User talk:Twwalter/Archive 1

2010 D.C. United season
Hi, you appear to have added the incomplete reference name. Could you go back and add the full reference. Thsnks ClamDip (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Surinamese Eerste Klasse
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Surinamese Eerste Klasse, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.wikipedia.7val.com/wiki/Hoofdklasse_(Suriname).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Raynel Godfried
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Raynel Godfried. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Melvin Wandelaar
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Melvin Wandelaar. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Richard Reynolds (footballer)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Richard Reynolds (footballer). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Reynolds (footballer)


The article Richard Reynolds (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Snotty Wong  babble 22:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raynel Godfried


The article Raynel Godfried has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 18:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Whitecaps
Thanks for all the work on the Whitecaps articles. I'm not sure if you're aware of the controversy you may be creating. I'll give you a clue: look at Talk:Vancouver Whitecaps FC; and a hint: not everyone thinks the Whitecaps' legacy should go back to 1974. I for one do. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm looking for some info on the older Whitecaps logo, and wondering where you got this info: "At this time, the Whitecaps logo changed slightly in colour (the light teal-green was replaced with a brighter blue) and the word Vancouver was dropped from the image." I can only find one version of the logo, with the teal-ish colour. Thanks. Brentonwalters (talk) 17:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Toronto FC
Please find a source stating that Toronto FC's full name is Toronto Football Club before you change. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

MLS redirects
Hey, Twwalter -

I undid your redirect of "MLS" to Major League Soccer. There are too many other meanings for the acronym (employed outside the fairly narrow set of people who are U.S.-based soccer fans) to single that one out - a realtor, for example, would immediately think of Multiple Listing Service. More generally, you're making a lot of valuable edits, but please take care. For example, try to stick with sourced material (e.g., for the "full names" of DC United and Toronto FC, which I also undid), don't leave things half-completed, like the section headings you created for MLS Cup 2010 but then didn't fill, and watch out for typos (your redirect of Walking Bout Company was a redlink). Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 14:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

History of Portland Timbers
Hi! I saw that this article was tagged by CorenSearchBot and I'm following up on that. You are correct that the external site identified was a false positive, but there is an issue with copying text from one page into another page.

While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table
Template:1996 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 20:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Revert explanation
Just a quick explanation for why I reverted this edit. The main reason is that it is not accurate. Just off the top of my head I can think of the K-League and S-League that don't have pro/rel. I also believe there are a few other leagues in AFC don't have pro/rel yet. The other is that, even if it were true, I'm not sure of how important that information is that it would need to be in the article's lede vs. all the other information in the article that is also not mentioned in the lede. --Bobblehead (rants) 02:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of 2010–11 Walking Bout Company season for deletion
The article 2010–11 Walking Bout Company season is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2010–11 Walking Bout Company season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – PeeJay 04:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC)