropriate as that is the intended purpose of that template as documented at template:external media/doc and the link used met the requirements of WP:ELNEVER is "Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website has licensed the work, or uses the work in a way compliant with fair use." The linked to site is IMDb, a site normally valid for external links and the image hosted at that site is not a copyright violation when hosted by IMDb. We can't host that image on Commons and no fair-use is possible for a living person so this is the only way that an image can be provided where one is expected. The external media will need to be removed when a valid free-use image is found for this bio article but is permitted in the article until then. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Irdeto
Hello Twsx. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Irdeto, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article is about a different subject, although redirecting to Naspers may be appropriate. Thank you. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)